Krishnansu S Tewari1, Michael W Sill, Harry J Long, Richard T Penson, Helen Huang, Lois M Ramondetta, Lisa M Landrum, Ana Oaknin, Thomas J Reid, Mario M Leitao, Helen E Michael, Bradley J Monk. 1. From the University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange (K.S.T.); Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo (M.W.S., H.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (H.J.L.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (R.T.P.); M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (L.M.R.); University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City (L.M.L.); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona (A.O.); University of Cincinnati College of Medicine-Women's Cancer Center at Kettering, Kettering, OH (T.J.R.); Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.M.L.); Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (H.E.M.); and the University of Arizona Cancer Center and Creighton University at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix (B.J.M.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis, a mediator of disease progression in cervical cancer. Bevacizumab, a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has single-agent activity in previously treated, recurrent disease. Most patients in whom recurrent cervical cancer develops have previously received cisplatin with radiation therapy, which reduces the effectiveness of cisplatin at the time of recurrence. We evaluated the effectiveness of bevacizumab and nonplatinum combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer. METHODS: Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned 452 patients tochemotherapy with or without bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin at a dose of 50 mg per square meter of body-surface area, plus paclitaxel at a dose of 135 or 175 mg per square meter or topotecan at a dose of 0.75 mg per square meter on days 1 to 3, plus paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg per square meter on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression, the development of unacceptable toxic effects, or a complete response was documented. The primary end point was overall survival; a reduction of 30% in the hazard ratio for death was considered clinically important. RESULTS: Groups were well balanced with respect to age, histologic findings, performance status, previous use or nonuse of a radiosensitizing platinum agent, and disease status. Topotecan-paclitaxel was not superior to cisplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for death, 1.20). With the data for the two chemotherapy regimens combined, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was associated with increased overall survival (17.0 months vs. 13.3 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.71; 98% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.95; P=0.004 in a one-sided test) and higher response rates (48% vs. 36%, P=0.008). Bevacizumab, as compared with chemotherapy alone, was associated with an increased incidence of hypertension of grade 2 or higher (25% vs. 2%), thromboembolic events of grade 3 or higher (8% vs. 1%), and gastrointestinal fistulas of grade 3 or higher (3% vs. 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bevacizumab to combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer was associated with an improvement of 3.7 months in median overall survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; GOG 240 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00803062.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis, a mediator of disease progression in cervical cancer. Bevacizumab, a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has single-agent activity in previously treated, recurrent disease. Most patients in whom recurrent cervical cancer develops have previously received cisplatin with radiation therapy, which reduces the effectiveness of cisplatin at the time of recurrence. We evaluated the effectiveness of bevacizumab and nonplatinum combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer. METHODS: Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned 452 patients to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin at a dose of 50 mg per square meter of body-surface area, plus paclitaxel at a dose of 135 or 175 mg per square meter or topotecan at a dose of 0.75 mg per square meter on days 1 to 3, plus paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg per square meter on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression, the development of unacceptable toxic effects, or a complete response was documented. The primary end point was overall survival; a reduction of 30% in the hazard ratio for death was considered clinically important. RESULTS: Groups were well balanced with respect to age, histologic findings, performance status, previous use or nonuse of a radiosensitizing platinum agent, and disease status. Topotecan-paclitaxel was not superior to cisplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for death, 1.20). With the data for the two chemotherapy regimens combined, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was associated with increased overall survival (17.0 months vs. 13.3 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.71; 98% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.95; P=0.004 in a one-sided test) and higher response rates (48% vs. 36%, P=0.008). Bevacizumab, as compared with chemotherapy alone, was associated with an increased incidence of hypertension of grade 2 or higher (25% vs. 2%), thromboembolic events of grade 3 or higher (8% vs. 1%), and gastrointestinal fistulas of grade 3 or higher (3% vs. 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bevacizumab to combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer was associated with an improvement of 3.7 months in median overall survival. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; GOG 240 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00803062.).
Authors: Jeffrey D Bloss; John A Blessing; Brent C Behrens; Robert S Mannel; Janet S Rader; Anil K Sood; Maurie Markman; Jo Benda Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K S Tewari; J A Taylor; S Y Liao; P J DiSaia; R A Burger; B J Monk; C C Hughes; L P Villarreal Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: G A Omura; J A Blessing; L Vaccarello; M L Berman; D L Clarke-Pearson; D G Mutch; B Anderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Amy D Tiersten; Meredith J Selleck; Dawn L Hershman; D Smith; Edward E Resnik; Andrea B Troxel; Lois B Brafman; Laureen Shriberg Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: David H Moore; John A Blessing; Richard P McQuellon; Howard T Thaler; David Cella; Jo Benda; David S Miller; George Olt; Stephanie King; John F Boggess; Thomas F Rocereto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sanja Stevanović; Sarah R Helman; John R Wunderlich; Michelle M Langhan; Stacey L Doran; Mei Li M Kwong; Robert P T Somerville; Christopher A Klebanoff; Udai S Kammula; Richard M Sherry; James C Yang; Steven A Rosenberg; Christian S Hinrichs Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: John K Chan; Wei Deng; Robert V Higgins; Krishnansu S Tewari; Albert J Bonebrake; Michael Hicks; Stephanie Gaillard; Pedro T Ramirez; Weldon Chafe; Bradley J Monk; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 5.482