| Literature DB >> 30182050 |
Hongsup Yoon1, Monika Schaubeck2, Ilias Lagkouvardos3,4, Andreas Blesl5, Stephanie Heinzlmeir6,7, Hannes Hahne6,8, Thomas Clavel4,9, Suchita Panda10, Christina Ludwig7, Bernhard Kuster6,7, Chaysavanh Manichanh10, Patrizia Kump5, Dirk Haller1,4, Gabriele Hörmannsperger1.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Antibiotic (ABx) therapy is associated with increased risk for Crohn's disease but underlying mechanisms are unknown. We observed high fecal serine protease activity (PA) to be a frequent side effect of ABx therapy. The aim of the present study was to unravel whether this rise in large intestinal PA may promote colitis development via detrimental effects on the large intestinal barrier.Entities:
Keywords: ABx, antibiotics; AEBSF, 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride; DSS, dextran sulfate sodium; Epithelial Barrier; GF, germ-free; Gut Microbiota; IBD, inflammatory bowel diseases; IL, interleukin; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry; PA, protease activity; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PMSF, phenylmethane-sulfonylfluoride; SPF, specific pathogen-free; Serine Proteases; TEER, transepithelial electrical resistance; V/M, vancomycin/metronidazole; WT, wild-type; cecal-sup, cecal-supernatants; ctr, control; stool-sup, stool-supernatants
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30182050 PMCID: PMC6121113 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.05.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Patient Characteristics
| Classification | ABx name | ABx therapy duration, | Indication | Fold increase in PA | Diarrhea (after ABx) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoroquinolone (+Imidazole) | Levofloxacin | 7 | Bronchitis | 7.57 | No |
| Levofloxacin | 7 | Bronchitis | 0.30 | No | |
| Levofloxacin | 7 | Bronchitis | 3.04 | No | |
| Levofloxacin | 7 | Bronchitis | 2.35 | No | |
| Levofloxacin | 7 | Bronchitis | 5.50 | No | |
| Levofloxacin | 7 | Bronchitis | 1.83 | No | |
| Ciprofloxacin | 7 | UC | 13.59 | No | |
| Levofloxacin | 7 | Bronchitis | 0.32 | No | |
| Levofloxacin+metronidazole | 7 | 8.27 | No | ||
| β-Lactam | Amoxicillin+clavulanate | 7 | Bacteremia | 12.74 | No |
| Amoxicillin+clavulanate | 7 | Bronchitis | 0.96 | No | |
| Amoxicillin+clavulanate | 7 | Bacteremia | 1.43 | No | |
| Amoxicillin+clavulanate | 7 | Bronchitis | 1.02 | No | |
| Amoxicillin+clavulanate | 7 | Urinary infection | 2.23 | No | |
| Amoxicillin+clavulanate | 7 | Bronchitis | 0.26 | No | |
| Amoxicillin+clavulanate | 7 | Bronchitis | 0.37 | No | |
| Cephalosporin (+macrolide) | Azithromycin | 2 | CD | 6.10 | No |
| Ceftriaxone+azithromycin | 7 | Pneumonia | 0.41 | No | |
| Ceftriaxone+azithromycin | 7 | Bronchitis | 1.29 | No | |
| Ceftriaxone | 7 | Urinary infection | 0.51 | No | |
| Rifamycin | Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 10.49 | No |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 0.34 | No | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 0.45 | No | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 2.49 | No | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 2.17 | No | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 0.82 | Yes | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 0.77 | No | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 1.85 | No | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 0.92 | Yes | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 0.73 | Yes | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 0.64 | Yes | |
| Rifaximin | 3 | IBS | 5.36 | No |
ABx, antibiotic; CD, Crohn’s disease; IBS, inflammatory bowel syndrome; PA, protease activity; UC, ulcerative colitis.
Disease Activity Score
| Score | Weight loss ( | Stool consistency | Blood in stool |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | Normal | No blood |
| 1 | Lower than 5 | — | — |
| 2 | Lower than 10 | Slightly changed | Positive |
| 3 | Lower than 15 | — | Positive for 2 d |
| 4 | Lower than 20 | Diarrhea | Positive for more than 2 d |
Primer Sequences and UPL Probe IDs for Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
| Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer | Probe |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5’-cctttggaccctctgacttg | 5’-agcgttcattgtctcagagcta | 63 | |
| 5’-tgtaatgaaagacggcacacc | 5’-tcttctttgggtattgcttgg | 78 | |
| 5’-accttacctcggcaagtttct | 5’-ttgtagagctgctggtcagg | 76 | |
| 5’-cttgtacctgaaagctcgagtg | 5’-gatgattatggctactgctgtca | 10 | |
| 5’-tccactcatggcaaattcaa | 5’-tttgatgttagtggggtctcg | 9 |
Figure 1High stool PA is a frequent adverse effect of ABx treatment in patients and impairs the epithelial barrier (A) Serine protease activity in stool-supernatant of patients before and after ABx treatment. Red line (n = 9), fluoroquinolone (+imidazole) antibiotic; blue line (n = 7), β-lactam antibiotic; green line (n = 4), cephalosporin (+macrolide) antibiotic; black line (n = 12), rifamycine antibiotic. (B) Staining of active serine proteases in stool-supernatants of patients before and after ABx treatment (TAMRA-FP sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). (C) Fluorescein translocation and TEER in polarized PTK6 cells on apical exposure to stool-supernatants from the same patient before versus after the respective ABx treatment ± PMSF-inhibition.
Figure 2Eradication of antiproteolytic bacteria by V/M treatment results in excessive large intestinal PA and impairs the epithelial barrier (A) Comparison of the level of luminal serine protease activity in the ileum (il), cecum (ce), colon (co), and feces (fe) of untreated SPF (ctr), V/M-treated (V/M), and GF mice. (B) Bacteria were isolated from fresh cecum content of SPF or V/M-treated mice, and cecal-sup from GF mice was incubated for 24 hours with buffer (ctr), the respective freshly isolated bacteria, or heat-killed (h.) bacteria. The remaining serine protease activity in GF cecal-sup was measured after the incubation. (C) Protease activity in cecal-sup of ctr mice, GF mice, GF mice associated with cecal microbiota from either ctr SPF mice (ctr->GF), or V/M-treated SPF mice for 2 weeks (V/M->GF). (D) Staining of active serine proteases in cecal-sup of ctr, V/M, or GF mice (TAMRA-FP sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). (E) Volcano plot showing all murine proteases (red) and protease inhibitors (PI, blue) that were detected via LC-MS/MS analysis in cecal-supernatants of ctr, V/M, or GF mice (n = 3/group). The log2 intensity (depicted by the dot size) indicates the abundance of the respective protein. The proteins on the right side of the volcano blots are significantly higher abundant in V/M-treated or GF mice, respectively, compared with control mice. (F) Fluorescein translocation and TEER in polarized PTK6 cells on apical exposure to cecal-sup from ctr mice versus V/M-treated mice ± PMSF inhibition. (G) Colonic tissue sections from SPF mice were apically exposed to cecal-sup from control SPF (ctr) mice or cecal-sup from GF mice ± PMSF in an Ussing chamber setup. Translocation of apically applied fluorescein to the basolateral side and TEER of the respective tissue sections were measured.
Abundance of Proteases and Protease Inhibitors in Cecal-Sup of Untreated, V/M-Treated, and GF WT Mice (Determined Via LC-MS/MS Analysis)
NOTE. The number in the columns with color code is mean intensity of proteins (log2 intensity based absolute quantitation) as described by the dot size in Figure 2D. The ratio is the fold change of the respective protein in V/M or GF mice compared with untreated (ctrl) mice. The P value is the significance level of the abundance difference. Color code: red = high intensity; green = low intensity.
a.p., aspartyl protease; c.p., cysteine protease; iBAQ, intensity-based absolute quantitation; m.p., metalloprotease; NaN, not detected; s.p., serine protease; t.p., threonine protease.
Figure 3Excessive large intestinal PA results in transient impairment of the intestinal barrier in WT mice. (A) Experimental schedule: untreated WT mice (ctr), V/M-treated WT mice at Day 2 of the treatment (V/M), and V/M-treated WT mice 7 days after discontinuation of the treatment (post-V/M) were investigated. (B, C) Fecal and cecal serine protease activity. (D) Plasma concentration of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) dextran 4 hours after oral gavage of FITC dextran (4 kDa). (E) Ussing chamber analyses of fluorescein translocation and TEER in cecal tissue sections. (F) mRNA expression levels of IL1β and CD3 in colonic tissue. (G) Experimental schedule: V/M-treated WT mice were cotreated (oral gavage) with the serine protease inhibitor AEBSF (V/M AEBSF) or H2O (V/M wat), starting from 1 day before V/M treatment. (H, I) Fecal and cecal serine protease activity. (J) Plasma concentration of FITC dextran 4 hours after oral gavage of FITC dextran (4 kDa). (K) Ussing chamber analyses of fluorescein translocation and TEER in cecal tissue sections.
Figure 4Excessive large intestinal PA does not disturb the intestinal immune homeostasis in WT mice. (A) Long-term experimental setup: WT mice were left untreated (ctr) or repeatedly treated with V/M (2 times for 7 days at the age of 4 and 8 weeks) (V/M) before acute DSS colitis was induced at the age of 12 weeks (n = 6/group). (B) Overview on the V/M-mediated and DSS-mediated compositional dynamics in the intestinal microbiota of V/M-treated mice compared with ctr mice (family level). (C) Overview on the long-term impact of V/M treatment on the phylogenetic makeup (beta-diversity) of cecal microbiota and its response to DSS treatment. (D) Richness of the intestinal microbiota. (E) Relative abundance of Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Porphyromonadaceae in untreated versus V/M-treated WT mice before and after exposure to DSS. The number of mice in which the respective bacterial family was detected (prevalence) is depicted above the respective figure. Color code: purple = during V/M treatment, light red = post V/M treatment (after first and second V/M treatments), red = DSS treatment. (F) Kinetic of the fecal serine protease activity in untreated (ctr) versus V/M-treated (V/M) WT mice. (G) Body weight development in ctr and V/M-treated WT mice. (H) The left panel shows the development of the disease activity index after induction of acute colitis by DSS. The right panel shows representative hematoxylin-eosin stainings including the mean histopathological score of colonic tissue from DSS-treated ctr versus DSS-treated V/M-pretreated mice at Day 8 after the induction of DSS colitis. (I–K) Organ weight in DSS-treated ctr and V/M-pretreated WT mice. DAI, disease activity index.
Figure 5Excessive large intestinal PA results in lasting impairment of the intestinal barrier in IL10mice. (A) Experimental setup: Untreated IL10-/- mice (ctr), V/M-treated IL10-/- mice at Day 2 of the treatment (V/M), and V/M-treated IL10-/- mice 7 days after discontinuation of the V/M treatment (post-V/M) were investigated. (B, C) Fecal and cecal serine protease activity. (D) Plasma concentration of fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (4 kDa) 4 hours after oral gavage. (E) Ussing chamber analyses of cecal and colonic tissue. (F) mRNA expression level of IL1β and CD3 in colonic tissue. (G) Experimental schedule: V/M-treated IL10-/- mice were orally gavaged with the serine protease inhibitor AEBSF (V/M-AEBSF) or H2O (V/M-wat), starting from 1 day before V/M treatment. (H, I) Fecal and cecal serine protease activity. (J) Plasma concentration of fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (4 kDa) 4 hours after oral gavage. (K) Ussing chamber analyses of fluorescein translocation and TEER in colonic tissue sections. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Figure 6Impact of repeated V/M treatment on the microbial ecosystem in IL10mice. (A) Long-term experimental setup: IL10-/- mice were left untreated or underwent repeated V/M treatment (2 times for 7 days at the age of 4 and 8 weeks) ± oral gavage of the serine protease inhibitor AEBSF (V/M-AEBSF) from 1 day before the beginning of the respective V/M treatment to Day 7. (B) Kinetic of the fecal microbiota composition in untreated versus V/M-treated IL10-/- mice (family level). (C) MetaNMDS plot showing fecal microbiota profiles (beta diversity) of untreated versus V/M-treated IL10-/- mice. (D) Microbial richness in ctr and V/M IL10-/- mice. Color code: purple = during V/M treatment, light red = post V/M treatment (after first and second V/M treatments). (E) Relative abundance of Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Porphyromonadaceae in untreated versus V/M-treated IL10-/- mice. The number of mice, in which the respective bacterial family was detected (prevalence) is depicted above the respective figure.
Figure 7Excessive large intestinal PA accelerates colitis development in IL10mice. (A) Kinetic of the fecal serine protease activity in IL10-/- mice. (B, C) Development of plasma serum amyloid A levels (systemic inflammation marker) and fecal complement component 3 (C3) levels (marker for intestinal inflammation) in IL10-/- mice. (D) mRNA expression levels of C3, IL1β, and interferon-γ in large intestinal tissue of IL10-/- mice. (E) T-cell infiltration in the proximal colon was determined by immunofluorescence staining of CD3+ cells. Quantification of CD3+ T cells per mm2 at 6 representative regions in tissue sections per mouse. (F) The left panel shows representative pictures of hematoxylin-eosin-stained colonic tissue and the right panel shows the histopathologic score of individual IL10-/- mice. (G) The left panel shows representative pictures of hematoxylin-eosin-stained tumors that were exclusively observed in the cecum and colon of V/M-treated IL10-/- mice. The right panel shows the prevalence of tumor formation in the respective treatment group. IFN, interferon; SAA, serum amyloid A.