Russell Nelson1, Johnathan Cheatham1, Dympna Gallagher2, Kevin Bigelman3, Diana M Thomas4. 1. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Military Academy, West Point, NY, 10996, USA. 2. Body Composition Unit, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA. 3. Department of Physical Education, Military Academy, West Point, NY, 10996, USA. 4. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Military Academy, West Point, NY, 10996, USA. diana.thomas@usma.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective for percent body fat standards in the United States Army Body Composition Program (ABCP) is to ensure soldiers maintain optimal well-being and performance under all conditions. However, conducting large-scale experiments within the United States Army to evaluate the efficacy of the thresholds is challenging. METHODS: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was performed on body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference to determine optimal gender-specific age cohort thresholds that meet ABCP percent body fat standards in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. A second dataset consisting of a cohort of basic training recruits (N = 20,896 soldiers, 28% female) with BMI and waist circumference measured using a 3D body image scanner was applied to calculate what percent of basic training recruits meet the ABCP percent body fat standards. Regression models to determine the contribution of different circumference sites to the predictions of percent body fat were developed using a database compiled at the New York Obesity Research Center (N = 500). RESULTS: Optimal BMI thresholds ranged from 23.65 kg/m2 (17-21-year-old cohort) to 26.55 kg/m2 (40 and over age cohort) for males and 21.75 to 24.85 kg/m2 for females. The AUC values were between 0.86 and 0.92. The waist circumference thresholds ranged 81.35 to 97.55 cm for males and 77.05 to 89.35 cm for females with AUC values between 0.90 and 0.91. These BMI thresholds were exceeded by 65% of male and 74% of female basic training recruits and waist circumference thresholds were exceeded by 73% of male and 85% of female recruits. The single circumference that contributed most to prediction of body fat was waist circumference in males and mid-thigh circumference in females. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCP percent body fat thresholds yield BMI thresholds that are below the United States Army BMI standards, especially in females which suggests the ABCP percent body fat standards may be too restrictive. The United States Army percent body fat standards could instead be matched to existing national health guidelines.
BACKGROUND: The objective for percent body fat standards in the United States Army Body Composition Program (ABCP) is to ensure soldiers maintain optimal well-being and performance under all conditions. However, conducting large-scale experiments within the United States Army to evaluate the efficacy of the thresholds is challenging. METHODS: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was performed on body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference to determine optimal gender-specific age cohort thresholds that meet ABCP percent body fat standards in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. A second dataset consisting of a cohort of basic training recruits (N = 20,896 soldiers, 28% female) with BMI and waist circumference measured using a 3D body image scanner was applied to calculate what percent of basic training recruits meet the ABCP percent body fat standards. Regression models to determine the contribution of different circumference sites to the predictions of percent body fat were developed using a database compiled at the New York Obesity Research Center (N = 500). RESULTS: Optimal BMI thresholds ranged from 23.65 kg/m2 (17-21-year-old cohort) to 26.55 kg/m2 (40 and over age cohort) for males and 21.75 to 24.85 kg/m2 for females. The AUC values were between 0.86 and 0.92. The waist circumference thresholds ranged 81.35 to 97.55 cm for males and 77.05 to 89.35 cm for females with AUC values between 0.90 and 0.91. These BMI thresholds were exceeded by 65% of male and 74% of female basic training recruits and waist circumference thresholds were exceeded by 73% of male and 85% of female recruits. The single circumference that contributed most to prediction of body fat was waist circumference in males and mid-thigh circumference in females. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCP percent body fat thresholds yield BMI thresholds that are below the United States Army BMI standards, especially in females which suggests the ABCP percent body fat standards may be too restrictive. The United States Army percent body fat standards could instead be matched to existing national health guidelines.
Authors: Sean M Collins; Max Silberlicht; Chris Perzinski; Stephen P Smith; Patrick W Davidson Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Beat Knechtle; Andrea Wirth; Barbara Baumann; Patrizia Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann; Senn Oliver Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: L Soileau; D Bautista; C Johnson; C Gao; K Zhang; X Li; S B Heymsfield; D Thomas; J Zheng Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Ursula Barandun; Beat Knechtle; Patrizia Knechtle; Andreas Klipstein; Christoph Alexander Rüst; Thomas Rosemann; Romuald Lepers Journal: Open Access J Sports Med Date: 2012-07-02