Literature DB >> 22643136

Body composition and military performance--many things to many people.

Karl E Friedl1.   

Abstract

Soldiers are expected to maintain the highest possible level of physical readiness because they must be ready to mobilize and perform their duties anywhere in the world at any time. The objective of Army body composition standards is to motivate physical training and good nutrition habits to ensure a high state of readiness. Establishment of enforceable and rational standards to support this objective has been challenging even at extremes of body size. Morbidly obese individuals are clearly not suited to military service, but very large muscular individuals may be superbly qualified for soldier performance demands. For this reason, large individuals are measured for body fat using a waist circumference-based equation (female soldiers are also measured for hip circumference). The main challenge comes in setting appropriate fat standards to support the full range of Army requirements. Military appearance ideals dictate the most stringent body fat standards, whereas health risk thresholds anchor the most liberal standards, and physical performance associations fall on a spectrum between these 2 poles. Standards should not exclude or penalize specialized performance capabilities such as endurance running or power lifting across a spectrum of body sizes and fat. The full integration of women into the military further complicates the issue because of sexually dimorphic characteristics that make gender-appropriate standards essential and where inappropriately stringent standards can compromise both health and performance of this segment of the force. Other associations with body composition such as stress effects on intraabdominal fat distribution patterns and metabolic implications of a fat reserve for survival in extreme environments are also relevant considerations. This is a review of the science that underpins the U.S. Army body composition standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22643136     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825ced6c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  17 in total

Review 1.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Obesity Prevention in the Military.

Authors:  Marissa Shams-White; Patricia Deuster
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-06

3.  Body Composition, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, and Vitamin D are Associated with Army Combat Fitness Test Performance.

Authors:  Jeffery L Heileson; Jared M McGowen; Jose M Moris; Tomas J Chapman-Lopez; Ricardo Torres; LesLee K Funderburk; Jeffrey S Forsse
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.948

4.  Weight Perceptions and Weight Loss Attempts: Military Service Matters.

Authors:  Jessica Y Breland; Michele L Patel; Jessie J Wong; Katherine J Hoggatt
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Revisiting the United States Army body composition standards: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Russell Nelson; Johnathan Cheatham; Dympna Gallagher; Kevin Bigelman; Diana M Thomas
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Body Mass Index and Measures of Body Fat for Defining Obesity and Underweight: A Cross-Sectional of Various Specialties in Montenegrin Army Soldiers.

Authors:  Stevo Popovic; Boris Banjevic; Bojan Masanovic; Dusko Bjelica
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Thermal-work strain in law enforcement personnel during chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) training.

Authors:  M Yokota; A J Karis; W J Tharion
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-04

8.  Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Estimation Fat-Free Mass in the Army Cadets.

Authors:  Raquel D Langer; Juliano H Borges; Mauro A Pascoa; Vagner X Cirolini; Gil Guerra-Júnior; Ezequiel M Gonçalves
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Does body mass index misclassify physically active young men.

Authors:  Tyson Grier; Michelle Canham-Chervak; Marilyn Sharp; Bruce H Jones
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-06-11

10.  Combined association of fitness and central adiposity with health-related quality of life in healthy Men: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Robert A Sloan; Susumu S Sawada; Corby K Martin; Benjamin Haaland
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.