Literature DB >> 30179708

Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking.

John D Roache1, Tara E Karns-Wright2, Martin Goros3, Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak2, Charles W Mathias2, Donald M Dougherty4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have objectively quantified drinking through the use of Alcohol Monitoring System's (AMS) transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) device known as SCRAM CAM. Criteria that AMS uses to detect drinking are known to be conservative and only reliably detect heavy drinking equivalent to 5 or more standard drinks. Our group has developed Research Rules used to process TAC data in a manner that will detect low-level and moderate drinking even though it is below the AMS criteria for detection.
METHODS: Sixteen male and 14 female paid research volunteers wore TAC monitors for 28 days in their natural environments and responded daily to text message prompts to self-report the previous day's drinking. Current analyses describe the Research Rules that we developed and how use of those rules impacts the detection of self-reported drinking treated as the standard in sensitivity/specificity analysis.
RESULTS: We observed 606 occurrences of positive TAC events over a total of 867 days and processed the TAC data to retain 345 as possible drinking events, even though AMS criteria confirmed drinking for only 163 of these events. The kinds of TAC events removed or retained by our rules are illustrated as cases of low and moderate drinking days that were detected by our rules but not by the conservative AMS criteria. AMS-confirmed TAC events have a high specificity (99.8%) to detect primarily heavy drinking, but have a poor sensitivity to detect lower-level drinking and a poor specificity as an indicator of alcohol abstinence. In contrast, our Research Rules detected 100% of TAC events detected by AMS but also detected 31% of the lower-level drinking events not detected by AMS, with 91% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: Reliance upon the AMS criteria for alcohol detection affords a high specificity for detection of heavy drinking but is a poor indicator of abstinence rates. In contrast, use of our Research Rules provides more sensitive means to quantify either any drinking or low-moderate levels of drinking while still maintaining good specificity.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol consumption; Heavy drinking; Low-level drinking; Sensitivity; Specificity; Transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC); Transdermal alcohol monitoring

Year:  2018        PMID: 30179708      PMCID: PMC6559864          DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol        ISSN: 0741-8329            Impact factor:   2.405


  22 in total

Review 1.  Towards a national model for managing impaired driving offenders.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; Robert L DuPont; Stephen K Talpins; Corinne L Shea
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Estimating BrAC from transdermal alcohol concentration data using the BrAC estimator software program.

Authors:  Susan E Luczak; I Gary Rosen
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Adjustments for drink size and ethanol content: new results from a self-report diary and transdermal sensor validation study.

Authors:  Jason C Bond; Thomas K Greenfield; Deidre Patterson; William C Kerr
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Contingency management for alcohol use reduction: a pilot study using a transdermal alcohol sensor.

Authors:  Nancy P Barnett; Jennifer Tidey; James G Murphy; Robert Swift; Suzanne M Colby
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Comparing the detection of transdermal and breath alcohol concentrations during periods of alcohol consumption ranging from moderate drinking to binge drinking.

Authors:  Donald M Dougherty; Nora E Charles; Ashley Acheson; Samantha John; R Michael Furr; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  The correspondence between transdermal alcohol monitoring and daily self-reported alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Tara E Karns-Wright; Donald M Dougherty; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Charles W Mathias; John D Roache
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Using Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring to Detect Low-Level Drinking.

Authors:  John D Roache; Tara E Karns; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Jillian Mullen; Yuanyuan Liang; Richard J Lamb; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Field and laboratory alcohol detection with 2 types of transdermal devices.

Authors:  Paul R Marques; A Scott McKnight
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations.

Authors:  Tara E Karns-Wright; John D Roache; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Yuanyuan Liang; Jillian Mullen; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.826

10.  Translating transdermal alcohol monitoring procedures for contingency management among adults recently arrested for DWI.

Authors:  Charles W Mathias; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Tara E Karns-Wright; Jillian Mullen; John D Roache; James C Fell; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of Alcohol Use in the Natural Environment.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Outcome Assessment in Trials of Pharmacological Treatments for Alcohol Use Disorders: Fair and Strict Testing.

Authors:  Susanne Rösner; Michael Soyka
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Daily Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior and Alcohol Use in At-Risk College Students.

Authors:  Ashley B West; Rachel N Bomysoad; Michael A Russell; David E Conroy
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-07-12

4.  To Drink or Not to Drink: Is That the Question? Examining Correspondence and Predictive Validity of Morning Drinking Intentions for Young Adults' Drinking Behaviors and Consequences.

Authors:  Jimikaye B Courtney; Michael A Russell
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-09-26

5.  Sensitivity, specificity, and tolerability of the BACTrack Skyn compared to other alcohol monitoring approaches among young adults in a field-based setting.

Authors:  Garrett I Ash; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Nancy P Barnett; Wuyi Wang; David S Robledo; Kelly S DeMartini; Brian Pittman; Nancy S Redeker; Stephanie S O'Malley; Lisa M Fucito
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.928

6.  A Discreet Wearable IoT Sensor for Continuous Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring - Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Baichen Li; R Scott Downen; Quan Dong; Nam Tran; Maxine LeSaux; Andrew C Meltzer; Zhenyu Li
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.301

7.  Transdermal sensor features correlate with ecological momentary assessment drinking reports and predict alcohol-related consequences in young adults' natural settings.

Authors:  Michael A Russell; Robert J Turrisi; Joshua M Smyth
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Wrist-worn alcohol biosensors: Applications and usability in behavioral research.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Daniel J Fridberg; Destin D Shortell; Robert F Leeman; Nancy P Barnett; Robert L Cook; Eric C Porges
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.558

9.  Preliminary Effectiveness of a Remotely Monitored Blood Alcohol Concentration Device as Treatment Modality: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Frank D Buono; Colette Gleed; Martin Boldin; Allison Aviles; Natalie Wheeler
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-01-14

10.  Ecological Momentary Assessment of Alcohol Consumption and Its Concordance with Transdermal Alcohol Detection and Timeline Follow-Back Self-report Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.

Authors:  Eun-Young Mun; Xiaoyin Li; Michael S Businelle; Emily T Hébert; Zhengqi Tan; Nancy P Barnett; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.