Literature DB >> 27522029

Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations.

Tara E Karns-Wright1, John D Roache1, Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak1, Yuanyuan Liang2, Jillian Mullen1, Donald M Dougherty3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Monitors of transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) provide an objective measurement of alcohol consumption that is less invasive than measurements in blood, breath or urine; however, there is a substantial time delay in the onset of TAC compared to blood or breath alcohol concentrations (BrACs). The current study examined the characteristics of the delay between peak TAC and peak BrAC.
METHODS: Data was aggregated from three experimental laboratory studies (N = 61; 32 men, 29 women) in which participants wore a TAC monitor and BrAC was monitored while drinking one, two, three, four and five beers in the laboratory. Analyses examined the sex- and dose-related differences in peak BrAC and TAC, the time-to-peak BrAC and TAC, and time lag between the peak BrAC and TAC values.
RESULTS: The times-to-peak were an increasing function of the number of beers consumed. At each level of beer consumption the peak TAC averaged lower than peak BrAC and times-to-peak TAC were longer than for BrAC. The time-to-peak BrAC and TAC was longer for women than men. The congruence between peak TAC and BrAC increased as a function of the beers consumed. No sex difference in the time lag between peak BrAC and TAC was detected.
CONCLUSIONS: The congruence between TAC and BrAC and time lags between TAC and BrAC are related to the number of beers consumed. Peak values of TAC and BrAC became more congruent with higher doses but the time lag increased as a function of the amount of alcohol consumed. SHORT
SUMMARY: The time delay (or lag) and congruence between transdermal vs. BrACs increases as the number of beers increases. Though sex differences are evident in peak transdermal and BrACs, no sex differences were evident in the time lag and the congruence between transdermal and breath alcohol concentrations.
© The Author 2016. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27522029      PMCID: PMC5169032          DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agw058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  21 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics of ethanol: a review of the methodology.

Authors:  Hiroshi Matsumoto; Yuko Fukui
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Studies on a wearable, electronic, transdermal alcohol sensor.

Authors:  R M Swift; C S Martin; L Swette; A LaConti; N Kackley
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Towards a national model for managing impaired driving offenders.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; Robert L DuPont; Stephen K Talpins; Corinne L Shea
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Estimating BrAC from transdermal alcohol concentration data using the BrAC estimator software program.

Authors:  Susan E Luczak; I Gary Rosen
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Validity of transdermal alcohol monitoring: fixed and self-regulated dosing.

Authors:  Joseph T Sakai; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Robert J Long; Thomas J Crowley
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Contingency management for alcohol use reduction: a pilot study using a transdermal alcohol sensor.

Authors:  Nancy P Barnett; Jennifer Tidey; James G Murphy; Robert Swift; Suzanne M Colby
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Comparing the detection of transdermal and breath alcohol concentrations during periods of alcohol consumption ranging from moderate drinking to binge drinking.

Authors:  Donald M Dougherty; Nora E Charles; Ashley Acheson; Samantha John; R Michael Furr; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Accounting for sex-related differences in the estimation of breath alcohol concentrations using transdermal alcohol monitoring.

Authors:  Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; John D Roache; Yuanyuan Liang; Tara E Karns; Sharon E Cates; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Field and laboratory alcohol detection with 2 types of transdermal devices.

Authors:  Paul R Marques; A Scott McKnight
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  The Potential Clinical Utility of Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring Data to Estimate the Number of Alcoholic Drinks Consumed.

Authors:  Donald M Dougherty; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Yuanyuan Liang; Tara E Karns; Sarah L Lake; Sharon E Cates; John D Roache
Journal:  Addict Disord Their Treat       Date:  2015-09
View more
  23 in total

1.  Wearable Electrochemical Alcohol Biosensors.

Authors:  Alan S Campbell; Jayoung Kim; Joseph Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Electrochem       Date:  2018-05-23

2.  Obtaining continuous BrAC/BAC estimates in the field: A hybrid system integrating transdermal alcohol biosensor, Intellidrink smartphone app, and BrAC Estimator software tools.

Authors:  Susan E Luczak; Ashley L Hawkins; Zheng Dai; Raphael Wichmann; Chunming Wang; I Gary Rosen
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Estimating the quantity and time course of alcohol consumption from transdermal alcohol sensor data: A combined laboratory-ambulatory study.

Authors:  Catharine E Fairbairn; I Gary Rosen; Susan E Luczak; Walter J Venerable
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.405

4.  Processing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) data to detect low-level drinking.

Authors:  John D Roache; Tara E Karns-Wright; Martin Goros; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Charles W Mathias; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 5.  Outcome Assessment in Trials of Pharmacological Treatments for Alcohol Use Disorders: Fair and Strict Testing.

Authors:  Susanne Rösner; Michael Soyka
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Can an app help identify psychomotor function impairments during drinking occasions in the real world? A mixed-method pilot study.

Authors:  Brian Suffoletto; Akash Goyal; Juan Carlos Puyana; Tammy Chung
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.716

7.  The Association Between Negative and Positive Affect and Alcohol Use: An Ambulatory Study.

Authors:  Konrad Bresin; Catharine E Fairbairn
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 8.  Mobile alcohol biosensors and pharmacotherapy development research.

Authors:  Walter Roberts; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  A Discreet Wearable IoT Sensor for Continuous Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring - Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Baichen Li; R Scott Downen; Quan Dong; Nam Tran; Maxine LeSaux; Andrew C Meltzer; Zhenyu Li
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.301

10.  Effects of stomach content on the breath alcohol concentration-transdermal alcohol concentration relationship.

Authors:  Emily B Saldich; Chunming Wang; I Gary Rosen; Jay Bartroff; Susan E Luczak
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2021-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.