Literature DB >> 30748019

Assessment of Alcohol Use in the Natural Environment.

Thomas M Piasecki1.   

Abstract

The current article critically reviews 3 methodological options for assessing drinking episodes in the natural environment. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) typically involves using mobile devices to collect self-report data from participants in daily life. This technique is now widely used in alcohol research, but investigators have implemented diverse assessment strategies. This article focuses on "high-resolution" EMA protocols that oversample experiences and behaviors within individual drinking episodes. A number of approaches have been used to accomplish this, including using signaled follow-ups tied to drinking initiation, asking participants to log entries before and after individual drinks or drinking episodes, and delivering frequent signaled assessments during periods of the day when alcohol use is most common. Transdermal alcohol sensors (TAS) are devices that are worn continuously and are capable of detecting alcohol eliminated through the skin. These methods are appealing because they do not rely upon drinkers' self-report. Studies using TAS have been appearing with greater frequency over the past several years. New methods are making the use of TAS more tractable by permitting back-translation of transdermal alcohol concentration data to more familiar estimates of blood alcohol concentration or breath alcohol concentration. However, the current generation of devices can have problems with missing data and tend to be relatively insensitive to low-level drinking. An emerging area of research investigates the possibility of using mobile device data and machine learning to passively detect the user's drinking, with promising early findings. EMA, TAS, and sensor-based approaches are all valid, and tend to produce convergent information when used in conjunction with one another. Each has a unique profile of advantages, disadvantages, and threats to validity. Therefore, the nature of the underlying research question must dictate the method(s) investigators select.
© 2019 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological Momentary Assessment; Machine Learning; Transdermal Alcohol Sensor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30748019      PMCID: PMC6443469          DOI: 10.1111/acer.13975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  99 in total

1.  One too many: predicting future alcohol consumption following heavy drinking.

Authors:  Mark Muraven; R Lorraine Collins; Elizabeth T Morsheimer; Saul Shiffman; Jean A Paty
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Validity of transdermal alcohol monitoring: fixed and self-regulated dosing.

Authors:  Joseph T Sakai; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Robert J Long; Thomas J Crowley
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki; Michael R Hufford; Marika Solhan; Timothy J Trull
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2007-03

4.  Development of a real-time repeated-measures assessment protocol to capture change over the course of a drinking episode.

Authors:  Susan E Luczak; I Gary Rosen; Tamara L Wall
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  Accounting for sex-related differences in the estimation of breath alcohol concentrations using transdermal alcohol monitoring.

Authors:  Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; John D Roache; Yuanyuan Liang; Tara E Karns; Sharon E Cates; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Alcohol consumption as a predictor of reactivity to smoking and stress cues presented in the natural environment of smokers.

Authors:  Rachel L Tomko; Michael E Saladin; Erin A McClure; Lindsay M Squeglia; Matthew J Carpenter; Stephen T Tiffany; Nathaniel L Baker; Kevin M Gray
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Biobehavioral mechanisms of topiramate's effects on alcohol use: an investigation pairing laboratory and ecological momentary assessments.

Authors:  Robert Miranda; James MacKillop; Hayley Treloar; Alexander Blanchard; Jennifer W Tidey; Robert M Swift; Thomas Chun; Damaris J Rohsenow; Peter M Monti
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Emotion differentiation as resilience against excessive alcohol use: an ecological momentary assessment in underage social drinkers.

Authors:  Todd B Kashdan; Patty Ferssizidis; R Lorraine Collins; Mark Muraven
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-08-09

9.  Measured alcohol content in college party mixed drinks.

Authors:  Nancy P Barnett; Jill Wei; Cristine Czachowski
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-03

10.  The accuracy and promise of personal breathalysers for research: Steps toward a cost-effective reliable measure of alcohol intoxication?

Authors:  Benjamin C Riordan; Damian Scarf; Saleh Moradi; Jayde A M Flett; Kate B Carey; Tamlin S Conner
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2017-12-20
View more
  24 in total

1.  Examining protocol compliance and self-report congruence between daily diaries and event-contingent ecological momentary assessments of college student drinking.

Authors:  Brittney A Hultgren; Nichole M Scaglione; Alex Buben; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  Translational approach to understanding momentary factors associated with alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Valentina Vengeliene; Jerome Clifford Foo; Jinhyuk Kim
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Trajectories of state impulsivity domains before and after alcohol consumption in the naturalistic environment.

Authors:  Joseph A Wonderlich; Brooke S G Molina; Sarah L Pedersen
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Alcohol craving and withdrawal at treatment entry prospectively predict alcohol use outcomes during outpatient treatment.

Authors:  Jorge S Martins; Nia Fogelman; Stephanie Wemm; Seungju Hwang; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Event-Level Predictors of Alcohol-Impaired Driving Intentions.

Authors:  Courtney A Motschman; Laura E Hatz; Kayleigh N McCarty; Edgar C Merkle; Timothy J Trull; Denis M McCarthy
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Measuring subjective alcohol effects in daily life using contemporary young adult language.

Authors:  Ashley N Linden-Carmichael; Brian H Calhoun
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Transdermal sensor features correlate with ecological momentary assessment drinking reports and predict alcohol-related consequences in young adults' natural settings.

Authors:  Michael A Russell; Robert J Turrisi; Joshua M Smyth
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Testing affect regulation models of drinking prior to and after drinking initiation using ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Jimikaye B Courtney; Michael A Russell
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2021-06-17

9.  Alcohol use in daily life: Examining the role of trait and state impulsivity facets.

Authors:  Sarah A Griffin; Timothy J Trull
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2020-09-10

10.  Ecological Momentary Assessment of Alcohol Consumption and Its Concordance with Transdermal Alcohol Detection and Timeline Follow-Back Self-report Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.

Authors:  Eun-Young Mun; Xiaoyin Li; Michael S Businelle; Emily T Hébert; Zhengqi Tan; Nancy P Barnett; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.