| Literature DB >> 30177554 |
Marek Kozlowski1, David Corujo2,3, Michael Hothorn4, Iva Guberovic2, Imke K Mandemaker1, Charlotte Blessing1, Judith Sporn4, Arturo Gutierrez-Triana4, Rebecca Smith1, Thomas Portmann4, Mathias Treier4, Klaus Scheffzek4, Sebastien Huet5, Gyula Timinszky1, Marcus Buschbeck6,7, Andreas G Ladurner8,9,10.
Abstract
MacroH2A histone variants suppress tumor progression and act as epigenetic barriers to induced pluripotency. How they impart their influence on chromatin plasticity is not well understood. Here, we analyze how the different domains of macroH2A proteins contribute to chromatin structure and dynamics. By solving the crystal structure of the macrodomain of human macroH2A2 at 1.7 Å, we find that its putative binding pocket exhibits marked structural differences compared with the macroH2A1.1 isoform, rendering macroH2A2 unable to bind ADP-ribose. Quantitative binding assays show that this specificity is conserved among vertebrate macroH2A isoforms. We further find that macroH2A histones reduce the transient, PARP1-dependent chromatin relaxation that occurs in living cells upon DNA damage through two distinct mechanisms. First, macroH2A1.1 mediates an isoform-specific effect through its ability to suppress PARP1 activity. Second, the unstructured linker region exerts an additional repressive effect that is common to all macroH2A proteins. In the absence of DNA damage, the macroH2A linker is also sufficient for rescuing heterochromatin architecture in cells deficient for macroH2A.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; PARP1; heterochromatin; histone variants; macroH2A
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30177554 PMCID: PMC6172464 DOI: 10.15252/embr.201744445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EMBO Rep ISSN: 1469-221X Impact factor: 8.807