AIMS: Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing after renal transplantation is individualized through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Home-based dried blood spot (DBS) sampling has the potential to replace conventional TDM sampling at the clinic. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed to quantify tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in DBS and clinically validated for abbreviated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) monitoring using an innovative volumetric DBS sampling device. METHODS: Clinical validation was performed by direct comparison of paired DBS and whole blood (WB) (tacrolimus) and plasma (mycophenolic acid) concentrations and AUCs. Agreement was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis and DBS-to-WB predictive performance. TDM dosing recommendations based on both methods were compared to assess clinical impact. RESULTS: Paired tacrolimus (n = 200) and mycophenolic acid (n = 192) DBS and WB samples were collected from 65 kidney(-pancreas) transplant recipients. Differences for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid were within ±20% for 84.5% and 76.6% of concentrations and 90.5% and 90.7% of AUCs, respectively. Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing recommendation differences occurred on 44.4% and 4.7% of occasions. Tacrolimus DBS dosing recommendations were 0.35 ± 0.14 mg higher than for WB and 8 ± 3% of the initial dose. Mycophenolic acid DBS dosing recommendations were 23.3 ± 31.9 mg lower than for plasma and 2 ± 3.5% of the initial dose. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid TDM for outpatient renal transplant recipients, based on abbreviated AUC collected with a DBS sampling device, is comparable to conventional TDM based on WB sampling. Patient training and guidance on good blood-spotting practices is essential to ensure method feasibility.
AIMS: Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing after renal transplantation is individualized through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Home-based dried blood spot (DBS) sampling has the potential to replace conventional TDM sampling at the clinic. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed to quantify tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in DBS and clinically validated for abbreviated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) monitoring using an innovative volumetric DBS sampling device. METHODS: Clinical validation was performed by direct comparison of paired DBS and whole blood (WB) (tacrolimus) and plasma (mycophenolic acid) concentrations and AUCs. Agreement was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis and DBS-to-WB predictive performance. TDM dosing recommendations based on both methods were compared to assess clinical impact. RESULTS: Paired tacrolimus (n = 200) and mycophenolic acid (n = 192) DBS and WB samples were collected from 65 kidney(-pancreas) transplant recipients. Differences for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid were within ±20% for 84.5% and 76.6% of concentrations and 90.5% and 90.7% of AUCs, respectively. Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing recommendation differences occurred on 44.4% and 4.7% of occasions. TacrolimusDBS dosing recommendations were 0.35 ± 0.14 mg higher than for WB and 8 ± 3% of the initial dose. Mycophenolic acidDBS dosing recommendations were 23.3 ± 31.9 mg lower than for plasma and 2 ± 3.5% of the initial dose. CONCLUSIONS:Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid TDM for outpatient renal transplant recipients, based on abbreviated AUC collected with a DBS sampling device, is comparable to conventional TDM based on WB sampling. Patient training and guidance on good blood-spotting practices is essential to ensure method feasibility.
Authors: Lisa C Martial; Karin E J Hoogtanders; Michiel F Schreuder; Elisabeth A Cornelissen; Jac van der Heijden; Manuela A Joore; Erik M Van Maarseveen; David M Burger; Sander Croes; Roger J M Brüggemann; Rob E Aarnoutse Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jennifer Le; Brenda Poindexter; Janice E Sullivan; Matthew Laughon; Paula Delmore; Martha Blackford; Ram Yogev; Laura P James; Chiara Melloni; Barrie Harper; Jeff Mitchell; Daniel K Benjamin; Felix Boakye-Agyeman; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: D J A R Moes; S A S van der Bent; J J Swen; T van der Straaten; A Inderson; E Olofsen; H W Verspaget; H J Guchelaar; J den Hartigh; B van Hoek Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Tom C Zwart; Sumit R M Gokoel; Paul J M van der Boog; Johan W de Fijter; Dina M Kweekel; Jesse J Swen; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Dirk Jan A R Moes Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Natacha S Ogando; Erik Metscher; Dirk Jan A R Moes; Eline J Arends; Ali Tas; Jennifer Cross; Eric J Snijder; Y K Onno Teng; Aiko P J de Vries; Martijn J van Hemert Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Sylvia D Klomp; Soufian Meziyerh; Maurits F J M Vissers; Dirk J A R Moes; Eline J Arends; Y K Onno Teng; Jesse J Swen; Aiko P J de Vries Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Scott C Bell; Marcus A Mall; Hector Gutierrez; Milan Macek; Susan Madge; Jane C Davies; Pierre-Régis Burgel; Elizabeth Tullis; Claudio Castaños; Carlo Castellani; Catherine A Byrnes; Fiona Cathcart; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Rebecca Cosgriff; Irmgard Eichler; Isabelle Fajac; Christopher H Goss; Pavel Drevinek; Philip M Farrell; Anna M Gravelle; Trudy Havermans; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Eitan Kerem; Joseph L Mathew; Edward F McKone; Lutz Naehrlich; Samya Z Nasr; Gabriela R Oates; Ciaran O'Neill; Ulrike Pypops; Karen S Raraigh; Steven M Rowe; Kevin W Southern; Sheila Sivam; Anne L Stephenson; Marco Zampoli; Felix Ratjen Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Paola Krall; Dominique Yañez; Angélica Rojo; Ángela Delucchi; Miguel Córdova; Jorge Morales; Pía Boza; Alonso de la Rivera; Natalie Espinoza; Natalia Armijo; Luis E Castañeda; Mauricio J Farfán; Carolina Salas Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: David K Metz; Nick Holford; Joshua Y Kausman; Amanda Walker; Noel Cranswick; Christine E Staatz; Katherine A Barraclough; Francesco Ierino Journal: Transplantation Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Tanja R Zijp; Zamrotul Izzah; Daan J Touw; Job F M van Boven; Christoffer Åberg; C Tji Gan; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Lisa C Martial; Maaike Biewenga; Bastian N Ruijter; Ron Keizer; Jesse J Swen; Bart van Hoek; Dirk Jan A R Moes Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 4.335