Literature DB >> 30169599

Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance.

André L Mallmann1, Felipe B Betiolo1, Elisar Camilloti1, Ana Paula G Mellagi1, Rafael R Ulguim1, Ivo Wentz1, Mari Lourdes Bernardi2, Marcio A D Gonçalves3, Rafael Kummer4, Fernando P Bortolozzo1.   

Abstract

The increase in the litter size in past decades has caused reduction in the individual piglet birth weight. Therefore, nutritional strategies employed in the last third of gestation in order to improve the piglet birth weight have been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 2 different feeding levels (1.8 and 2.2 kg/d) in the last third of gestation on the piglet birth weight and the female reproductive performance. A total of 407 females were fed on a diet based on corn-soybean meal (3.25 Mcal ME per kg and 0.65% standardized ileal digestible lysine) from day 90 of gestation until farrowing. The females were weighed on day 90 and day 112 of gestation, and at weaning. Born alive and stillborn piglets were weighed within 12 h of birth. The lactation feed intake and the litter growth rate were measured in a randomly selected subsample of 53 sows from each treatment. The data were analyzed using the generalized linear mixed models, considering the females as the experimental unit. Parity, treatment, and their interaction were analyzed for all responses. The females fed on 2.2 kg/d of diet from day 90 to day 112 exhibited greater body weight gain compared to the females fed on 1.8 kg/d (P < 0.001). No evidence of the effects of feeding levels on the individual piglet birth weight and on the within-litter CV were observed, for both gilts and sows (P ≥ 0.90). Similarly, when the classes of the total born piglets were considered in the analysis (<15 and ≥15 for gilts; <16 and ≥16 for sows), no positive effects of increasing the feeding level were observed on the individual piglet birth weight and the within-litter CV (P ≥ 0.47). Also, no differences in the stillborn rate, mummified-fetus rate, and percentage of piglets weighing less than 1,000 g at birth were observed between the treatments (P ≥ 0.28). The females fed on 1.8 kg/d of diet exhibited greater feed intake during lactation, compared to the females fed on 2.2 kg/d (P < 0.05). Weaning weight, weaning-to-estrus interval, subsequent litter size, and culling rate were not affected by the dietary levels (P ≥ 0.23). In conclusion, increasing the feed intake from day 90 of gestation until farrowing increased the body weight gain in sow, demonstrated no effect on the piglet birth weight, and reduced the lactation feed intake. Furthermore, there was no evidence of the effects of the treatments on the litter growth rate or on the subsequent female reproductive performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30169599      PMCID: PMC6162569          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  21 in total

1.  Effects of lactation feed intake and creep feeding on sow and piglet performance.

Authors:  R C Sulabo; J Y Jacela; M D Tokach; S S Dritz; R D Goodband; J M DeRouchey; J L Nelssen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Embryonic and fetal development in a commercial dam-line genotype.

Authors:  S C Town; J L Patterson; C Z Pereira; G Gourley; G R Foxcroft
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance.

Authors:  M G Young; M D Tokach; F X Aherne; R G Main; S S Dritz; R D Goodband; J L Nelssen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Insulin sensitivity during pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning in primiparous gilts.

Authors:  M-C Père; M Etienne
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Nutrient uptake of the uterus during the last third of pregnancy in sows: Effects of litter size, gestation stage and maternal glycemia.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Père; Michel Etienne
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.145

6.  Feed intake pattern during lactation and subsequent reproductive performance of sows.

Authors:  Y Koketsu; G D Dial; J E Pettigrew; V L King
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Neonatal piglet survival: impact of sow nutrition around parturition on fetal glycogen deposition and production and composition of colostrum and transient milk.

Authors:  P K Theil; C Lauridsen; H Quesnel
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of amino acids and energy intake during late gestation of high-performing gilts and sows on litter and reproductive performance under commercial conditions.

Authors:  M A D Gonçalves; K M Gourley; S S Dritz; M D Tokach; N M Bello; J M DeRouchey; J C Woodworth; R D Goodband
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Restricted feed intake in lactating primiparous sows. I. Effects on sow metabolic state and subsequent reproductive performance.

Authors:  J L Patterson; M N Smit; S Novak; A P Wellen; G R Foxcroft
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Effects of additional feed during late gestation on reproductive performance of sows: a cooperative study.

Authors:  G L Cromwell; D D Hall; A J Clawson; G E Combs; D A Knabe; C V Maxwell; P R Noland; D E Orr; T J Prince
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of increased energy and amino acid intake in late gestation on reproductive performance, milk composition, metabolic, and redox status of sows1.

Authors:  Lianqiang Che; Liang Hu; Ceng Wu; Qin Xu; Qiang Zhou; Xie Peng; Zengfeng Fang; Yan Lin; Shenyu Xu; Bin Feng; Jian Li; Jiayong Tang; Reinan Zhang; Hua Li; Peter Kappel Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Impact of feed intake during late gestation on piglet birth weight and reproductive performance: a dose-response study performed in gilts.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Elisar Camilotti; Deivison P Fagundes; Carlos E Vier; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Márcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Maternal nutrition during early and late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impacts on maternal growth and litter traits1.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Deivison P Fagundes; Carlos E Vier; Gabriela S Oliveira; Ana P G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Mari L Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Ricardo J Cogo; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effects of increased lysine and energy feeding duration prior to parturition on sow and litter performance, piglet survival, and colostrum quality.

Authors:  Kiah M Gourley; Analicia J Swanson; Joel M DeRouchey; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Does Ad Libitum Feeding during the Peri-Partum Improve the Sow Feed Intake and Performances?

Authors:  Laura Martí; María Ángeles Latorre; Javier Álvarez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effect of spray-dried porcine plasma in peripartum sow feed on subsequent litter size.

Authors:  Joe Crenshaw; Laura Lafoz Del Río; Luis Sanjoaquin; Simon Tibble; Francesc González-Solé; David Solà-Oriol; Carmen Rodriguez; Joy Campbell; Javier Polo
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 7.  Management and Feeding Strategies in Early Life to Increase Piglet Performance and Welfare around Weaning: A Review.

Authors:  Laia Blavi; David Solà-Oriol; Pol Llonch; Sergi López-Vergé; Susana María Martín-Orúe; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.