Literature DB >> 31742334

Maternal nutrition during early and late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impacts on maternal growth and litter traits1.

André L Mallmann1, Deivison P Fagundes1, Carlos E Vier1, Gabriela S Oliveira1, Ana P G Mellagi1, Rafael R Ulguim1, Mari L Bernardi2, Uislei A D Orlando3, Ricardo J Cogo4, Fernando P Bortolozzo1.   

Abstract

The effects of two different feeding levels, offered in two phases during gestation, on body measurements and litter traits were evaluated in 152 gilts and 551 sows. The treatments consisted of the combination of two gestation phases (phase 1-days 22 to 42; phase 2-days 90 to 110) and two feed amounts (1.8 or 3.5 kg/d). Females were weighed on days 22, 42, 90, and 110 of gestation. Born alive and stillborn piglets were weighed within 12 h of birth. Total placental efficiency (ratio between litter weight and total placental weight) was measured in 518 females. Variables concerning body measurements at days 42 and 90 of gestation were analyzed considering the effects of feed amount, parity order (PO) and its interaction as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Body measurements at day 110 of gestation and litter traits were analyzed considering the effects of feed amounts in phase 1, feed amounts in phase 2, PO and their interactions, as a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. As expected, BW, backfat, and caliper units were greater at days 42, 90, and 110 (P ≤ 0.006) for females fed 3.5 kg/d during the previous phase than those fed 1.8 kg. No differences were observed among feed levels in total number of piglets born, mummified fetuses, sum of born alive and stillborn piglets, and within-litter birth weight CV (P ≥ 0.118). The percentage of stillborn piglets was affected by a three-way interaction (feed level at phase 1 × feed level at phase 2 × PO). Gilts fed 1.8 kg/d at phase 1 and 3.5 kg/d at phase 2 had fewer stillborn piglets than the other females (P ≤ 0.004). Birth weight was not affected by feed levels (P ≥ 0.153); however, sows had heavier piglets than gilts (P < 0.001). Females fed 3.5 kg/d during phase 2 tended to have heavier litters (P = 0.054) than those fed 1.8 kg/d. Feeding a high level at phase 2 reduced the occurrence of lightweight piglets in gilts, but not in sows (feed level phase 2 × PO; P = 0.031). Total placental weight, average placental weight, and total placental efficiency were not affected by feed level at phase 1, feed level at phase 2 or interactions (P > 0.14). Sows had total placental weight and average placental weight greater (P ≤ 0.003) than gilts. In conclusion, increasing feed intake during phase 1, phase 2, or both phases resulted in increased maternal BW gain, without expressive effects on litter traits. Feeding 3.5 kg/d to gilts during phase 2 reduced the occurrence of lightweight piglets.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  birth weight; feeding; gilts; reproduction; sows

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742334      PMCID: PMC6915219          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  23 in total

1.  Economic weights for maternal traits of sows, including sow longevity.

Authors:  P R Amer; C I Ludemann; S Hermesch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Maternal nutrition and fetal development.

Authors:  Guoyao Wu; Fuller W Bazer; Timothy A Cudd; Cynthia J Meininger; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  Nutritional interventions to prevent and rear low-birthweight piglets.

Authors:  M De Vos; L Che; V Huygelen; S Willemen; J Michiels; S Van Cruchten; C Van Ginneken
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.130

4.  Effect of different feeding levels during three short periods of gestation on sow and litter performance over two reproductive cycles.

Authors:  P Ren; X J Yang; J S Kim; D Menon; S K Baidoo
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.145

5.  Impact of feed intake during late gestation on piglet birth weight and reproductive performance: a dose-response study performed in gilts.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Elisar Camilotti; Deivison P Fagundes; Carlos E Vier; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Márcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Felipe B Betiolo; Elisar Camilloti; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Ivo Wentz; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Marcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Relationships between ovulation rate and embryonic and placental characteristics in multiparous sows at 35 days of pregnancy.

Authors:  C L A Da Silva; H van den Brand; B F A Laurenssen; M L W J Broekhuijse; E F Knol; B Kemp; N M Soede
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Novel insight into the control of litter size in pigs, using placental efficiency as a selection tool.

Authors:  M E Wilson; N J Biensen; S P Ford
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Increased maternal nutrition of sows has no beneficial effects on muscle fiber number or postnatal growth and has no impact on the meat quality of the offspring.

Authors:  P M Nissen; V O Danielsen; P F Jorgensen; N Oksbjerg
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  Prenatal programming of postnatal development in the pig.

Authors:  G R Foxcroft; W T Dixon; M K Dyck; S Novak; J C S Harding; F C R L Almeida
Journal:  Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  2009
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach.

Authors:  John F Patience; Alejandro Ramirez
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Gilt development to improve offspring performance and survivability.

Authors:  Jamil E G Faccin; Mike D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Joel M DeRouchey; Jason C Woodworth; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Effects of increased lysine and energy feeding duration prior to parturition on sow and litter performance, piglet survival, and colostrum quality.

Authors:  Kiah M Gourley; Analicia J Swanson; Joel M DeRouchey; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.