Literature DB >> 20495122

Effects of lactation feed intake and creep feeding on sow and piglet performance.

R C Sulabo1, J Y Jacela, M D Tokach, S S Dritz, R D Goodband, J M DeRouchey, J L Nelssen.   

Abstract

A total of 84 sows (PIC Line 1050) were blocked according to day of farrowing and parity and allotted in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with lactation feed intake (ad libitum vs. restricted) and creep feeding (no vs. yes) as factors. Sows fed for ad libitum intake (ad libitum-fed) were allowed free access to a common lactation diet (3,503 kcal of ME/kg, 0.97% standardized ileal digestible Lys), and sows with restricted intake (restricted-fed) were fed 25% less than ad libitum-fed sows. A creep diet (3,495 ME/kg, 1.56% standardized ileal digestible Lys) with 1.0% chromic oxide was offered to creep-fed pigs from d 3 to 21. Fecal samples from creep-fed pigs were taken with sterile swabs on d 7, 14, and 21, and color was assessed to categorize pigs as eaters or non-eaters. There were no interactions (P > 0.15) between lactation feed intake and creep feeding. Ad libitum-fed sows had greater (P < 0.01) total feed intake and ADFI (99.4, 4.9 kg) than restricted-fed sows (67.9, 3.6 kg). Ad libitum-fed sows had reduced BW loss (-15 vs. -24 kg; P < 0.01), improved total (46.7 vs. 43.0 kg; P < 0.04) and daily (2.56 vs. 2.36 kg; P < 0.04) BW gains of litters, and increased (90 vs. 71%; P < 0.03) percentage of sows returning to estrus by d 14 compared with restricted-fed sows. Creep feeding for 18 d did not affect (P > 0.34) sow BW and backfat loss but increased days to estrus (5.4 vs. 4.9 d; P < 0.03). Creep feeding had no (P > 0.16) effect on preweaning growth performance. Postweaning performance of creep-fed and non-creep-fed pigs was similar (P > 0.86). When individual pigs were categorized on the basis of creep feed consumption category, eaters had greater (P < 0.05) ADG (393, 376, and 378 g) and total BW gains (11.0, 10.5, and 10.6 kg) than non-eaters or non-creep-fed pigs. In conclusion, creep feeding for 18 d did not affect preweaning and lactating sow performance. Low feed intake during lactation negatively affected sow and litter performance. Creating more creep-feed eaters during the lactation period may benefit postweaning performance. Therefore, dietary and nondietary factors that can enhance the proportion of eaters in litters should be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495122     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Impact of feed intake during late gestation on piglet birth weight and reproductive performance: a dose-response study performed in gilts.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Elisar Camilotti; Deivison P Fagundes; Carlos E Vier; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Uislei A D Orlando; Márcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Two different feeding levels during late gestation in gilts and sows under commercial conditions: impact on piglet birth weight and female reproductive performance.

Authors:  André L Mallmann; Felipe B Betiolo; Elisar Camilloti; Ana Paula G Mellagi; Rafael R Ulguim; Ivo Wentz; Mari Lourdes Bernardi; Marcio A D Gonçalves; Rafael Kummer; Fernando P Bortolozzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of dietary fiber sources during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, milk quality, and intestinal health in piglets1.

Authors:  Qinghui Shang; Hansuo Liu; Sujie Liu; Tengfei He; Xiangshu Piao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The effect of creep feed intake and starter diet allowance on piglets' gut structure and growth performance after weaning.

Authors:  Ramon Muns; Elizabeth Magowan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Excessive backfat of sows at 109 d of gestation induces lipotoxic placental environment and is associated with declining reproductive performance.

Authors:  Yuanfei Zhou; Tao Xu; Anle Cai; Yinghui Wu; Hongkui Wei; Siwen Jiang; Jian Peng
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Characterization of energy and performance of swine fed a novel corn-soybean extruded product.

Authors:  Katherine M Koch; Robert C Thaler; Sam K Baidoo; Crystal L Levesque; Rebecca C Bott
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-16

7.  Mammary cell proliferation and catabolism of adipose tissues in nutrition-restricted lactating sows were associated with extracellular high glutamate levels.

Authors:  Heju Zhong; Peng Wang; Yumo Song; Xiaoling Zhang; Lianqiang Che; Bin Feng; Yan Lin; Shengyu Xu; Jian Li; Qiaofeng Wu; Zhengfeng Fang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-05

8.  Pigs Like It Varied; Feeding Behavior and Pre- and Post-weaning Performance of Piglets Exposed to Dietary Diversity and Feed Hidden in Substrate During Lactation.

Authors:  Anouschka Middelkoop; Manon A van Marwijk; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-11-19

9.  Feed intake of the sow and playful creep feeding of piglets influence piglet behaviour and performance before and after weaning.

Authors:  Anouschka Middelkoop; Natasja Costermans; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of different creep feed types on pre-weaning and post-weaning performance and gut development.

Authors:  Pil Seung Heo; Dong Hyuk Kim; Jae Cheol Jang; Jin Su Hong; Yoo Yong Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.