Literature DB >> 30167812

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade.

Ceyda Turan Bektas1, Burak Kocak2, Aytul Hande Yardimci1, Mehmet Hamza Turkcanoglu3, Ugur Yucetas4, Sevim Baykal Koca5, Cagri Erdim1, Ozgur Kilickesmez1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of quantitative computed tomography (CT) texture analysis using different machine learning (ML) classifiers for discriminating low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinomas (cc-RCCs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 53 patients with pathologically proven 54 cc-RCCs (31 low-grade [grade 1 or 2]; 23 high-grade [grade 3 or 4]). In one patient, two synchronous cc-RCCs were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.5 years. Thirty-four (64.1%) patients were male and 19 were female (35.9%). Mean tumour size based on the maximum diameter was 57.4 mm (range, 16-145 mm). Forty patients underwent radical nephrectomy and 13 underwent partial nephrectomy. Following pre-processing steps, two-dimensional CT texture features were extracted using portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Reproducibility of texture features was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Nested cross-validation with a wrapper-based algorithm was used in feature selection and model optimisation. The ML classifiers were support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP, a sort of neural network), naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbours, and random forest. The performance of the classifiers was compared by certain metrics.
RESULTS: Among 279 texture features, 241 features with an ICC equal to or higher than 0.80 (excellent reproducibility) were included in the further feature selection process. The best model was created using SVM. The selected subset of features for SVM included five co-occurrence matrix (ICC range, 0.885-0.998), three run-length matrix (ICC range, 0.889-0.992), one gradient (ICC = 0.998), and four Haar wavelet features (ICC range, 0.941-0.997). The overall accuracy, sensitivity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), specificity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), and overall area under the curve of the best model were 85.1%, 91.3%, 80.6%, and 0.860, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The ML-based CT texture analysis can be a useful and promising non-invasive method for prediction of low and high Fuhrman nuclear grade cc-RCCs. KEY POINTS: • Based on the percutaneous biopsy literature, ML-based CT texture analysis has a comparable predictive performance with percutaneous biopsy. • Highest predictive performance was obtained with use of the SVM. • SVM correctly classified 85.1% of cc-RCCs in terms of nuclear grade, with an AUC of 0.860.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; Fuhrman nuclear grade; Machine learning; Multidetector computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30167812     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5698-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  38 in total

1.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification.

Authors:  G Collewet; M Strzelecki; F Mariette
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  MaZda--a software package for image texture analysis.

Authors:  Piotr M Szczypiński; Michał Strzelecki; Andrzej Materka; Artur Klepaczko
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Comparison of standardized and nonstandardized nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma to predict outcome among 2,042 patients.

Authors:  Christine M Lohse; Michael L Blute; Horst Zincke; Amy L Weaver; John C Cheville
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Prognostic role of Fuhrman grade and vascular endothelial growth factor in pT1a clear cell carcinoma in partial nephrectomy specimens.

Authors:  D Minardi; G Lucarini; R Mazzucchelli; G Milanese; D Natali; A B Galosi; R Montironi; G Biagini; G Muzzonigro
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Mathematical model to predict individual survival for patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Amnon Zisman; Allan J Pantuck; Fredrick Dorey; Debby H Chao; Barbara J Gitlitz; Nancy Moldawer; Dana Lazarovici; Jean B deKernion; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma--a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Brian L Egleston; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Tumor size does not predict risk of metastatic disease or prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Jean-Jacques Patard; Michela de Martino; Karim Bensalah; Gregory Verhoest; Alexandre de la Taille; Clément-Claude Abbou; Ernst Peter Allhoff; Giuseppe Carrieri; Stephen B Riggs; Fairooz F Kabbinavar; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score.

Authors:  Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Contemporary results of percutaneous biopsy of 100 small renal masses: a single center experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Kamal Mattar; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew J Evans; William R Geddie; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review.

Authors:  Kiran Gupta; Jeffrey D Miller; Jim Z Li; Mason W Russell; Claudie Charbonneau
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  42 in total

1.  Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.

Authors:  Yansheng Kan; Qing Zhang; Jiange Hao; Wei Wang; Junlong Zhuang; Jie Gao; Haifeng Huang; Jing Liang; Giancarlo Marra; Giorgio Calleris; Marco Oderda; Xiaozhi Zhao; Paolo Gontero; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of segmentation margin on machine learning-based high-dimensional quantitative CT texture analysis: a reproducibility study on renal clear cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Ece Ates; Emine Sebnem Durmaz; Melis Baykara Ulusan; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Preoperative prediction for pathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma via machine learning-based radiomics.

Authors:  Bing Mao; Lianzhong Zhang; Peigang Ning; Feng Ding; Fatian Wu; Gary Lu; Yayuan Geng; Jingdong Ma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners.

Authors:  Burak Koçak; Emine Şebnem Durmaz; Ece Ateş; Özgür Kılıçkesmez
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 6.  CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abhishta Bhandari; Muhammad Ibrahim; Chinmay Sharma; Rebecca Liong; Sonja Gustafson; Marita Prior
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-02

7.  MRI Radiomics for the Prediction of Fuhrman Grade in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Machine Learning Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Arnaldo Stanzione; Carlo Ricciardi; Renato Cuocolo; Valeria Romeo; Jessica Petrone; Michela Sarnataro; Pier Paolo Mainenti; Giovanni Improta; Filippo De Rosa; Luigi Insabato; Arturo Brunetti; Simone Maurea
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Stratification of cystic renal masses into benign and potentially malignant: applying machine learning to the bosniak classification.

Authors:  Nityanand Miskin; Lei Qin; Shanna A Matalon; Sree H Tirumani; Francesco Alessandrino; Stuart G Silverman; Atul B Shinagare
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-01

9.  Shape and texture-based radiomics signature on CT effectively discriminates benign from malignant renal masses.

Authors:  Felix Y Yap; Bino A Varghese; Steven Y Cen; Darryl H Hwang; Xiaomeng Lei; Bhushan Desai; Christopher Lau; Lindsay L Yang; Austin J Fullenkamp; Simin Hajian; Marielena Rivas; Megha Nayyar Gupta; Brian D Quinn; Manju Aron; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Assad A Oberai; Inderbir S Gill; Vinay A Duddalwar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Machine Learning Models to Predict the Fuhrman Nuclear Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shengsheng Lai; Lei Sun; Jialiang Wu; Ruili Wei; Shiwei Luo; Wenshuang Ding; Xilong Liu; Ruimeng Yang; Xin Zhen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.