Ceyda Turan Bektas1, Burak Kocak2, Aytul Hande Yardimci1, Mehmet Hamza Turkcanoglu3, Ugur Yucetas4, Sevim Baykal Koca5, Cagri Erdim1, Ozgur Kilickesmez1. 1. Department of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. drburakkocak@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Batman Women and Children's Health Training and Research Hospital, Batman, Turkey. 4. Department of Urology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Department of Pathology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of quantitative computed tomography (CT) texture analysis using different machine learning (ML) classifiers for discriminating low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinomas (cc-RCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 53 patients with pathologically proven 54 cc-RCCs (31 low-grade [grade 1 or 2]; 23 high-grade [grade 3 or 4]). In one patient, two synchronous cc-RCCs were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.5 years. Thirty-four (64.1%) patients were male and 19 were female (35.9%). Mean tumour size based on the maximum diameter was 57.4 mm (range, 16-145 mm). Forty patients underwent radical nephrectomy and 13 underwent partial nephrectomy. Following pre-processing steps, two-dimensional CT texture features were extracted using portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Reproducibility of texture features was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Nested cross-validation with a wrapper-based algorithm was used in feature selection and model optimisation. The ML classifiers were support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP, a sort of neural network), naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbours, and random forest. The performance of the classifiers was compared by certain metrics. RESULTS: Among 279 texture features, 241 features with an ICC equal to or higher than 0.80 (excellent reproducibility) were included in the further feature selection process. The best model was created using SVM. The selected subset of features for SVM included five co-occurrence matrix (ICC range, 0.885-0.998), three run-length matrix (ICC range, 0.889-0.992), one gradient (ICC = 0.998), and four Haar wavelet features (ICC range, 0.941-0.997). The overall accuracy, sensitivity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), specificity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), and overall area under the curve of the best model were 85.1%, 91.3%, 80.6%, and 0.860, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ML-based CT texture analysis can be a useful and promising non-invasive method for prediction of low and high Fuhrman nuclear grade cc-RCCs. KEY POINTS: • Based on the percutaneous biopsy literature, ML-based CT texture analysis has a comparable predictive performance with percutaneous biopsy. • Highest predictive performance was obtained with use of the SVM. • SVM correctly classified 85.1% of cc-RCCs in terms of nuclear grade, with an AUC of 0.860.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of quantitative computed tomography (CT) texture analysis using different machine learning (ML) classifiers for discriminating low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinomas (cc-RCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 53 patients with pathologically proven 54 cc-RCCs (31 low-grade [grade 1 or 2]; 23 high-grade [grade 3 or 4]). In one patient, two synchronous cc-RCCs were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.5 years. Thirty-four (64.1%) patients were male and 19 were female (35.9%). Mean tumour size based on the maximum diameter was 57.4 mm (range, 16-145 mm). Forty patients underwent radical nephrectomy and 13 underwent partial nephrectomy. Following pre-processing steps, two-dimensional CT texture features were extracted using portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Reproducibility of texture features was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Nested cross-validation with a wrapper-based algorithm was used in feature selection and model optimisation. The ML classifiers were support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP, a sort of neural network), naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbours, and random forest. The performance of the classifiers was compared by certain metrics. RESULTS: Among 279 texture features, 241 features with an ICC equal to or higher than 0.80 (excellent reproducibility) were included in the further feature selection process. The best model was created using SVM. The selected subset of features for SVM included five co-occurrence matrix (ICC range, 0.885-0.998), three run-length matrix (ICC range, 0.889-0.992), one gradient (ICC = 0.998), and four Haar wavelet features (ICC range, 0.941-0.997). The overall accuracy, sensitivity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), specificity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), and overall area under the curve of the best model were 85.1%, 91.3%, 80.6%, and 0.860, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ML-based CT texture analysis can be a useful and promising non-invasive method for prediction of low and high Fuhrman nuclear grade cc-RCCs. KEY POINTS: • Based on the percutaneous biopsy literature, ML-based CT texture analysis has a comparable predictive performance with percutaneous biopsy. • Highest predictive performance was obtained with use of the SVM. • SVM correctly classified 85.1% of cc-RCCs in terms of nuclear grade, with an AUC of 0.860.
Authors: Piotr M Szczypiński; Michał Strzelecki; Andrzej Materka; Artur Klepaczko Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2008-10-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: D Minardi; G Lucarini; R Mazzucchelli; G Milanese; D Natali; A B Galosi; R Montironi; G Biagini; G Muzzonigro Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Amnon Zisman; Allan J Pantuck; Fredrick Dorey; Debby H Chao; Barbara J Gitlitz; Nancy Moldawer; Dana Lazarovici; Jean B deKernion; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tobias Klatte; Jean-Jacques Patard; Michela de Martino; Karim Bensalah; Gregory Verhoest; Alexandre de la Taille; Clément-Claude Abbou; Ernst Peter Allhoff; Giuseppe Carrieri; Stephen B Riggs; Fairooz F Kabbinavar; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Alessandro Volpe; Kamal Mattar; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew J Evans; William R Geddie; Michael A S Jewett Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-10-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Kiran Gupta; Jeffrey D Miller; Jim Z Li; Mason W Russell; Claudie Charbonneau Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Nityanand Miskin; Lei Qin; Shanna A Matalon; Sree H Tirumani; Francesco Alessandrino; Stuart G Silverman; Atul B Shinagare Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: Felix Y Yap; Bino A Varghese; Steven Y Cen; Darryl H Hwang; Xiaomeng Lei; Bhushan Desai; Christopher Lau; Lindsay L Yang; Austin J Fullenkamp; Simin Hajian; Marielena Rivas; Megha Nayyar Gupta; Brian D Quinn; Manju Aron; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Assad A Oberai; Inderbir S Gill; Vinay A Duddalwar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 5.315