Literature DB >> 30167751

Preoperative sonographic measurement can accurately predict quadrupled hamstring tendon graft diameter for ACL reconstruction.

Tetsuya Takenaga1, Masahito Yoshida1, Marcio Albers1, Kanto Nagai1, Tomomasa Nakamura1, Freddie H Fu1, Kentaro Onishi2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies reported sonography was inferior to MRI to predict hamstring tendon graft diameter for ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between intraoperative hamstring tendon graft diameter and its preoperative measurement using different sonographic scanning protocol from previous studies.
METHODS: Two cadaveric knees were utilized for validation. Sonographically guided gracilis tendon (G) and semitendinosus tendon (ST) injections were performed at myotendinous junction of sartorius using colored latex and then dissection was performed. In the clinical studies, 28 patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction were enrolled. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of G and ST were measured at myotendinous junction of Sartorius. The diameter of doubled G (2G), doubled ST (2ST) and quadrupled ST + G (4STG) were intraoperatively measured using graft sizing devices with 0.5-mm increments.
RESULTS: Cadaveric dissection showed the presence of latex on the surface of G and ST at myotendinous junction of Sartorius in all specimens. In the clinical studies, CSA of G, ST, and ST + G significantly correlated with diameter of 2G (r = 0.464, p = 0.039), 2ST (r = 0.712, p < 0.001), and 4STG (r = 0.792, p < 0.001), respectively. As a result of the simple linear regression analysis, 4STG diameter could be predicted by the following formula: 4.345 + 0.210 × CSA. The differences between calculated diameter by this formula and intraoperative 4STG diameter were within ± 0.5 mm in 89.3% (25/28) of subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: The diameter of 2ST and 4STG can be reliably predicted based on sonographic CSA measurement preoperatively. Sonography is a cost-effective alternate to repeat MRI to predict hamstring graft diameter preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study; Level II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Gracilis tendon; Hamstring tendon graft; Preoperative planning; Semitendinosus tendon; Sonography; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30167751     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5101-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

1.  ACL hamstring grafts fixed using adjustable cortical suspension in both the femur and tibia demonstrate healing and integration on MRI at one year.

Authors:  Sven Putnis; Thomas Neri; Samuel Grasso; James Linklater; Brett Fritsch; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Ryo Kanto; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tsung-Min Lee; Wei-Ting Wu; Yi-Hsiang Chiu; Ke-Vin Chang; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Predicting autologous hamstring graft diameter and finding reliable measurement levels in the Zhuang population using preoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Huang; Hong-Yu Zheng; Ze-Feng Shi; Hui-Hui Yang; Bing Zhang; Xiao-Chun Yang; Hong Wang; Ru-Xin Tan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.755

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.