| Literature DB >> 30157878 |
Di Liu1, Xi Chu2, Hao Wang1,3, Jing Dong2, Si-Qi Ge1,3, Zhong-Yao Zhao1, Hong-Li Peng1, Ming Sun1, Li-Juan Wu1, Man-Shu Song1, Xiu-Hua Guo1, Qun Meng1, You-Xin Wang4,5, Gordan Lauc6,7, Wei Wang1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alternative N-glycosylation has significant structural and functional consequences on immunoglobulin G (IgG) and can affect immune responses, acting as a switch between pro- and anti-inflammatory IgG functionality. Studies have demonstrated that IgG N-glycosylation is associated with ageing, body mass index, type 2 diabetes and hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: Blood lipids; Dyslipidaemia; Immunoglobulin G; N-Glycosylation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30157878 PMCID: PMC6114873 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1616-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Demographic and biochemical characteristics of the participants
| Parameters | Total (n = 598) | Dyslipidaemia (n = 150) | Controls (n = 448) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of male (%) | 198 (33.11%) | 76 (50.67%) | 122 (27.23%) | < 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 47.35 ± 6.59 | 48.89 ± 7.02 | 46.84 ± 6.36 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.59 ± 3.23 | 25.43 ± 3.65 | 24.28 ± 3.04 | < 0.001 |
| WHR | 0.82 ± 0.07 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.81 ± 0.07 | < 0.001 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.35 ± 0.83 | 5.58 ± 0.99 | 5.29 ± 0.77 | < 0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 117.69 ± 14.05 | 119.50 ± 13.84 | 117.26 ± 15.06 | 0.108 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.78 ± 10.46 | 82.06 ± 10.87 | 77.93 ± 10.20 | < 0.001 |
| RHR (beats/min) | 76.09 ± 9.59 | 76.29 ± 8.91 | 76.13 ± 9.73 | 0.859 |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist–hip ratio, FBG fasting blood triglycerides, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, RHR resting heart rate
* Statistically significant at significant level of 0.05
Associations between IgG glycan and blood lipids
| IgG glycans | Prin. 3 | Prin. 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI)a |
| β (95% CI)b |
| |
| Initial measurements | ||||
| GP2 | 0.046 (0.006 to 0.087) | 0.023* | − 0.012 (− 0.055 to 0.032) | 0.596 |
| GP4 | 0.035 (0.014 to 0.056) | 0.001* | − 0.015 (− 0.039 to 0.010) | 0.237 |
| GP5 | 0.035 (0.014 to 0.055) | 0.001* | 0.019 (− 0.006 to 0.044) | 0.130 |
| GP6 | 0.036 (0.015 to 0.057) | < 0.001** | − 0.010 (− 0.034 to 0.014) | 0.395 |
| GP11 | 0.020 (0.004 to 0.036) | 0.013* | 0.017 (− 0.001 to 0.035) | 0.066 |
| GP14 | − 0.022 (− 0.037 to 0.006) | 0.006* | 0.004 (− 0.014 to 0.022) | 0.642 |
| GP18 | − 0.033 (− 0.051 to 0.015) | < 0.001** | 0.006 (− 0.015 to 0.026) | 0.604 |
| GP20 | 0.014 (− 0.015 to 0.042) | 0.336 | 0.051 (0.018 to 0.084) | 0.003* |
| GP21 | 0.024 (0.004 to 0.045) | 0.020* | 0.025 (0.001 to 0.049) | 0.041* |
| Sialylation | ||||
| FGS/(FG + FGS) | − 0.014 (− 0.025 to 0.003) | 0.013* | 0.001 (− 0.011 to 0.014) | 0.840 |
| FGS/(F + FG + FGS) | − 0.023 (− 0.037 to 0.008) | 0.003* | 0.006 (− 0.012 to 0.023) | 0.527 |
| Bisecting GlcNAc | ||||
| FBStotal/FStotal | 0.021 (0.002 to 0.041) | 0.032* | − 0.008 (− 0.030 to 0.014) | 0.498 |
| FBS2/FS2 | 0.020 (0.001 to 0.038) | 0.039* | 0.005 (− 0.016 to 0.023) | 0.660 |
| FBS2/(FS2 + FBS2) | 0.011 (0.001 to 0.020) | 0.034* | 0.002 (− 0.009 to 0.013) | 0.740 |
| Galactosylation | ||||
| G0n | 0.029 (0.012 to 0.046) | 0.001* | –0.013 (− 0.033 to 0.007) | 0.212 |
| G2n | − 0.026 (− 0.043 to 0.009) | 0.003* | 0.008 (− 0.013 to 0.027) | 0.476 |
Prin.1 = 0.773 × SBP + 0.783 × DBP + 0.575 × FBG + 0.106 × RHR + 0.352 × Age + 0.688 × BMI + 0.733 × WHR
Prin.2 = 0.361 × SBP + 0.364 × DBP − 0.176 × FBG + 0.739 × RHR − 0.370 × Age − 0.246 × BMI − 0.329 × WHR
Prin.3 = 0.985 × TC + 0.134 × TG + 0.444 × HDL + 0.923 × LDL
Prin.4 = 0.133 × TC + 0.889 × TG-0.755 × HDL + 0.092 × LDL
BMI body mass index, WHR waist–hip ratio, FBG fasting blood glucose, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, TC total cholesterol, TG total triglycerides, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, RHR resting heart rate
aAdjusted for the effects of sex, Prin.1, Prin.2 and Prin.4
bAdjusted for the effects of sex, Prin.1, Prin.2 and Prin.3
* Statistically significant associations between two variables are shown, P < 0.05
** Statistically significant associations between two variables are shown, P < 0.05/57 = 0.0009
Fig. 1Canonical structures of the normalized IgG N-glycan and blood lipids in the first canonical set. The absolute value of canonical loadings greater than 0.30 was significant loadings. All of the variables are sorted by the absolute value of their canonical loadings. The positive relationships are represented in black boxes, while negative relationships are showed in red boxes. TC total cholesterol, TG total triglycerides, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein
Fig. 2Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the associations of the normalized glycan variables in dyslipidaemia vs controls (adjusted for sex, Prin.1 and Prin.2)
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in regard to binary logistic regression in the prediction of dyslipidaemia. AUC area under the cure; GP4, GP6, GP14, GP18, GP20 and GP21 included in the final model