Anja S Hoefle1, Adina M Bangert1, Adelmar Stamfort1, Kurt Gedrich1, Manuela J Rist1, Yu-Mi Lee2, Thomas Skurk3, Hannelore Daniel4. 1. Department of Nutritional Physiology. 2. Department of Clinical Nutritional Medicine, Central Institute for Nutrition and Food Sciences, and. 3. Department of Clinical Nutritional Medicine, Central Institute for Nutrition and Food Sciences, and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 4. Department of Nutritional Physiology hannelore.daniel@tum.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Casein is considered a slowly digestible protein compared with whey protein, and this may cause differences in hormone responses and the kinetics of delivering amino acids into the circulation. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether postprandial plasma hormone and metabolite responses were different when bovine casein or whey protein was co-administered with carbohydrates in healthy and prediabetic adults. METHODS:White healthy male adults (n = 15) and white, well-defined male and female prediabetic adults (n = 15) receivedtest drinks randomly on 3 different occasions at least 2 d apart which contained 50 g of maltodextrin19 (MD19) alone or in combination with 50 g of whey protein isolate (WPI) or 50 g of sodium caseinate (SC). Blood samples were collected over a 240-min time period and were analyzed for hormone profiles and defined metabolites. RESULTS: No evidence was found that gastric emptying was different between the 2 protein drinks. Both proteins increased peak plasma insulin concentrations in prediabetic persons by 96% compared with MD19 (each, P < 0.05), which was accompanied by a reduction of peak venous blood glucose by 21% (each, P < 0.0001) without a difference between the 2 proteins. Peak plasma glucagon concentrations increased by 101% in both groups after the protein drinks (P < 0.05). The WPI drink also increased peak plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations in healthy volunteers by 56% (P < 0.01). Differences in plasma metabolite concentrations in volunteers could be attributed exclusively to the differences in the amino acid composition of the 2 proteins ingested. CONCLUSION: The WPI and the SC drinks similarly reduced postprandial glucose excursions when ingested with carbohydrates in healthy and prediabetic volunteers. Under our experimental conditions, however, no evidence was found that gastrointestinal processing of the 2 protein varieties differed substantially. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as DRKS00005682.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Casein is considered a slowly digestible protein compared with whey protein, and this may cause differences in hormone responses and the kinetics of delivering amino acids into the circulation. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether postprandial plasma hormone and metabolite responses were different when bovine casein or whey protein was co-administered with carbohydrates in healthy and prediabetic adults. METHODS: White healthy male adults (n = 15) and white, well-defined male and female prediabetic adults (n = 15) received test drinks randomly on 3 different occasions at least 2 d apart which contained 50 g of maltodextrin19 (MD19) alone or in combination with 50 g of whey protein isolate (WPI) or 50 g of sodium caseinate (SC). Blood samples were collected over a 240-min time period and were analyzed for hormone profiles and defined metabolites. RESULTS: No evidence was found that gastric emptying was different between the 2 protein drinks. Both proteins increased peak plasma insulin concentrations in prediabetic persons by 96% compared with MD19 (each, P < 0.05), which was accompanied by a reduction of peak venous blood glucose by 21% (each, P < 0.0001) without a difference between the 2 proteins. Peak plasma glucagon concentrations increased by 101% in both groups after the protein drinks (P < 0.05). The WPI drink also increased peak plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations in healthy volunteers by 56% (P < 0.01). Differences in plasma metabolite concentrations in volunteers could be attributed exclusively to the differences in the amino acid composition of the 2 proteins ingested. CONCLUSION: The WPI and the SC drinks similarly reduced postprandial glucose excursions when ingested with carbohydrates in healthy and prediabetic volunteers. Under our experimental conditions, however, no evidence was found that gastrointestinal processing of the 2 protein varieties differed substantially. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as DRKS00005682.
Authors: Kristin M Hirahatake; Richard S Bruno; Bradley W Bolling; Christopher Blesso; Lacy M Alexander; Sean H Adams Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Dean M Allerton; Matthew D Campbell; Javier T Gonzalez; Penny L S Rumbold; Daniel J West; Emma J Stevenson Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Linda H Münger; Mar Garcia-Aloy; Rosa Vázquez-Fresno; Doreen Gille; Albert Remus R Rosana; Anna Passerini; María-Trinidad Soria-Florido; Grégory Pimentel; Tanvir Sajed; David S Wishart; Cristina Andres Lacueva; Guy Vergères; Giulia Praticò Journal: Genes Nutr Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 5.523
Authors: Erin L Wood; David G Christian; Mohammed Arafat; Laura K McColl; Colin G Prosser; Elizabeth A Carpenter; Allen S Levine; Anica Klockars; Pawel K Olszewski Journal: Foods Date: 2021-03-19