The Association Between Normal BMI With Central Adiposity And Proinflammatory Potential Immunoglobulin G N-Glycosylation.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism by which normal body mass index (BMI) with central adiposity (NWCA) increases the risk of the diseases has not been completely elucidated. The inflammatory role of immunoglobulin G (IgG) N-glycosylation in obesity defined by BMI or central adiposity defined by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was reported, respectively. We undertook this three-center cross-sectional study to determine the association between the IgG N-glycans and NWCA.
METHODS: The participants were categorized into four different phenotypes: normal BMI with normal WHR (NW), normal BMI with central adiposity (NWCA), obesity with normal WHR (ONCA) and obesity with central adiposity (OCA). The IgG N-glycans were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography analysis of released glycans, and differences among groups were compared.
RESULTS: In total, 17 out of 24 initial IgG N-glycans were significantly different among the four groups (NW, ONCA, NWCA and OCA) (P<0.05/6*78=0.0001). The changes of IgG glycans in central obesity (12 GPs) were more than those in obesity (3 GPs). In addition, lower galactosylation and bisecting GlcNAc and higher fucosylation were associated with increased risk of NWCA.
CONCLUSION: Central obesity was involved in more changes of IgG N-glycosylation representing stronger inflammation than obesity, which might make a greater contribution to the risk of related disorders. NWCA was associated with an increased pro-inflammatory of IgG N-glycosylation, which was accompanied by the development of central obesity and other related disorders.

Introduction

Obesity, especially central adiposity, is a growing public health problem.1,2 Obesity defined by body mass index (BMI) or central adiposity such as measuring by waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is one of the most important risk factors of the majority of chronic non-communicable diseases, including metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and cancers.3,4 In addition, a multicohort study has shown that overweight participants lost 1 disease-free year, the mild obesity 3 to 4 years and the severe obesity 7 to 8 years compared with normal BMI participants.5

However, the BMI does not consider body fat distribution, which is an important limitation since there are suggestions that the metabolic complications of central adiposity are more closely related to visceral adiposity than overall adiposity.6 WHR is a good parameter of abdominal fat accumulation, reflecting central adiposity more than BMI.7–9 The increasing evidences show that central adiposity makes a greater contribution to the risk of suffering insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases than general obesity.8–11 In addition, a recent study showed that normal BMI with central adiposity (NWCA), which is defined as normal BMI but abdominal fat accumulation, is also associated with increased mortality risk of total and cardiovascular disease.8 However, the mechanism by which NWCA increases the risk of these diseases has not been completely elucidated.

N-glycosylation, as the most common and essential post-translational modification of human proteins, is closer to biological function.12 N-glycosylation significantly affects protein structure and function, and thus participates in multiple physiology and pathologic process.12 Changes in immunoglobulin G (IgG) N-glycosylation patterns have been associated with the incidence and development of aging, chronic non-communicable diseases and inflammatory diseases.13,14 IgG plays an important role in the human immune system, and N-glycans attach to the conserved asparagine 297 in the fragment crystallizable (Fc) part of this molecule and act as a switch between pro- and anti-inflammatory IgG functionality, and even slight aberrant IgG N-glycosylation can promote inflammation.15

Obesity and central adiposity are characterized by a pro-inflammatory state and elevated levels of inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6, that have been associated with risk of developing obesity and central obesity.16,17 The inflammatory role of IgG N-glycosylation in obesity defined by BMI and central adiposity defined by WHR were, respectively, reported in European and Australian populations.18,19 However, IgG N-glycosylation patterns in NWCA remain unknown. We hypothesized that the changes in IgG N-glycan profiles are involved in the pathogenesis of NWCA by regulating the inflammatory response. In the present study, we aimed to determine the association between the IgG N-glycans and NWCA in the multi-center cross-sectional study, and to further investigate the potential role of IgG N-glycosylation in NWCA.

Materials And Methods

Ethical Approval

Written informed consent was obtained from each subject at the beginning of the study, and the study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. The ethics approval was given in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Participants

All participants were recruited from our three cohort studies, including Xicheng community-based cohort in the Xuanwu hospital (from September 2009 to September 2012 of the baseline population), China suboptimal health cohort study in the Jidong Oil-field hospital (from September 2013 to September 2014 of the baseline population) and Beijing health management cohort in the Beijing Xiaotangshan hospital (from August 2014 to October 2015 of the follow-up population).20–22 The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study population were as follows: inclusion criteria: (1) signed informed consent prior to participation, (2) age equal to or greater than 18 years and (3) no medication history during the previous 2 weeks; exclusion criteria: (1) underweight participants, (2) pregnant or lactating women, (3) history of mental illness or infectious disease and (4) history of stroke or other cerebrovascular diseases, congenital heart disease, liver disease, renal failure, malignant tumor, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis or other diseases. Of note, the participants in the previous study who were recruited from the Tiantan Hospital were eliminated because they were diagnosed with ischemic stroke.22 The flowchart for the process of including study population is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1

The flow chart of study populations.

Diagnosis Of Obesity And Central Adiposity

The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by the formula weight (in kilograms)/height2 (in meters squared), which was categorized as normal weight (BMI of 18.50 to 23.99 kg/m2), overweight (BMI of 24.00 to 27.99 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI≥28.00 kg/m2).23 Underweight participants (BMI<18.50 kg/m2) were excluded to avoid reverse causation. The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated as waist circumference (in centimeter)/height (in centimeter). Central adiposity was defined using WHR of 0.85 or higher in women and 0.90 or higher in men.24 The participants were divided into four different obesity and central adiposity groups for normal BMI with normal WHR (NW), normal BMI with central adiposity (NWCA), obesity with normal WHR (ONCA) and obesity with central adiposity (OCA).

Covariates

Each participant was required to complete a thorough health examination, which included anthropometric measurements and an analysis of the physical and chemical properties of a blood sample. Blood samples were collected from participants in the morning and plasma samples were separated in the hospital laboratory after centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 mins. Detailed information about demographic characteristics and blood sample collection were previously described.20,22

The participants were then classified into the hypertension group [mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg] or the normal blood pressure group (mean SBP <120 mmHg and mean DBP <80 mmHg).25 Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was made by physicians according to the 1999 WHO Criteria [Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) greater than or equal to 7.0 mmol/L].26 According to the guideline for the prevention and control of dyslipidemia of adults in China, the participants were grouped into dyslipidemia with total cholesterol (TC) ≥6.2 mmol/L, or triglycerides (TG) ≥2.3 mmol/L, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) <1.0 mmol/L, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) ≥4.1 mmol/L.20

IgG N-Glycans Analysis

IgG N-glycans were detected by the method of hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC)-ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), which was reported in the previous study.27 In brief, IgG was isolated using protein G monolithic plates, and then IgG N-glycans were released, labelled and purified, and finally IgG N-glycans were analyzed by 24 initial glycan peaks (GPs). An additional 54 derived traits were calculated by the remaining 24 directly measured glycans, which were described in the published papers.27

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables underlying normal distribution were represented as the mean± standard deviation (SD); otherwise, medians (P25- P75) were used. The differences of continuous variables among the groups were tested by one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis tests. Categorical variables were represented as n (proportion), and the differences among the groups were tested by chi-square tests. The association between the two variables was performed using Pearson or Spearmen’s rank correlation. The description of IgG glycans was based on non-parametric methods because deviations from normal distribution were observed. The Holm method was applied to correct the multiple comparisons.

Analyses of associations between disease status and glycan traits were performed using a logistic regression model with age, sex, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia included as additional covariates. Prior to correlation and regression analysis, the z-score of normalized transformations for IgG N-glycans was applied to add the consistent comparability among IgG N-glycans.

To explore the association of FPG, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, HDLC and LDLC on IgG N-glycans in the NWCA group, canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was performed, which determined the linear combination of variables derived from two sets of the glycan structures (x) and the indicators including FBG, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, HDLC and LDLC (y). The identified variables with statistically significant impact on the canonical variables were judged by the canonical loadings. Generally, the absolute values greater than 0.30 are used to define significant loadings.

Clustering analysis was performed on the difference between IgG N-glycans in participants with NWCA to identify the subgroups with the similarity in patterns of glycan changes with the “clustergram” function (Matlab, Mathworks USA) with “average linkage” option and “correlation” distance both for rows (corresponding to each glycans) and columns (average levels of glycans for each group) defined as one Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

In addition, we combined the present study and the European and West Australian study to explore the association of IgG N-glycans with BMI and WHR; the result was to be expressed as correlation coefficient with 95% CI and was analyzed using by the R package “metacor”.

Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 24.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), R 3.2.4 and SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Chicago, IL, USA). All reported P values were two-sided, and P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Participant Characteristics

Finally, 1196 participants who had a complete dataset of blood measurements and IgG N-glycan traits were included in the further analysis. The basic characteristics of all participants in four different obesity and central adiposity groups (Table 1) were described. The detailed information of the three studies is shown in the supplemental content (). In total, 9 clinical traits were significantly different among the four groups (P<0.05/6). Of note, the median (P25–P75) of age in the NWCA subjects was 55 (49–63) years, which was higher than that in the other three groups. The proportion of males (77.75%) in the NWCA group was higher than females (22.25%). The prevalence of hypertension in the ONCA group was higher than it in the NWCA group, whereas higher prevalence of diabetes was found in the NWCA group (P<0.017). As shown in , more than half of 1196 participants were classified as having obesity and central adiposity. The prevalence of NWCA was 36% with 95% CI (33–38%).

Table 1

Characteristics Of Participants In Different Four Different Obesity And Central Adiposity Groups

Variables	NW (n=545)	ONCA (n=48)	NWCA (n=427)	OCA (n=176)	P
Age	48 (43–53)	48.5 (44.5–54.5)	55 (49–63)	53 (47–60)	<0.0001
BMI	23.55 (21.93–25.22)	28.96 (28.36–30.01)	25.53 (24.04–26.64)	29.84 (28.74–31.87)	<0.0001
SBP	120 (110–126)	120 (115–135)	125 (117–138)	130 (120–142)	<0.0001
DBP	77 (70–80)	80 (70–85)	74 (67–81)	80 (70–87)	0.0007
FPG	5.16 (4.86–5.64)	5.54 (5.11–6.53)	6.42 (5.37–8.25)	6.94 (5.66–8.18)	<0.0001
TC	4.87 (4.25–5.48)	4.75 (4.46–5.39)	4.58 (3.92–5.27)	4.65 (4.05–5.49)	0.0001
TG	1.02 (0.76–1.51)	1.57 (1.14–2.4)	1.34 (0.97–2.03)	1.59 (1.11–2.36)	<0.0001
LDLC	2.68 (2.24–3.11)	2.70 (2.40–3.13)	2.68 (2.19–3.28)	2.85(2.33–3.52)	0.0501
WHR	0.81 (0.77–0.85)	0.84 (0.81–0.87)	0.93 (0.91–0.96)	0.95(0.92–0.99)	<0.0001
HDLC	1.59 (1.35–1.82)	1.41 (1.19–1.62)	1.26 (1.06–1.5)	1.17 (1.03–1.41)	<0.0001
Male, n (%)	220 (40.37)	18 (37.50)	332 (77.75)	138 (78.41)	<0.0001
Hypertension, n (%)	81 (14.86)	17 (35.42)	114 (26.70)	70 (39.77)	<0.0001
Diabetes, n (%)	39 (7.16)	9 (18.75)	175 (40.98)	83 (47.16)	<0.0001
Dyslipidemia, n (%)	103 (18.90)	18 (37.50)	152 (35.6)	82 (46.59)	<0.0001

Notes: Data are shown as median (P25-P75) and n (proportion). P<0.05 indicated significance.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; FPG, fasting plasma glucose. NW, normal BMI with normal WHR; ONCA, obesity with normal WHR; NWCA, normal BMI with central adiposity; OCO, obesity with central adiposity.

Associations Of IgG N-Glycans With NWCA, ONCA And OCA

We performed the associations of IgG N-glycans with obesity and central adiposity patients taking into consideration adjusting for the effects of gender, age, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. The association of significant normalized IgG N-glycans with central adiposity was not exactly the same as those with obesity (Figure 2). Twelve normalized IgG N-glycans (GP4, GP5, GP7, GP10, GP11, GP13, GP15, GP16, GP17, GP23 and GP24) linking to central adiposity, which was more than three normalized IgG N-glycans (GP1, GP7 and GP13) connected with obesity, delineated the most remarkable effect of glycans in the progression of central adiposity.

Figure 2

The profile of statistically significant correlations of IgG N-glycans with central adiposity (A) and obesity (B) after adjusting for the effects of gender, age, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia.

Statistically significant differences in IgG N-glycans among four groups were observed after correction for multiple comparisons (Figure 3). In total, 17 out of 24 initial IgG N-glycans were significantly different among the four groups (NW, ONCA, NWCA and OCA) (P<0.05/6*78=0.0001). Compared to NW population, 13 and 7 normalized IgG N-glycans found significant associations with NWCA and OCA after adjusting for the effects of gender, age, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia (), while no significant association was found in ONCA. Compared to NW and ONCA, IgG N-glycans in OCA population were always changing in company with those in NWCA population implying that the progression of central adiposity might be taken part in IgG glycosylation, which inspired us to further explore the connections between glycans and central adiposity.

Figure 3

Differences of IgG N-glycans among NW, ONCA, NWCA and OCA in the whole populations. Data are shown as box and whiskers plots. Median was represented by lines inside the boxes represented by the 25th to 75th percentiles. The whiskers appearing denoted the lowest and highest values. (P<0.05/6*78=0.0001 indicated significant after multiple comparisons).

The profile of statistically significant correlations of IgG N-glycans and NWCA and OCA was not absolutely consistent, but GP5, GP7, GP10, GP11, GP13, GP15 GP23 were found to be statistically significantly associated with NWCA and OCA (Figure 4). Derived traits were calculated representing common biologically meaningful features (sialylation, galactosylation glycan branching and fucosylation). In parallel, 33 derived traits representing sialylation, galactosylation glycan branching and fucosylation were found to be statistically significantly associated with NWCA and OCA. The changes of IgG N-glycans and glycosylation in the NWCA group were more than those in the ONCA group. The detailed information is described in the supplemental content ( and ).

Figure 4

The profile of statistically significant correlations of IgG N-glycans with NWCA (A) and OCA (B) after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia.

In the gross, changes in glycan expression correlated with NWCA activity cannot be too worthy to investigate. GP4, GP19, GP23 and GP24 were positively associated NWCA, whereas GP5, GP7, GP10, GP11, GP13, GP15, GP17, GP18 and GP20 had negative relations with NWCA after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. For the derived glycans, IgG glycans showed lower level of galactosylation (G1n and G2n) and higher level of agalactosylation (G0n) for NWCA patients compared to the controls. While, the level of bisecting N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) (FBStotal/FStotal, FBS1/FS1, FBS1/(FS1+ FBS1), FBS2/FS2 and FBS2/(FS2+ FBS2)) and fucosylation (Fntotal and Fn) in the NWCA patients was significantly higher than those in the control group. In addition, the high level of FBGS/(FBG+FBGS), FBGS/(FB+FBG+FBGS), FG2S2/(FG2+FG2S1+FG2S2), FBG2S1/(FBG2+FBG2S1+FBG2S2) and FBG2S2/(FBG2+FBG2S1+FBG2S2) increased the risk of NWCA, while the low level of FtotalS1/FtotalS2 and FS1/FS2 increased the risk of NWCA.

The IgG N-Glycans Patterns In The NWCA Populations

In NWCA populations, seven pairs of canonical variables in CCA were shown, with canonical correlations of 0.6690 (F= 2.56, P< 0.001), 0.3728 (F= 1.23, P=0.0418), 0.2877 (F= 0.97, P= 0.5714), 0.2654 (F= 0.85, P= 0.8370), 0.2349 (F= 0.68, P= 0.9684), 0.1489 (F= 0.47, P=0.9974) and 0.1465 (F= 0.49, P= 0.9621) for each successive pair by the CCA. The first and the second canonical groups were statistically significant, which demonstrated that IgG glycan traits were significantly linked to the clinical variables. As shown in Figure 5, 10 initial IgG glycan traits (GP4, GP5, GP7, GP8, GP13, GP15 and GP20) had the tendency to be significantly related to FPG, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, LDLC and HDLC levels in the first canonical group.

Figure 5

Canonical structures of the normalized IgG N‑glycan patterns and FPG, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, HDLC and LDLC in the first canonical set in the NWCA population. The absolute value of canonical loadings greater than 0.30 was significant loadings. All of the variables are sorted by the absolute value of their canonical loadings. The positive relationships are represented in black boxes, while negative relationships are shown in red boxes.

In addition, aiming to identify individuals with similar patterns of changes, we have applied a bi-clustering algorithm, which at the same time clusters changes in individual glycans and group participants of NWCA according to the similarity in patterns of glycan changes. As shown in Figure 6, 2 subgroups including NWCA without any of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia and NWCA with more than one of three disease outcomes were identified using different IgG glycosylation patterns.

Figure 6

Clustering analysis on the difference between normalized IgG N-glycan patterns in the NWCA population. (A) Represented the changes in glycosylation among four participant groups with all three diseases (hypertension and diabetes and dyslipidemia), two of these diseases, one of these diseases and none, respectively. (B) Represented the changes in glycosylation among eight participant groups with all three diseases (hypertension and diabetes and dyslipidemia), two of these diseases (hypertension and diabetes, diabetes and dyslipidemia and hypertension and dyslipidemia), one of these diseases (hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia) and none, respectively.

Discussion

The prevalence of the obesity and central adiposity are rising worldwide. Our finding showed that 18.7% of subjects were affected by obesity, 50.4% were affected by central adiposity, more than half of the included participants were classified as having obesity or central adiposity. In addition, the prevalence rates of NWCA were 36.0%. According to the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the US,8,28 34.6% of subjects were overweight, 25.1% were affected by obesity, 70.2% were affected by central adiposity and the prevalence rates of NWCA were 11.7%. The cross-sectional studies showed that the prevalence rates of NWCA were 36.9% and 15.4% in South Africa and Thai, respectively.9,29 It may be due to the different definition of obesity and central adiposity that the reported prevalence rate of NWCA is very different. However, NWCA is gradually developing as a major health problem worldwide, and identification of the underlying mechanism might translate new knowledge into the prevention and treatment of central adiposity.

Combining the present study and previous studies,18,19 we found that BMI and WHR were positively associated with GP4, GP6, and negatively associated with GP7, GP12-15, GP17-18 and GP20 (Table 2). In our present study, high level of GP23 and low level of GP5, GP7, GP10, GP11, GP13 and GP15 increased the risk of NWCA and OCA. In addition, lower galactosylation and bisecting GlcNAc and higher fucosylation increased the risk of NWCA. Consistent with previous studies,13,22,30 the changes of lower galactosylation and bisecting GlcNAc and higher fucosylation are involved in an imbalance of the inflammatory response that increases the risk of diseases. In addition, considering that accumulating evidence indicates the changes in IgG glycosylation mechanism could be a part of the molecular mechanism leading to the promotion of inflammation,13,30 the changes of IgG N-glycans and N-glycosylation in obesity and central adiposity may be one of the molecular mechanisms of inflammation in NWCA.

Table 2

IgG N-Glycans Associated With BMI And WHR

GPs	BMI		WHR
r (95% CI)#	P	r (95% CI) &	P
GP1	−0.042 (−0.016–0.067)	0.0008	0.059 (0.011–0.103)	0.007
GP2	−0.009 (−0.035–0.017)	0.239	0.066 (0.021–0.112)	0.002
GP3	/	/	0.010 (−0.0036–0.056)	0.332
GP4	0.090(0.064–0.116)	<0.001	0.148 (0.103–0.193)	<0.001
GP5	−0.019 (−0.045–0.007)	0.073	−0.176 (−0.132–0.220)	<0.001
GP6	0.049 (0.023–0.075)	0.0001	0.092 (0.046–0.137)	<0.001
GP7	−0.068 (−0.043–0.094)	<0.001	−0.160 (−0.115–0.205)	<0.001
GP8	0.013 (−0.027–0.025)	0.462	−0.084 (−0.039–0.129)	<0.001
GP9	0.057 (0.031–0.083)	<0.001	0.037 (−0.009–0.082)	0.058
GP10	0.009 (−0.017–0.035)	0.243	−0.086 (−0.040–0.131)	0.0001
GP11	0.053 (0.027–0.079)	<0.001	−0.028 (−0.073–0.018)	0.119
GP12	−0.087 (−0.061–0.113)	<0.001	−0.091 (−0.046–0.137)	<0.001
GP13	−0.079 (−0.053–0.105)	<0.001	−0.194 (0.150–0.238)	<0.001
GP14	−0.100 (−0.074–0.126)	<0.001	−0.105 (−0.060–0.150)	<0.001
GP15	−0.081 (−0.055–0.107)	<0.001	−0.155 (−0.110–0.199)	<0.001
GP16	0.033 (0.007–0.059)	0.006	0.008 (−0.038–0.023)	0.363
GP17	−0.077 (−0.051–0.103)	<0.001	−0.097 (−0.052–0.143)	<0.001
GP18	−0.080 (−0.054–0.106)	<0.001	−0.089 (−0.043–0.134)	<0.001
GP19	−0.017 (−0.043–0.008)	0.094	0.004 (−0.042–0.050)	0.427
GP20	−0.055 (−0.028–0.081)	<0.001	−0.182 (−0.138–0.227)	<0.001
GP21	0.004 (−0.022–0.030)	0.389	−0.005 (−0.051–0.041)	0.412
GP22	−0.042 (−0.016–0.068)	0.0008	0.039 (−0.006–0.085)	0.046
GP23	−0.012 (−0.038–0.014)	0.173	0.056 (0.011–0.102)	0.008
GP24	−0.016 (−0.042–0.010)	0.113	0.058 (0.012–0.103)	0.007

Notes: #The result was combined with the data of 5689 individuals. &The result was combined with the data of 1833 individuals. /The association remains unclear.

Abbreviations: GP, glycan peak; BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.

The inflammatory role of IgG N-glycosylation in obesity and central adiposity could be associated with chronic inflammation as one of the characteristics of obesity and central adiposity. Central adiposity involves impairment of immune response affecting both innate and adaptive immunity, and adipose tissue can produce and secrete inflammatory molecules like tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK)-1.16,17 Alternative IgG N-glycosylation plays a crucial role in activation of complement by regulating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), thus acting as a switch between pro- and anti-inflammatory IgG functionality.14,15 Inflammatory disorders lead to several signaling transduction pathways activation, inflammatory cytokine chemokine production and cell migration, which in turn cause metabolic dysfunction.31,32 Although the causal relationship of central adiposity with inflammation and IgG N-glycosylation is unknown, the changes in IgG N-glycans observed in our study might also reflect the chronic inflammatory processes in obesity and central adiposity. Inflammation has emerged as one of the key factors regulating obesity and central adiposity triggering metabolic syndrome and other related disorders.33,34 There are shared genes that have been associated with both IgG glycosylation and obesity and central obesity (FUT8 and IL6ST), and an established association between complement activation and obesity and central obesity; it is suggested that pro-inflammatory IgG might be a contributor to the disease pathophysiology in this disease.35

Furthermore, the changes of IgG N-glycans and N-glycosylation in central adiposity were more than those in obesity, which performed the stronger immune response in central obesity. In addition, we found that that correlations of IgG N-glycans with WHR were stronger than those with BMI combining previous studies and the present study. Compared to NW and ONCA, IgG N-glycans in OCA population were always changing in company with those in NWCA population implying that the progression of central adiposity might take part in IgG N-glycosylation. The molecular mechanism of IgG N-glycosylation may explain that central adiposity makes a greater contribution to the risk of diseases than general obesity.8,9 The changes of IgG N-glycans and N-glycosylation in NWCA were more than those in OCA, indicating that IgG N-glycosylation performed more effect on NWCA. Therefore, we continued to explore the IgG N-glycans patterns in the NWCA populations. In NWCA populations, we found that IgG N-glycans were associated with the three disease outcomes including diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia, which would be related disorders reduced by NWCA. In addition, bi-clustering analysis participants of NWCA revealed the existence of two subgroups of patients with distinct patterns of IgG glycosylation changes, which suggested us that NWCA as a basic metabolic disorder with different IgG glycosylation patterns which presented different inflammatory reaction might reduce the different other related disease outcomes.

In our present study, there are several common limitations and insufficiencies. First, the differential glycosylation described above may provide exciting insights into pathogenesis of NWCA. However, causation is difficult to infer in the observational data and the observed changes may be a consequence rather than causes of the disease. The distribution of four different obesity and central adiposity groups in our multi-center cross-sectional study was uneven, which might lead to the evaluation bias. In addition, the study protocol should be registered previously to ensure its feasibility. Furthermore, we only use WHR to define central adiposity, which may induce evaluation bias. Although the inflammatory role of IgG N-glycosylation was performed in diseases, we should investigate other inflammatory biomarkers to corroborate the inflammatory status of obesity and central adiposity. Therefore, further cohort studies with more comprehensive study design are needed to provide a more definite explanation about the role of IgG glycosylation in the association between NWCA and its related disorders.

Conclusion

In summary, central adiposity was involved in more changes of IgG N-glycosylation, representing a stronger inflammation status than obesity, which might make a greater contribution to the risk of related disorders. NWCA was associated with an increased pro-inflammatory of IgG N-glycosylation, which was accompanied by the development of central adiposity and other related disorders.