| Literature DB >> 30154521 |
Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung1,2, Yuan Shi3, Yih Chung Tham3, Charumathi Sabanayagam3, Kumari Neelam4, Jie Jin Wang3,5, Paul Mitchell6, Ching-Yu Cheng3,5,7, Tien Yin Wong3,5,7, Carol Yim Lui Cheung3,5,8.
Abstract
We evaluated automated OCT-derived drusen volume measures in a population-based study (n = 4,512) aged ≥40 years, and its correlation with conventional color fundus photographs (CFP)-derived early AMD features. Participants had protocol-based assessment to capture medical and ocular history, genotyping for SNPs in CFH, ARMS2, and CETP, CFP-based AMD grading and automated drusen volume based on SD-OCT using built-in software (Cirrus OCT advanced RPE analysis software). Significantly fewer eyes with early AMD features (drusen, hyperpigmentation, soft or reticular drusen) had drusen volume = 0 mm3 (p < 0.001). In eyes with drusen volume > 0 mm3, increasing AMD severity was associated with increase in drusen volume (correlation coefficient 0.17, p < 0.001). However 220 (59.14%) of 372 participants with AMD based on CFP grading had drusen volume = 0 mm3. Factors associated with drusen volume included age (OR 1.42 per 5 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.76, 4.48), systolic blood pressure (OR1.00, 95% CI 1.00, 1.01), ethnic Malay (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.29, 1.83) and Chinese (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.37, 2.01) compared to Indian. The ARMS2 rs10490924 T allele was associated with increased drusen volume in subjects with AMD (multivariable adjusted OR1.54, 95% CI 1.08, 2.19). Automated OCT-derived drusen volume is correlated with CFP-based AMD grading in many, but not all subjects. However the agreement is not good. These two modalities provide complementary information and should be incorporated into future studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30154521 PMCID: PMC6113205 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31109-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of study participants.
| Mean/Number (SD/%) | |
|---|---|
| AGE, years | 59.1 (8.6) |
| GENDER, Female | 2307 (51.1%) |
| Ethnicity | |
| Chinese | 1294 (28.7%) |
| Malay | 1346 (29.8%) |
| Indian | 1872 (41.5%) |
| Body Mass Index, kg/m2 | 25.79 (4.66) |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.36 (1.18) |
| Blood HDL Cholesterol | 1.26 (0.34) |
| Blood LDL Cholesterol | 3.43 (0.98) |
| Blood suger level(SD) | 6.90 (3.22) |
| Creatinine, | 76.77 (42.42) |
| HbA1c, % | 6.25 (1.28) |
| Systolic Blood pressure, mmHg | 135.59 (18.52) |
| Diastolic Blood pressure, mmHg | 77.73 (9.86) |
| Smoking status | |
| Never smoked | 3151 (72.7%) |
| Current smoker | 656 (15.1%) |
| Past smoker | 525 (12.1%) |
| Drinking alcohol, yes | 384 (8.9%) |
| History of cardiovascular disease, yes | 393 (9.1%) |
| Use anti-cholesterol medication, yes | 1461 (34.4%) |
|
| |
| CC | 1247 (37.96%) |
| AC | 1552 (47.25%) |
| AA | 486 (14.79%) |
| GG | 1221 (37.45%) |
| GT | 1562 (47.91%) |
| TT | 479 (14.69%) |
| CC | 2109 (64.16%) |
| AC | 1027 (31.24%) |
| AA | 151 (4.60%) |
| TT | 3231 (98.33%) |
| GT | 54 (1.64%) |
| TT | 1 (0.03%) |
*Total number of subjects with genotype data available for each SNP studied.
OCT-derived Drusen volume and color fundus photograph-derived AMD category and individual AMD Features.
| Total N = 4512 | Number (%) of eyes with drusen volume = 0 mm3 | P-trend* of eyes with dichotamized drusen volume | Drusen Volume | P-trendϮ of eyes with DV > 0 mm3 | P-trendϮ (Overall) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In 717 participants with DV > 0 mm3) | ||||||||
| 25% Percentile | Median | 75% Percentile | ||||||
| AMD status | ||||||||
| No AMD | 4141 | 3576 (86.36%) |
| 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.024 |
|
|
| Early AMD | 347 | 216 (62.25%) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.019 | |||
| Late AMD | 24 | 3 (12.50%) | 0.004 | 0.121 | 0.459 | |||
| Any Drusen | ||||||||
| None | 3924 | 3388 (86.34%) |
| 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.02725 | 0.994 |
|
| Yes | 588 | 407 (69.22%) | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.018 | |||
| Hyperpigmentation | ||||||||
| None | 3948 | 3427 (86.80%) |
| 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.026 | 0.908 |
|
| Yes | 564 | 368 (65.25%) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.022 | |||
| Soft drusen | ||||||||
| None | 3147 | 2804 (89.10%) |
| 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.023 | 0.492 |
|
| Intermediate | 459 | 337 (73.42%) | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.018 | |||
| Soft distinct | 129 | 71 (55.04%) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.022 | |||
| Soft Indistinct | 631 | 502 (79.56%) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.026 | |||
| Reticular drusen | ||||||||
| None | 4439 | 3760 (84.70%) |
| 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.023 |
|
|
| Yes | 9 | 1 (11.11%) | 0.017 | 0.022 | 0.118 | |||
| Max Drusen size | ||||||||
| None | 927 | 791 (85.33%) |
| 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.028 | 0.909 |
|
| <63 µm | 2190 | 1993 (91.00%) | 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.021 | |||
| ≥63-<125 µm | 646 | 515 (79.72%) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.025 | |||
| ≥125-<250 µm | 542 | 392 (72.32%) | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.017 | |||
| ≥250 µm | 43 | 13 (30.23%) | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.071 | |||
| Drusen number | ||||||||
| None | 926 | 790 (85.31%) |
| 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.028 | 0.888 |
|
| <10 | 2411 | 2128 (88.26%) | 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.022 | |||
| ≥10 | 1010 | 785 (77.72%) | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.022 | |||
| Total drusen area | ||||||||
| <63 µm | 939 | 797 (84.88%) |
| 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.028 | 0.721 |
|
| 63–125 µm | 1876 | 1701 (90.67%) | 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.021 | |||
| 125–175 µm | 894 | 769 (86.02%) | 0.003 | 0.007 | 0.024 | |||
| 175–350 µm | 276 | 201 (72.83%) | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.018 | |||
| 350–650 µm | 241 | 171 (70.95%) | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.01 | |||
| <Half DA | 65 | 38 (58.46%) | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.019 | |||
| ≥Half and <1DA | 23 | 15 (65.22%) | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.019 | |||
| ≥1 DA | 41 | 15 (36.59%) | 0.005 | 0.018 | 0.073 | |||
Ptrend* of eyes with DV = 0 VS DV > 0 mm3: after dichotamizing drusen volumes at 0, test for increasing trend of drusen volume with increased exposure was conducted for binary response using Cochran-Armitage test.
Ptrend* of eyes with DV > 0 mm3 or total dataset: test for increasing trend of drusen volume with increased exposure was conducted for continuous response using Cuzik’s trend test.
P values < 0.05 are highlighted by bold font.
Factors influencing OCT-derived drusen volume.
| Univariable-model | Multivariable-model * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-val | OR (95% CI) | P-val | |
| Any AMD, yes | 4.05 (3.27 5.02) |
| 3.52 (2.76 4.48) |
|
| Age, every 5 years | 1.48 (1.42 1.54) |
| 1.42 (1.35 1.49) |
|
| Gender, reference to Male | 1.00 (0.88 1.15) | 0.954 | 1.14 (0.98 1.32) | 0.101 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 1.00 (0.98 1.01) | 0.558 | — | — |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/l | 0.89 (0.84 0.95) |
| — | — |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/l | 1.10 (0.9 1.34) | 0.352 | — | — |
| LDL cholesterol, mmol/l | 0.83 (0.77 0.9) |
| 0.97 (0.89 1.05) | 0.412 |
| Anti-hyperlipidaemia medication | 1.47 (1.28 1.7) |
| 1.01 (0.84 1.21) | 0.922 |
| Blood glucose, mmol/l | 1.02 (1.00 1.04) | 0.073 | — | — |
| Serum Creatinine, mmol/l | 1.00 (1.00 1.00) | 0.001 | 1 (1 1) | 0.979 |
| Glomerular Filtration Rate, | 0.98 (0.98 0.98) |
| 1.00 (0.99 1.00) | 0.546 |
| HbA1c, % | 1.05 (1.00 1.11) | 0.056 | — | — |
| Axial length, mm | 1.02 (0.94 1.1) | 0.641 | — | — |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 1.01 (1.01 1.02) |
| 1.00 (1.00 1.01) |
|
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 0.99 (0.99 1.00) | 0.046 | — | — |
| Alcohol consumption, yes | 0.84 (0.66 1.08) | 0.17 | — | — |
| History of cardiovascular disease, yes | 1.40 (1.14 1.74) |
| 0.94 (0.74 1.21) | 0.64 |
| Non-smoker | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Past smoker | 0.92 (0.76 1.11) | 0.385 | — | — |
| Current smoker | 1.14 (0.93 1.40) | 0.194 | — | — |
| Indian | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Malay | 1.49 (1.27 1.74) |
| 1.54 (1.29 1.83) |
|
| Chinese | 0.98 (0.82 1.16) | 0.794 | 1.66 (1.37 2.01) |
|
The analysis was done using logistic model for binary outcome of drusen volume based on: Drusen volume = 0 (n = 7372); Drusen volume > 0 (n = 1301).
*Multivariable models adjusted for age, gender, ethnicities, LDL, anti-cholesterol medication, history of cardio vascular disease, Glomerular Filtration Rate, blood pressure, and AMD.
P values < 0.05 are highlighted by bold font.
Genotype association with optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived drusen volume in participants with AMD (n = 347).
| Number (%) with Drusen volume = 0 | Number (%) with Drusen volume > 0 | Model 1* | Model 2* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 0.82 (0.58 1.16) | 0.251 | 0.78 (0.53 1.14) | 0.203 | ||
| CC | 71(54.62%) | 59(45.38%) | ||||
| AC | 104(61.9%) | 64(38.1%) | ||||
| AA | 29(59.18%) | 20(40.82%) | ||||
|
| 1.59 (1.14 2.24) |
| 1.54 (1.08 2.19) |
| ||
| GG | 83(68.6%) | 38(31.4%) | ||||
| GT | 96(58.18%) | 69(41.82%) | ||||
| TT | 25(40.98%) | 36(59.02%) | ||||
|
| 0.97 (0.66 1.42) | 0.864 | 0.97 (0.65 1.45) | 0.885 | ||
| CC | 130(59.09%) | 90(40.91%) | ||||
| AC | 62(56.36%) | 48(43.64%) | ||||
| AA | 12(70.59%) | 5(29.41%) | ||||
|
| NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| TT | 203(58.67%) | 143(41.33%) | ||||
| GT | 1(100%) | 0(0%) | ||||
| GG | 0 | 0 | ||||
AMD Age-related macular degeneration; DV drusen volume; OR Odds ratio; CI confidence intervals.
*Multivariable ordinal regression model adjusted for age, gender and principal components 1–3 from principal component analysis of genetic data.
Figure 1Examples of comparison between cross-sectional OCT through red dashed arrow, color fundus photographs (CFP) and OCT-derived drusen volume map. In (a), soft drusen can be seen on CFP and RPE elevation can be seen in corresponding cross-sectional OCT. This area was reflected as increased drusen volume (in turquoise) on the enface map. In (b), only hyperpigmentation can be seen on CFP. The corresponding cross-sectional OCT showed shallow and irregularly elevated RPE. A wider area of elevated drusen volume is highlighted in turquoise in the enface drusen volume map. In (c), cuticular (hard) drusen are seen on CFP, and very mild elevation of RPE is seen in a localized area. No significant elevation of drusen volume was reflect on the enface map.