OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to compare the efficacy of the new manganese-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent Mn-PyC3A to the commercial gadolinium-based agents Gd-DOTA and to Gd-EOB-DTPA to detect tumors in murine models of breast cancer and metastatic liver disease, respectively, and to quantify the fractional excretion and elimination of Mn-PyC3A in rats. METHODS: T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI with 0.1 mmol/kg Mn-PyC3A was compared with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DOTA in a breast cancer mouse model (n = 8) and to 0.025 mmol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA in a liver metastasis mouse model (n = 6). The fractional excretion, 1-day biodistribution, and 7-day biodistribution in rats after injection of 2.0 mmol/kg [Mn]Mn-PyC3A or Gd-DOTA were quantified by Mn gamma counting or Gd elemental analysis. Imaging data were compared with a paired t test; biodistribution data were compared with an unpaired t test. RESULTS: The postinjection-preinjection increases in tumor-to-muscle contrast-to-noise ratio (ΔCNR) 3 minutes after injection of Mn-PyC3A and Gd-DOTA (mean ± standard deviation) were 17 ± 3.8 and 20 ± 4.4, respectively (P = 0.34). Liver-to-tumor ΔCNR values at 8 minutes postinjection of Mn-PyC3A and Gd-EOB-DTPA were 28 ± 9.0 and 48 ± 23, respectively (P = 0.11). Mn-PyC3A is eliminated with 85% into the urine and 15% into the feces after administration to rats. The percentage of the injected doses (%ID) of Mn and Gd recovered in tissues after 1 day were 0.32 ± 0.12 and 0.57 ± 0.12, respectively (P = 0.0030), and after 7 days were 0.058 ± 0.051 and 0.19 ± 0.052, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Mn-PyC3A provides comparable tumor contrast enhancement to Gd-DOTA in a mouse breast cancer model and is more completely eliminated than Gd-DOTA; partial hepatobiliary elimination of Mn-PyC3A enables conspicuous delayed phase visualization of liver metastases.
OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to compare the efficacy of the new manganese-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent Mn-PyC3A to the commercial gadolinium-based agents Gd-DOTA and to Gd-EOB-DTPA to detect tumors in murine models of breast cancer and metastatic liver disease, respectively, and to quantify the fractional excretion and elimination of Mn-PyC3A in rats. METHODS: T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI with 0.1 mmol/kg Mn-PyC3A was compared with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DOTA in a breast cancermouse model (n = 8) and to 0.025 mmol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA in a liver metastasis mouse model (n = 6). The fractional excretion, 1-day biodistribution, and 7-day biodistribution in rats after injection of 2.0 mmol/kg [Mn]Mn-PyC3A or Gd-DOTA were quantified by Mn gamma counting or Gd elemental analysis. Imaging data were compared with a paired t test; biodistribution data were compared with an unpaired t test. RESULTS: The postinjection-preinjection increases in tumor-to-muscle contrast-to-noise ratio (ΔCNR) 3 minutes after injection of Mn-PyC3A and Gd-DOTA (mean ± standard deviation) were 17 ± 3.8 and 20 ± 4.4, respectively (P = 0.34). Liver-to-tumor ΔCNR values at 8 minutes postinjection of Mn-PyC3A and Gd-EOB-DTPA were 28 ± 9.0 and 48 ± 23, respectively (P = 0.11). Mn-PyC3A is eliminated with 85% into the urine and 15% into the feces after administration to rats. The percentage of the injected doses (%ID) of Mn and Gd recovered in tissues after 1 day were 0.32 ± 0.12 and 0.57 ± 0.12, respectively (P = 0.0030), and after 7 days were 0.058 ± 0.051 and 0.19 ± 0.052, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Mn-PyC3A provides comparable tumor contrast enhancement to Gd-DOTA in a mousebreast cancer model and is more completely eliminated than Gd-DOTA; partial hepatobiliary elimination of Mn-PyC3A enables conspicuous delayed phase visualization of liver metastases.
Authors: Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Mark E Jentoft; Michael A Paolini; David L Murray; David F Kallmes; Laurence J Eckel Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Yonglan Zheng; Hiroyuki Abe; Kristen Whitaker; Toshio F Yoshimatsu; Tom Walsh; David Schacht; Kirti Kulkarni; Deepa Sheth; Marion S Verp; Angela R Bradbury; Jane Churpek; Elias Obeid; Jeffrey Mueller; Galina Khramtsova; Fang Liu; Akila Raoul; Hongyuan Cao; Iris L Romero; Susan Hong; Robert Livingston; Nora Jaskowiak; Xiaoming Wang; Marcio Debiasi; Colin C Pritchard; Mary-Claire King; Gregory Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead; Dezheng Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eric M Gale; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Ian Ramsay; Yi-Fen Yen; David E Sosnovik; Peter Caravan Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stanley Yang; Meng Law; David Zagzag; Hope H Wu; Soonmee Cha; John G Golfinos; Edmond A Knopp; Glyn Johnson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sara Chirayil; Veronica Clavijo Jordan; André F Martins; Namini Paranawithana; S James Ratnakar; A Dean Sherry Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Iris Yuwen Zhou; Ian A Ramsay; Ilknur Ay; Pamela Pantazopoulos; Nicholas J Rotile; Alison Wong; Peter Caravan; Eric M Gale Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 10.065
Authors: Rocío Uzal-Varela; Francisco Pérez-Fernández; Laura Valencia; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Carlos Platas-Iglesias; Peter Caravan; David Esteban-Gómez Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 5.436