Literature DB >> 1582787

Contrast thresholds for letter identification in retinitis pigmentosa.

K R Alexander1, D J Derlacki, G A Fishman.   

Abstract

To assess mechanisms of foveal vision loss in retinitis pigmentosa (RP), contrast thresholds were measured for the identification of Sloan letters at four adapting field luminances (0.4, 1.4, 2.4, and 3.4 log td) in a group of 16 patients with RP who had best-corrected Snellen visual acuities of 20/30 or better, minimal or no posterior subcapsular cataracts, and no atrophic or cystic-appearing foveal lesions. Letter contrast sensitivities of the patients with RP were reduced below those of a group of ten subjects with normal vision for all letter sizes and at all adapting field luminances. The overall pattern of these results indicated that neither a reduced quantal absorption by foveal cones nor spatial undersampling from a loss of foveal cones accounted for the reductions in letter contrast sensitivities. The findings were most consistent with a uniform increase in intercone spacing in the foveas of this group of patients with RP and mild visual acuity loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1582787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

1.  In vivo imaging of the photoreceptor mosaic in retinal dystrophies and correlations with visual function.

Authors:  Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Steven M Jones; John L Keltner; Scot S Olivier; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Seeing through their eyes: lived experiences of people with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M Prem Senthil; J Khadka; K Pesudovs
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Contrast response properties of magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa assessed by the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Kenneth R Alexander; Aruna S Rajagopalan; William Seiple; Vance M Zemon; Gerald A Fishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Low Vision Enhancement with Head-mounted Video Display Systems: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Ashley D Deemer; Christopher K Bradley; Nicole C Ross; Danielle M Natale; Rath Itthipanichpong; Frank S Werblin; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Effects of GABACR and mGluR1 antagonists on contrast response functions of Sprague-Dawley and P23H rat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Ralph Jensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Visual Contrast Sensitivity Correlates to the Retinal Degeneration in Rhodopsin Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Jiaxin Xiao; Muhammed Yasin Adil; Karen Chang; Zicheng Yu; Lanbo Yang; Tor P Utheim; Dong Feng Chen; Kin-Sang Cho
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  An EZ-Diffusion Model Analysis of Attentional Ability in Patients With Retinal Pigmentosa.

Authors:  Yan-Lin Luo; Yuan-Ying Wang; Su-Fang Zhu; Li Zhao; Yan-Ling Yin; Meng-Wen Geng; Chu-Qi Lei; Yan-Hui Yang; Jun-Fa Li; Guo-Xin Ni
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Contrast visual acuity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa assessed by a contrast sensitivity tester.

Authors:  Maho Oishi; Hajime Nakamura; Masanori Hangai; Akio Oishi; Atsushi Otani; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Apartment residents' and day care workers' exposures to tetrachloroethylene and deficits in visual contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Judith S Schreiber; H Kenneth Hudnell; Andrew M Geller; Dennis E House; Kenneth M Aldous; Michael S Force; Karyn Langguth; Elizabeth J Prohonic; Jean C Parker
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.