Literature DB >> 30151752

Risk factors for short-term recurrent intussusception and reduction failure after ultrasound-guided saline enema.

Gang Shen1, Chuanguang Zhang1, Junfeng Li1, Jing Zhang1, Yongdong Liu1, Zheming Guan2, Qiang Hu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided saline enema to treat intussusception and to analyze the risk factors affecting short-term recurrence and reduction failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected patients who had undergone intussusception reduction via ultrasound-guided saline enema from January 2010 to December 2017. The overall success rate, overall pathologic intussusception rate, and pathologic intussusception rate were calculated in each group. All the patients were divided into two groups: the successfully reduced group and the failed reduction group. Then, the successfully reduced patients were divided into two groups: the short-term recurrence group and the short-term non-recurrence group. The differences between each of the two sets of groups were analyzed, and the risk factors affecting short-term recurrence and failure of intussusception were analyzed.
RESULTS: During the 8-year study period, a total of 1793 patients with intussusception were treated with ultrasound-guided saline enema reduction in our hospital. Among these patients, 1743 (97.2%) experienced successful reduction, 29 (1.6%) had pathologic intussusception, and 1 experienced perforation. After applying the univariate analysis and logistic regressive multivariate analysis, we found that age above 2 years and the absence of fever were risk factors for the early recurrence of intussusception. Pathologic intussusception was a risk factor for reduction failure.
CONCLUSION: The overall success rate of ultrasound-guided saline enemas was 97.2%, and the pathologic intussusception rate was 1.6%. Age above 2 years and the absence of fever were risk factors for short-term recurrence, and pathologic intussusception was a risk factor for the failure of reduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intussusception; Reduction failure; Risk factors; Saline enema; Short-term recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30151752     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4340-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  17 in total

1.  Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: barium, air, or saline?

Authors:  S Shehata; N El Kholi; A Sultan; E El Sahwi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Operative indications in recurrent ileocolic intussusception.

Authors:  Jeremy G Fisher; Eric A Sparks; Christopher G B Turner; Justin D Klein; Elliot Pennington; Faraz A Khan; David Zurakowski; Emily T Durkin; Dario O Fauza; Biren P Modi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Intussusception: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Edwards; Nicholas Pigg; Jesse Courtier; Matthew A Zapala; John D MacKenzie; Andrew S Phelps
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

4.  Intussusception after rotavirus vaccines reported to US VAERS, 2006-2012.

Authors:  Penina Haber; Manish Patel; Yi Pan; James Baggs; Michael Haber; Oidda Museru; Xin Yue; Paige Lewis; Frank Destefano; Umesh D Parashar
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Ultrasound-guided reduction of intussusception: a safe and effective method performed by pediatric surgeons.

Authors:  Stefan Gfroerer; Henning Fiegel; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Xiaolong Xie; Yang Wu; Qi Wang; Yiyang Zhao; Guobin Chen; Bo Xiang
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Nonsurgical management of childhood intussusception: retrospective comparison between sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance.

Authors:  Thomas Ray Sanchez; Brandon Doskocil; Rebecca Stein-Wexler
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Management for intussusception in children.

Authors:  Steven Gluckman; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Angela C Webster; Richard G McGee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Recurrent intussusception in children and infants.

Authors:  Amine Ksia; Sana Mosbahi; Mohamed Ben Brahim; Lassaad Sahnoun; Besma Haggui; Sabrine Ben Youssef; Kais Maazoun; Imed Krichene; Mongi Mekki; Mohsen Belghith; Abdellatif Nouri
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

10.  Is There a Causal Relationship between Intussusception and Food Allergy?

Authors:  Emrah Aydin; Omer F Beşer; Esra Ozek; Soner Sazak; Ensar Duras
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-19
View more
  3 in total

1.  Predictors of failed enema reduction in children with intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pyeong Hwa Kim; Jisun Hwang; Hee Mang Yoon; Jeong-Yong Lee; Ah Young Jung; Jin Seong Lee; Young Ah Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Impact of overweight/obesity on clinical outcomes after reduction for intussusception in children.

Authors:  Jinping Hou; Jinfeng Hou; Xiaohong Die; Jing Sun; Min Zhang; Wei Liu; Yi Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Lactic acid level as an outcome predictor in pediatric patients with intussusception in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jeong-Yong Lee; Young-Hoon Byun; Jun-Sung Park; Jong Seung Lee; Jeong-Min Ryu; Seung Jun Choi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.125

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.