Literature DB >> 25598108

Operative indications in recurrent ileocolic intussusception.

Jeremy G Fisher1, Eric A Sparks1, Christopher G B Turner1, Justin D Klein1, Elliot Pennington1, Faraz A Khan1, David Zurakowski1, Emily T Durkin1, Dario O Fauza1, Biren P Modi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Air-contrast enema (ACE) is standard treatment for primary ileocolic intussusception. Management of recurrences is less clear. This study aimed to delineate appropriate therapy by quantifying the relationship between recurrence and need for bowel resection, pathologic lead points (PLP), and complication rates.
METHODS: After IRB approval, a single institution review of patients with ileocolic intussusception from 1997 to 2013 was performed, noting recurrences, outcomes, and complications. Fisher's exact and t-tests were used.
RESULTS: Of 716 intussusceptions, 666 were ileocecal. Forty-four underwent bowel resection, with 29 PLPs and 9 ischemia/perforation. Recurrence after ACE occurred in 96 (14%). Recurrence did not predict PLP (P=0.25). Recurrence (≥3) was associated with higher resection rate (P=0.03), but not ischemia/perforation (P=0.75). ACE-related complications occurred in 4 (0.5%) patients. Successful initial ACE had 98% negative predictive value for resection and PLP (e.g., after successful ACE, 2% had resections, 2% PLP). After failed initial ACE, 36% received resection, and 23% had PLP (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence is associated with a greater risk of resection but not PLP or ACE-complication. Failed ACE is associated with increased risk for harboring PLP and receiving resection. ACE should be the standard treatment in recurrent intussusception, regardless of number of recurrences.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air contrast enema; Intussusception; Operative indications; Recurrence; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25598108     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for short-term recurrent intussusception and reduction failure after ultrasound-guided saline enema.

Authors:  Gang Shen; Chuanguang Zhang; Junfeng Li; Jing Zhang; Yongdong Liu; Zheming Guan; Qiang Hu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Ileocecal duplication in children: a single-center experience of 115 cases.

Authors:  Jiayu Yan; Waiun Lei; Jun Yan; Cailin Ding; Tingting Liu; Yajun Chen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.860

3.  Does Ileocecal Resection Affect Children's Medium-Long-Term Growth and Defecation Patterns? A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Jiayu Yan; Waiun Lei; Yajun Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  [The Effect of COVID-19 on Pediatric Intussusception: A Retrospective Study of a Single Center in South Korea with 10-Year Experience].

Authors:  Yeo Jin Yoo; Bo-Kyung Je; Ga Young Choi; Jee Hyun Lee; Sunkyu Choi; Ji Young Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Risk factors for recurrent intussusception in children: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wan-Liang Guo; Zhang-Chun Hu; Ya-Lan Tan; Mao Sheng; Jian Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.