Literature DB >> 33974147

Predictors of failed enema reduction in children with intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pyeong Hwa Kim1, Jisun Hwang2, Hee Mang Yoon3, Jeong-Yong Lee4, Ah Young Jung1, Jin Seong Lee1, Young Ah Cho1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of failed enema reduction in children with intussusception.
METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for all studies published over a 20-year time frame, prior to March 25, 2020. Original articles that reported predictors of failed enema reduction were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for successful enema reduction according to various features was calculated. The combined estimates were meta-analytically pooled by random-effects modeling. The risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool. This review was registered to the PROSPERO (CRD42020190178).
RESULTS: A total of 38 studies, comprising 40,133 cases, were included. The shorter duration of symptoms (< 24 h; combined OR, 3.812; 95% CI, 2.150-6.759) and abdominal pain (combined OR, 2.098; 95% CI, 1.405-3.133) were associated with the success (all p < 0.001). Age < 1 year (combined OR, 0.385; 95% CI, 0.166-0.893; p = 0.026), fever (combined OR, 0.519; 95% CI, 0.371-0.725; p < 0.001), rectal bleeding (combined OR, 0.252; 95% CI, 0.165-0.387; p < 0.001), and vomiting (combined OR, 0.497; 95% CI, 0.372-0.664; p < 0.001) were associated with the failed reduction. The ascites (combined OR, 0.127; 95% CI, 0.044-0.368; p = 0.001), left-sided intussusception (combined OR, 0.121; 95% CI, 0.058-0.252; p < 0.001), and trapped fluid (combined OR, 0.179; 95% CI, 0.061-0.525; p = 0.017) on US were associated with the failed reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful predictors for intussusception reduction have been summarized. This evidence can help identify patients who are more likely to fail non-operative reduction and could be potential surgical candidates. KEY POINTS: • A shorter duration of symptoms and presence of abdominal pain were associated with increased probability of success. • Age (less than 1 year), presence of fever, rectal bleeding, vomiting, and presence of ascites, left-sided intussusception, or trapped fluid on ultrasonography were associated with decreased probability of success. • This study suggests that various clinical and ultrasonography predictors would help identify patients who are more likely to fail nonoperative reduction and identify potential preoperative candidates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child; Enema; Intussusception; Meta-analysis; Ultrasonography

Year:  2021        PMID: 33974147     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07935-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  48 in total

Review 1.  Management of intussusception.

Authors:  Erich Sorantin; Franz Lindbichler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Predictors of failed enema reduction in childhood intussusception.

Authors:  Frankie B Fike; Vincent E Mortellaro; George W Holcomb; Shawn D St Peter
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Success with hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in relation to duration of symptoms.

Authors:  E D van den Ende; J H Allema; F W J Hazebroek; P J Breslau
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Intussusception in children: evidence-based diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

Review 5.  Systematic review shows that pathological lead points are important and frequent in intussusception and are not limited to infants.

Authors:  Henning Fiegel; Stefan Gfroerer; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

7.  Paediatric intussusception: epidemiology and outcome.

Authors:  Andrew Jm Blanch; Susan B Perel; Jason P Acworth
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: clinical experience and factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  V G McDermott; T Taylor; S Mackenzie; G M Hendry
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 9.  Intussusception.

Authors:  Muhammad Waseem; Henrietta Kotlus Rosenberg
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.454

10.  Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception.

Authors:  Jiraporn Khorana; Jesda Singhavejsakul; Nuthapong Ukarapol; Mongkol Laohapensang; Jakraphan Siriwongmongkol; Jayanton Patumanond
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  3 in total

1.  Temporal Validation of Chiang Mai University Intussusception Failed Reduction Score (CMUI).

Authors:  Jiraporn Khorana; Chanathip Sayuen; Sutinee Chanaturakarnnon; Butsarin Nate-Anong; Jesda Singhavejsakul; Kanokkan Tepmalai; Sireekarn Chantakhow; Wilai Sathavornvichit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Pathological Intussusceptions in Children Prior to Surgical Intervention.

Authors:  Xu Ting; Duan Xufei; Liu Jiangbin; Xu Weijue; Lv Zhibao; Ye Guogang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  Clinical characteristics of pediatric intussusception and predictors of bowel resection in affected patients.

Authors:  Ting-Hsuan Wu; Go-Shine Huang; Chang-Teng Wu; Jin-Yao Lai; Chien-Chang Chen; Mei-Hua Hu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.