| Literature DB >> 30147848 |
Ethan Zell1, Rong Su2, Hong Li3, Moon-Ho Ringo Ho4, Sungjin Hong2, Tarcan Kumkale5, Sarah D Stauffer6, Gregory Zecca6, Huajian Cai7, Sonia Roccas8, Javier Arce-Michel9, Cristina de Sousa10, Rolando Diaz-Loving11, Maria Mercedes Botero12, Lucia Mannetti13, Claudia Garcia14, Pilar Carrera15, Amparo Cabalero15, Masatake Ikemi16, Darius Chan17, Allan Bernardo18, Fernando Garcia19, Inge Brechan20, Greg Maio21, Dolores Albarracín22.
Abstract
The current research examined whether nations differ in their attitudes toward action and inaction. It was anticipated that members of dialectical East Asian societies would show a positive association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. However, members of non-dialectical European-American societies were expected to show a negative association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. Young adults in 19 nations completed measures of dialectical thinking and attitudes toward action/inaction. Results from multi-level modeling showed, as predicted, that people from high dialecticism nations reported a more positive association in their attitudes toward action and inaction than people from low dialecticism nations. Furthermore, these findings remained after controlling for cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, neuroticism, gross-domestic product, and response style. Discussion highlights the implications of these findings for action/inaction goals, dialecticism, and culture.Entities:
Keywords: action research; attitudes; attitudinal ambivalence; culture and cognition; culture/ethnicity
Year: 2012 PMID: 30147848 PMCID: PMC6103533 DOI: 10.1177/1948550612468774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Psychol Personal Sci ISSN: 1948-5506