| Literature DB >> 30145875 |
Yuwares Malila1, Juthawut U-Chupaj1, Yanee Srimarut1, Premsak Chaiwiwattrakul1, Tanaporn Uengwetwanit2, Sopacha Arayamethakorn2, Veerasak Punyapornwithaya3, Chalutwan Sansamur3, Catherine P Kirschke4, Liping Huang4, Surapun Tepaamorndech1, Massimiliano Petracci5, Wanilada Rungrassamee2, Wonnop Visessanguan1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at investigating white striping (WS) and wooden breast (WB) cases in breast meat collected from commercial broilers.Entities:
Keywords: Breast Meat; Commercial Broiler; Logistic Regression; Meat Quality; White Striping; Wooden Breast
Year: 2018 PMID: 30145875 PMCID: PMC6212750 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1Cases of broiler breasts affected by white striping (WS) and wooden breast (WB) conditions. A total of 183 chicken carcasses were collected from commercial broilers (Ross 308) at the age of 6 weeks or 7 weeks and graded as “medium” and “heavy” based on the carcass weight (medium, weight ≤2.5 kg; heavy, weight >2.5 kg). No samples were fit within the category of “7 weeks, medium”.
Effects of slaughter age, carcass size and meat defects on properties of commercial broilers
| Property | Main effect | Two-factor interaction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| Defect | Age | Size | WS×WB | Age×WS | Age×WB | ||
|
| |||||||
| WS | WB | ||||||
| Carcass weight | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| Breast weight | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| Breast yield | ns | ns | ns | ||||
| Moisture | ns | ns | ns | ||||
| Crude protein | ns | ||||||
| Crude fat | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Ash | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| Total collagen | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Fat:protein ratio | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Collagen:protein ratio | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| pH | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Drip loss | ns | ns | ns | ||||
| Cook loss | ns | ns | ns | ||||
| Hardness | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| Springiness | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| Cohesiveness | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| Chewiness | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
WS, white striping; WB, wooden breast.
Main effects consist of WS (non-WS, mild, moderate and severe), WB (non-WB and WB), age (6 wk and 7 wk) and carcass weight (weight ≤2.5 kg and weight >2.5 kg).
No interactions between carcass weight and other factors, among three-factor or four-factor levels were observed.
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001,
ns, not significant (p≥0.05).
Carcass traits of commercial broilers as affected by white striping and wooden breast defects1)
| Age/carcass weight | Traits | Defect level | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Non-WS | Mild WS | Moderate WS | Severe WS | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Non-WB | Non-WB | WB | Non-WB | WB | Non-WB | WB | ||
| 6 wk/≤2.5 kg | Sample size | 2 | 29 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carcass weight (kg) | 2.3 | 2.3 | nd | 2.4 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Breast weight (g) | 165.5 | 193.1 | nd | 208.2 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Breast yield (%) | 14.8 | 16.9 | nd | 17.5 | nd | nd | nd | |
| 6 wk/>2.5 kg | Sample size | 2 | 34 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Carcass weight (kg) | 2.9±0.2 | 2.8±0.2 | 2.7±0.1 | 2.9±0.3 | 2.9±0.3 | nd | nd | |
| Breast weight (g) | 211.2 | 228.5 | 237.4 | 254.3 | 295.5 | nd | nd | |
| Breast yield (%) | 14.6 | 16.4 | 17.8 | 17.7 | 20.4 | nd | nd | |
| 7 wk/>2.5 kg | Sample size | 0 | 34 | 2 | 38 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Carcass weight (kg) | nd | 3.2±0.2 | 3.3±0.1 | 3.3±0.2 | 3.4±0.3 | 3.4±0.4 | 3.1±0.2 | |
| Breast weight (g) | nd | 286.8±36.2 | 327.5±12.0 | 304.5±30.2 | 312.2±14.3 | 318.6±51.1 | 311.4±8.0 | |
| Breast yield (%) | nd | 17.8±1.6 | 19.7±0.23 | 18.3±1.5 | 18.6±1.3 | 19.0±1.3 | 19.9±1.9 | |
WS, white striping; WB, wooden breast; nd, not detected, indicating that no samples were classified into such category.
Data are presented in mean±standard deviation.
Different superscripts indicate statistical difference within each row (p<0.05).
Chemical compositions of broiler breast meat as affected by white striping and wooden breast defects1)
| Age/carcass weight | Composition | Defect level | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Non-WS | Mild WS | Moderate WS | Severe WS | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Non-WB | Non-WB | WB | Non-WB | WB | Non-WB | WB | ||
| 6 wk/≤2.5 kg | Moisture (%) | 75.4±0.7 | 74.9±0.7 | nd | 75.0±0.8 | nd | nd | nd |
| Crude protein (%) | 22.2±0.1 | 22.3±1.0 | nd | 22.1±0.8 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Crude fat (%) | 1.3±0.2 | 1.3±0.4 | nd | 1.6±0.2 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Ash (%) | 1.21±0.06 | 1.21±0.07 | nd | 1.2±0.1 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Total collagen (mg/g meat) | 1.2 | 2.6 | nd | 3.2 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Fat:protein ratio (%) | 5.9±0.8 | 6.8±1.6 | nd | 7.2±1.1 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Collagen:protein ratio (%) | 0.6 | 1.2 | nd | 1.4 | nd | nd | nd | |
| 6 wk/>2.5 kg | Moisture (%) | 74.6 | 75.0 | 76.5 | 75.0 | 75.4 | nd | nd |
| Crude protein (%) | 23.9 | 22.3 | 20.3 | 22.1 | 21.7 | nd | nd | |
| Crude fat (%) | 1.4±0.3 | 1.6±0.4 | 1.5±0.1 | 1.6±0.3 | 1.4±0.2 | nd | nd | |
| Ash (%) | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 1.18 | 0.97 | nd | nd | |
| Total collagen (mg/g meat) | 1.6 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 4.2 | nd | nd | |
| Fat:protein ratio (%) | 5.7±1.0 | 7.1±1.6 | 7.4±0.6 | 7.2±1.6 | 6.4±0.7 | nd | nd | |
| Collagen:protein ratio (%) | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | nd | nd | |
| 7 wk/>2.5 kg | Moisture (%) | nd | 75.2 | 78.4 | 75.4 | 77.5 | 75.7 | 76.9 |
| Crude protein (%) | nd | 22.0 | 18.6 | 21.8 | 18.7 | 21.0 | 23.9 | |
| Crude fat (%) | nd | 1.5±0.3 | 1.4±0.1 | 1.7±0.5 | 1.6±0.6 | 2.0±1.3 | 1.6±0.2 | |
| Ash (%) | nd | 1.16 | 1.03 | 1.17 | 1.06 | 1.12 | 1.10 | |
| Total collagen (mg/g meat) | nd | 3.3±1.8 | 5.0±2.8 | 2.6±0.5 | 3.0±1.7 | 4.0±1.3 | 3.3±0.01 | |
| Fat:protein ratio (%) | nd | 6.9±1.4 | 7.8±0.9 | 7.7±2.1 | 8.3±2.5 | 9.8±6.9 | 7.5±1.2 | |
| Collagen:protein ratio (%) | nd | 1.5±0.9 | 2.7±1.7 | 1.2±0.3 | 1.6±1.1 | 2.0±0.8 | 1.5±0.1 | |
WS, white striping; WB, wooden breast; nd, not detected, indicating that no samples were classified into such category.
Data are presented in mean±standard deviation.
Different superscripts indicate statistical difference within each row (p<0.05).
Technological properties of broiler breast meat affected by white striping (WS) and wooden breast (WB) defects1)
| Age/carcass weight | Property | Defect level | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Non-WS | Mild WS | Moderate WS | Severe WS | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Non-WB | Non-WB | WB | Non-WB | WB | Non-WB | WB | ||
| 6 wk/≤2.5 kg | pH | 5.83±0.01 | 6.00±0.22 | nd | 5.94±0.13 | nd | nd | nd |
| Drip loss (%) | 1.0±0.4 | 0.6±0.2 | nd | 0.7±0.2 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Cook loss (%) | 19.0±3.4 | 16.5±3.7 | nd | 16.4±2.5 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Hardness (N) | 25.0±0.04 | 26.1±5.5 | nd | 24.9±3.6 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Springiness | 0.63±0.01 | 0.65±0.03 | nd | 0.63±0.02 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Cohesiveness | 0.41±0.01 | 0.40±0.04 | nd | 0.42±0.07 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Chewiness (N) | 6.4±0.2 | 6.0±2.3 | nd | 6.6±1.3 | nd | nd | nd | |
| 6 wk/>2.5 kg | pH | 5.65 | 6.00 | 6.10 | 5.98 | 5.93 | nd | nd |
| Drip loss (%) | 1.1±0.3 | 0.7±0.4 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.9±0.5 | nd | nd | |
| Cook loss (%) | 17.2±1.6 | 16.5±4.9 | 16.0±3.5 | 12.8±4.1 | 10.5±4.0 | nd | nd | |
| Hardness (N) | 21.2±2.9 | 24.8±5.0 | 23.2±6.9 | 25.4±5.8 | 25.4±8.6 | nd | nd | |
| Springiness | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.61 | nd | nd | |
| Cohesiveness | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.47 | nd | nd | |
| Chewiness (N) | 5.4±1.1 | 6.1±2.3 | 6.5±2.0 | 7.4±2.2 | 7.5±3.7 | nd | nd | |
| 7 wk/>2.5 kg | pH | nd | 5.95±0.13 | 6.06±0.23 | 5.97±0.10 | 6.03±0.12 | 6.07±0.07 | 5.98±0.02 |
| Drip loss (%) | nd | 1.0 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.1 | |
| Cook loss (%) | nd | 20.4 | 20.3 | 19.5 | 24.5 | 22.1 | 29.7 | |
| Hardness (N) | nd | 27.4 | 26.4 | 28.3 | 27.4 | 30.9 | 43.7 | |
| Springiness | nd | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.72 | |
| Cohesiveness | nd | 0.43±0.07 | 0.50±0.01 | 0.42±0.07 | 0.41±0.10 | 0.37±0.04 | 0.42±0.02 | |
| Chewiness (N) | nd | 7.6 | 9.0 | 7.4 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 13.5 | |
WS, white striping; WB, wooden breast; nd, not detected, indicating that no samples were classified into such category.
Data are presented in mean±standard deviation.
Different superscripts indicate statistical difference within each row (p<0.05).
Figure 2Histological images of the pectoralis major muscles depicted at 20× magnification. The breast muscle samples were collected from the broilers at the age of 6 weeks exhibiting various white striping (WS) severity with or without wooden breast (WB) condition. The broilers were graded as “medium” and “heavy” based on the carcass weight (medium, weight ≤2.5 kg; heavy, weight >2.5 kg). The fibers were eosin-stained and found as the polygonal structure. The nuclei were detected peripherally and internally in myofibers. Adipocytes (asterisks), macrophage deposition (arrows), and connective tissues (arrow heads) were found among the muscle fibers. Examples of necrotic fibers, observed as internal cell lesions, are marked with five-point stars. Scale bar = 100 μm for all images.
Coefficients, standard error and odds ratio for the variables included in the logistic regression models
| Model | Predictor | Estimated coefficient | Standard error | Odds ratio (95% CI) | Residual deviance | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: | 377.93 | 393.93 | ||||
| White striping | Slaughter age (6 wk) | −0.829 | 0.321 | 0.437 | - | - |
| Percent of breast weight | 0.411 | 0.099 | 1.509 | - | - | |
| Model 2: | 76.28 | 82.28 | ||||
| Wooden breast | Slaughter age (6 wk) | 0.100 | 0.662 | 1.105 (0.302, 4.043) | - | - |
| Percent of breast weight | 0.476 | 0.190 | 1.610 | - | - |
CI, confidence interval; AIC, akaike information criterion.
p<0.05,
p<0.001.