Literature DB >> 30144337

Contemporary use of and outcomes associated with ultra-low contrast volume in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Hitinder S Gurm1, Milan Seth1, Simon R Dixon2, P Michael Grossman1, Devraj Sukul1, Thomas Lalonde3, Louis Cannon4, Daniel West5, Ryan D Madder6, D Adam Lauver7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) increases in a nonlinear fashion with increasing volume of contrast media. Prior studies recommend limiting contrast volume to less than three times the estimated creatinine clearance (CC). Recently, a number of operators have reported successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using even lower volumes of contrast.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and outcomes associated with ultra-low contrast volume among patients undergoing PCI.
METHODS: We assessed the prevalence and outcomes associated with use of ultra-low contrast volume among 75 393 patients undergoing PCI in Michigan between July 2014 and June 2017 in the BMC2 (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium) registry. Ultra-low contrast volume was defined as contrast volume less than or equal to the patient's estimated CC. Patients receiving dialysis at the time of the procedure were excluded.
RESULTS: Ultra-low contrast volume was used in 13% of procedures with the majority of these patients being at low risk of renal complications. Compared with patients who received a contrast volume between one and three times the CC, use of ultra-low volume of contrast was associated with a significantly lower incidence of AKI (aOR 0.682, 95% CI 0.566-0.821, P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of need for dialysis (aOR = 0.341, 95% CI 0.165-0.704, P = 0.003). These benefits were most evident in the patients with a high baseline predicted risk of AKI.
CONCLUSIONS: A small but clinically significant number of patients are treated with ultra-low contrast volume. Ultra-low contrast volume use is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of AKI or need for dialysis. It may be prudent to consider this new threshold when performing PCI on patients who are at an increased risk of AKI.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCI; comparative effectiveness/patient centered outcomes research; complications; contrast agent; health care outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; renal disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30144337     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and Management of AKI in ACS Patients Undergoing Invasive Treatments.

Authors:  Ravi A Thakker; Aiham Albaeni; Haider Alwash; Syed Gilani
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 2.  Strategies for Renal Protection in Cardiovascular Interventions.

Authors:  Ziad A Ali; Javier Escaned; Dariusz Dudek; Jai Radhakrishnan; Keyvan Karimi Galougahi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.101

3.  Absolute zero-contrast percutaneous coronary intervention under intravascular ultrasound guidance in chronic kidney disease patients - From despair to hope?

Authors:  Prathap Kumar; Blessvin Jino; Stalin Roy; Ali Shafeeq; Manu Rajendran
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  The impact of percutaneous coronary intervention using the novel dynamic coronary roadmap system.

Authors:  Takayuki Yabe; Toshiya Muramatsu; Reiko Tsukahara; Masatsugu Nakano; Hideyuki Takimura; Mami Kawano; Tasuku Hada; Takanori Ikeda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Patient-centered contrast thresholds to reduce acute kidney injury in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ali O Malik; Amit Amin; Kevin Kennedy; Mohammed Qintar; Ali Shafiq; Roxana Mehran; John A Spertus
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  A prospective study of contrast preservation using ultra-low contrast delivery technique versus standard automated contrast injector system in coronary procedures.

Authors:  Adam Stys; Maheedhar Gedela; Udit Bhatnagar; Marian Petrasko; Hazem Dawoud; Tadeusz Malinski; Tomasz Stys
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2019-09-10

7.  DyeVert Contrast Reduction System Use in Patients Undergoing Coronary and/or Peripheral Angiography: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Tarantini; Anand Prasad; Sudhir Rathore; Shweta Bansal; Regine Gottfried; Alexander R Rosenkranz; Carlo Briguori; Mohsen Yaghoubi; Atefeh Mashayekhi; Mehdi Javanbakht; Eoin Moloney
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 8.  When Prevention is Truly Better than Cure: Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Tea Isaac; Salima Gilani; Neal S Kleiman
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2022-09-06

Review 9.  The Pathophysiology and the Management of Radiocontrast-Induced Nephropathy.

Authors:  Eunjung Cho; Gang-Jee Ko
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.