Ali O Malik1, Amit Amin2, Kevin Kennedy3, Mohammed Qintar4, Ali Shafiq5, Roxana Mehran6, John A Spertus4. 1. University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO. Electronic address: aomalik@saint-lukes.org. 2. Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO. 3. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO. 4. University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO. 5. Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI. 6. Mount Sinai Doctors Faculty Practice, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contrast volume used during percutaneous coronary intervention has a direct relationship with contrast-associated acute kidney injury. While several models estimate the risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, only the strategy of limiting contrast volume to 3 × estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) gives actionable estimates of safe contrast volume doses. However, this method does not consider other patient characteristics associated with risk, such as age, diabetes or heart failure. METHODS: Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry acute kidney injury risk model, we developed a novel strategy to define safe contrast limits by entering a contrast term into the model and using it to meet specific (eg, 10%) relative risk reductions. We then estimated acute kidney injury rates when our patient-centered model-derived thresholds were and were not exceeded using data from CathPCI version 5 between April 2018 and June 2019. We repeated the same analysis in a sub-set of patients who received ≤3 × eGFR contrast. RESULTS: After excluding patients on hemodialysis, below average risk (<7%), missing data and multiple percutaneous coronary interventions, our final analytical cohort included 141,133 patients at high risk for acute kidney injury. The rate of acute kidney injury was 10.0% when the contrast thresholds derived from our patient-centered model were met and 18.2% when they were exceeded (P < .001). In patients who received contrast ≤3 × eGFR (n = 82,318), contrast-associated acute kidney injury rate was 9.8% when the contrast thresholds derived from our patient centered model were met and 14.5% when they were exceeded (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A novel strategy for developing personalized contrast volume thresholds, provides actionable information for providers that could decrease rates of contrast-associated acute kidney injury. This strategy needs further prospective testing to assess efficacy in improving patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Contrast volume used during percutaneous coronary intervention has a direct relationship with contrast-associated acute kidney injury. While several models estimate the risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, only the strategy of limiting contrast volume to 3 × estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) gives actionable estimates of safe contrast volume doses. However, this method does not consider other patient characteristics associated with risk, such as age, diabetes or heart failure. METHODS: Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry acute kidney injury risk model, we developed a novel strategy to define safe contrast limits by entering a contrast term into the model and using it to meet specific (eg, 10%) relative risk reductions. We then estimated acute kidney injury rates when our patient-centered model-derived thresholds were and were not exceeded using data from CathPCI version 5 between April 2018 and June 2019. We repeated the same analysis in a sub-set of patients who received ≤3 × eGFR contrast. RESULTS: After excluding patients on hemodialysis, below average risk (<7%), missing data and multiple percutaneous coronary interventions, our final analytical cohort included 141,133 patients at high risk for acute kidney injury. The rate of acute kidney injury was 10.0% when the contrast thresholds derived from our patient-centered model were met and 18.2% when they were exceeded (P < .001). In patients who received contrast ≤3 × eGFR (n = 82,318), contrast-associated acute kidney injury rate was 9.8% when the contrast thresholds derived from our patient centered model were met and 14.5% when they were exceeded (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A novel strategy for developing personalized contrast volume thresholds, provides actionable information for providers that could decrease rates of contrast-associated acute kidney injury. This strategy needs further prospective testing to assess efficacy in improving patient outcomes.
Authors: Hitinder S Gurm; Kreton Mavromatis; Barry Bertolet; Dean J Kereiakes; Amit P Amin; Atman P Shah; George S Hanzel; Siddhartha Rao; Joseph L Thomas; Gautam Kumar Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ritesh Gupta; Hitinder S Gurm; Deepak L Bhatt; Derek P Chew; Stephen G Ellis Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Roxana Mehran; Eve D Aymong; Eugenia Nikolsky; Zoran Lasic; Ioannis Iakovou; Martin Fahy; Gary S Mintz; Alexandra J Lansky; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; George Dangas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-10-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Warren K Laskey; Charles Jenkins; Faith Selzer; Oscar C Marroquin; Robert L Wilensky; Ruchira Glaser; Howard A Cohen; David R Holmes Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-07-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Joseph Walker Keach; Maggie A Stanislawski; Anna E Barón; Mary E Plomondon; Paula Langner; Amit Amin; Heather M Gilmartin; Stephen Waldo; Thomas M Maddox Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Chenxi Huang; Shu-Xia Li; Shiwani Mahajan; Jeffrey M Testani; Francis P Wilson; Carlos I Mena; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus; Bobak J Mortazavi; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-11-01
Authors: Matthew T James; Bryan J Har; Benjamin D Tyrrell; Peter D Faris; Zhi Tan; John A Spertus; Stephen B Wilton; William A Ghali; Merril L Knudtson; Tolulope T Sajobi; Neesh I Pannu; Scott W Klarenbach; Michelle M Graham Journal: JAMA Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Bryan Ma; Peter Faris; Bryan J Har; Ben Tyrrell; Eleanor Benterud; John A Spertus; Neesh Pannu; Braden J Manns; Michelle M Graham; Matthew T James Journal: CJC Open Date: 2021-10-23