Literature DB >> 30143840

18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor in penile cancer.

André Salazar1, Eduardo Paulino Júnior2, Paulo Guilherme O Salles3, Raul Silva-Filho4, Edna A Reis5, Marcelo Mamede6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Penile cancer (PC) is a rare neoplasm with an aggressive behavior and variable prognosis. Lymph node (LN) involvement and pathological features of the primary lesion have been proven to be the most important survival factors. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose labelled with fluorine-18 (18F-FDG PET/CT) provides information on tumor staging and works as a prognostic factor, with promising results in other carcinomas. The aim of the present study is to evaluate PET/CT as a prognostic factor in PC.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients (mean age 56.6 y) diagnosed with penile squamous cell carcinoma were prospectively evaluated from 2012 to 2014. All subjects underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before treatment and were regularly followed after surgery.
RESULTS: Out of the 53 patients selected, 17 (32.1%) had localized disease (cT1-2) and 24 (45.3%) had palpable nodes (cN+). Partial penile amputation was performed in 38 patients (71.7%) and inguinal lymphadenectomy (LND) in 30 (56.6%). From the LND group, 16 (53.3%) presented with positive neoplastic cells (pN+). Patients with more aggressive disease had a significantly (p = 0.019) higher 18F-FDG tumor uptake (pSUVmax), while inguinal LN uptake (nSUVmax) was able to recognize metastatic LN (p = 0.039). Some pathological prognostic features, when presented, have shown significant changes in pSUVmax values. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed and specific cutoff values of pSUVmax were evaluated to determine sensitivity and specificity. Regarding regional LNs, PET/CT presented a 76.2% accuracy in cN+ patients. After a 39-month follow up, pSUVmax of 16.6 (p = 0.0001) and nSUVmax of 6.5 (p = 0.019) were established as the ideal values to predict cancer-specific survival. The multivariate analysis confirmed nSUVmax as a predictor for LN metastasis (p = 0.043) and pSUVmax as a mean to estimate survival rate (p = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study showed promising results on the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic tool for PC, using specific cutoff values of pSUVmax and nSUVmax.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; PET/CT; Penile cancer; Prognostic value; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30143840     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4128-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  32 in total

1.  Positron emission tomography detection of metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  G C Ravizzini; M Wagner; S Borges-Neto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A positron-emission transaxial tomograph for nuclear imaging (PETT).

Authors:  M M Ter-Pogossian; M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; N A Mullani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Reevaluation of the standardized uptake value for FDG: variations with body weight and methods for correction.

Authors:  Y Sugawara; K R Zasadny; A W Neuhoff; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  H L van Westreenen; M Westerterp; P M M Bossuyt; J Pruim; G W Sloof; J J B van Lanschot; H Groen; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer.

Authors:  Bernhard Scher; Michael Seitz; Martin Reiser; Edwin Hungerhuber; Klaus Hahn; Reinhold Tiling; Peter Herzog; Maximilian Reiser; Peter Schneede; Stefan Dresel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The management of regional lymph nodes in patients with penile carcinoma and reliability of sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Eric Wespes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer.

Authors:  Ben Hughes; Joost Leijte; Majid Shabbir; Nick Watkin; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  FDG-PET/CT tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy and progression-free survival in esophageal cancer: correlation with histopathology results.

Authors:  Marcelo Mamede; Paula Abreu-E-Lima; Maria Raquel Oliva; Vânia Nosé; Harvey Mamon; Victor H Gerbaudo
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  Histologic grade and perineural invasion are more important than tumor thickness as predictor of nodal metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma invading 5 to 10 mm.

Authors:  Elsa F Velazquez; Gustavo Ayala; Hao Liu; Alcides Chaux; Magali Zanotti; Jose Torres; Soung I Cho; Jose E Barreto; Fernando Soares; Antonio L Cubilla
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  Clinical applications of PET in oncology.

Authors:  Eric M Rohren; Timothy G Turkington; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  An update on treatment of penile cancer.

Authors:  Juskaran Chadha; Jad Chahoud; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 5.485

2.  Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Pan Gao; Tianle Zhu; Jingjing Gao; Hu Li; Xi Liu; Xiansheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Imaging for the Initial Staging and Post-Treatment Surveillance of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; John C Norton; Kristin K Porter; Janelle T West; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.