Literature DB >> 18460979

Histologic grade and perineural invasion are more important than tumor thickness as predictor of nodal metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma invading 5 to 10 mm.

Elsa F Velazquez1, Gustavo Ayala, Hao Liu, Alcides Chaux, Magali Zanotti, Jose Torres, Soung I Cho, Jose E Barreto, Fernando Soares, Antonio L Cubilla.   

Abstract

Penile squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) invading to a depth inferior to 5 mm usually have very low risk for regional metastasis, whereas tumors thicker than 10 mm have a high metastatic potential. A significant number of squamous cell carcinomas, however, belong to an intermediate category (5 to 10 mm in thickness) in which the incidence of regional lymph node metastasis is very difficult to predict. Consequently, a frequent clinical dilemma is whether to perform or not inguinal dissection in this group of lesions. The objective of this study was to evaluate multiple risk factors for regional metastasis in tumors 5 to 10-mm thick. One hundred thirty-four partial penectomies with invasive carcinomas 5 to 10-mm thick, all of which with corresponding inguinal lymph node dissection, were evaluated. Factors evaluated were--patient's age, anatomic site, histologic grade, tumor thickness, anatomic levels of invasion, and vascular and perineural invasion. Grades were classified as 1, well; 2, moderately; and 3, poorly differentiated. To evaluate independent significance of various prognostic factors, a logistic regression analysis was performed, and a nomogram was prepared to evaluate metastatic risk according to histologic grade and perineural invasion. Groin metastasis was found in 66 of 134 patients (49%). High histologic grade and perineural invasion were statistically significant pathologic factors associated with groin metastasis. Nodal metastases were found in 2 of 25 grade 1 (8%), 24 of 46 grade 2 (52%), and 40 of 63 grade 3 carcinomas (63%) (P value 0.0001). Of 48 patients with perineural invasion, metastasis was found in 33 cases (69%) (P value 0.001). The average tumor thickness, anatomic level of invasion, and presence of vascular invasion were not statistically significantly different in metastasizing and nonmetastasizing neoplasms. Fifty percent of tumors invading 5 to 10 mm were not associated with metastasis and may be spared a nodal dissection. In this subset of patients, high histologic grade and perineural invasion were significant and useful risk factors associated with regional metastasis. The probability of inguinal node metastasis in patients with grade 1 tumors without perineural invasion is almost nonexistent whereas for high-grade tumors associated with perineural invasion is near 80%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460979     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181641365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  22 in total

Review 1.  [The significance of lymphadenectomy in the management of penile cancer].

Authors:  M Angerer-Shpilenya; G Jakse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Prognostic factors in patients with penile cancer after surgical management.

Authors:  Shuguang Wen; Wenbiao Ren; Bichen Xue; Yi Fan; Yongjun Jiang; Chunming Zeng; Yujia Li; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  [Pathology and histopathological evaluation of penile cancer].

Authors:  A Erbersdobler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Penile cancer: epidemiology and treatment.

Authors:  Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Rafael Malagoli Rocha; Stenio Cassio Zequi; Isabela Werneck Cunha; Fernando Augusto Soares
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Penile cancer: impact of age at diagnosis on morphology and prognosis.

Authors:  Geise Rezende Paiva; Iguaracyra Barreto de Oliveira Araújo; Daniel Abensur Athanazio; Luiz Antonio Rodrigues de Freitas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  What you need to know: updates in penile cancer staging.

Authors:  Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; Jasreman Dhillon; Viraj Master; Rodney Davis; Ali J Hajiran; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor in penile cancer.

Authors:  André Salazar; Eduardo Paulino Júnior; Paulo Guilherme O Salles; Raul Silva-Filho; Edna A Reis; Marcelo Mamede
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  [Conventional grading vs. molecular grading : Decision aids for clinical routine].

Authors:  C Kakies; D Louise Dräger; P Spiess; O W Hakenberg; C Protzel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  The role of pathologic prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Antonio L Cubilla
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Penile cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Matthew C Biagioli; Mario A Eisenberger; Richard E Greenberg; Harry W Herr; Brant A Inman; Deborah A Kuban; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Jeff Michalski; Lance Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Jerome P Richie; Wade J Sexton; William U Shipley; Eric J Small; Donald L Trump; Geoffrey Wile; Timothy G Wilson; Mary Dwyer; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 11.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.