Literature DB >> 17762438

FDG-PET/CT tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy and progression-free survival in esophageal cancer: correlation with histopathology results.

Marcelo Mamede1, Paula Abreu-E-Lima, Maria Raquel Oliva, Vânia Nosé, Harvey Mamon, Victor H Gerbaudo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic abilities of PET tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity for the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and progression-free survival in patients with esophageal cancer.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer were retrospectively evaluated. The patients underwent PET-CT imaging before and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Images were evaluated visually and quantitatively with a three-dimensional threshold-based region-growing program, which calculates SUVm, SUVa of the entire tumor, metabolic tumor length (Lm) and volume (Vm) before and after therapy (SUVm1, SUVm2, SUVa1, SUVa2, Lm1, Lm2, Vm1, and Vm2, respectively). Percentage changes in these metabolic variables before and after therapy were also calculated (%SUVm, %SUVa, %Lm, %Vm, respectively).
RESULTS: SUVm1 (P = 0.018), SUVa1 (P = 0.019), Lm1 (P = 0.016), and Vm1 (P = 0.016) correlated with T-status. Advanced stage tumors (T3 + T4) had significantly higher glucose metabolism, metabolic length, and volume. Moreover, Lm1 >47.4 mm and Vm1 >29 cm3 were the best predictors of the level of tumor invasiveness. SUVm1 >12.7 and SUVa1 >5.9 could differentiate patients with positive lymph nodes from those without at presentation. %SUVa >32.3% and the SUVa1 >5.5 proved to be reliable predictors of pathologic response. SUVa2 >3.55 and SUVm2 >4.35 were the best predictors of disease progression during follow-up, with the latter having the best prognostic value.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that FDG-PET tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity play a definite role in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and progression-free survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17762438     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31803993f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  26 in total

1.  Impact of partial-volume effect correction on the predictive and prognostic value of baseline 18F-FDG PET images in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Adrien Le Pogam; Dimitris Visvikis; Olivier Pradier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy Klayton; Tianyu Li; Jian Q Yu; Lanea Keller; Jonathan Cheng; Steven J Cohen; Neal J Meropol; Walter Scott; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

4.  Prognostic significance of endoluminal ultrasound-defined disease length and tumor volume (EDTV) for patients with the diagnosis of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; S Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis; B Vicki Dave; Claire E Rawlinson; David Chan; Mark Robinson; Tom D Crosby
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Update: modern approaches to the treatment of localized esophageal cancer.

Authors:  James Welsh; Arya Amini; Anna Likhacheva; Jeremy Erasmus J; Daniel Gomez; Marta Davila; Reza J Mehran; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jeffrey Lee H; Manoop S Bhutani; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Volumetric assessment in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  David J Murphy; Ritu R Gill
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

7.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor in penile cancer.

Authors:  André Salazar; Eduardo Paulino Júnior; Paulo Guilherme O Salles; Raul Silva-Filho; Edna A Reis; Marcelo Mamede
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Jolinta Lin; Seth Kligerman; Rakhi Goel; Payam Sajedi; Mohan Suntharalingam; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

10.  Establishment and characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patient-derived xenograft mouse models for preclinical drug discovery.

Authors:  Jingchuan Zhang; Dongxian Jiang; Xiaojing Li; Jing Lv; Liang Xie; Li Zheng; Paul R Gavine; Qin Hu; Yuan Shi; Lijie Tan; Di Ge; Songtao Xu; Leon Li; Lifang Zhu; Yingyong Hou; Qun Wang
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.662

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.