Literature DB >> 30140500

Fluoroscopic Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion Using LMA CTrach, C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope.

Tülay Şahin1, Zehra İpek Arslan1, Gür Akansel2, Onur Balaban3, Derya Berk4, Mine Solak1, Kamil Toker5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endotracheal intubation should be performed with care when cervical spine (C-spine) injury is suspected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the movement of the C-spine using fluoroscopy during intubation with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) CTrach, C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope.
METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, observational, controlled trial. In total, 22 surgical patients aged 18-65 years planned to undergo operation under general anaesthesia, were enrolled. X-ray images of the C-spine were obtained using fluoroscopy with the patients' head in a neutral position. All patients underwent laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade, LMA CTrach and C-MAC videolaryngoscope, and fluoroscopic images of the C-spine were obtained. All the patients were intubated at the last laryngoscopy simulation (using the C-MAC). The atlanto-occipital distance (AOD) and angles between C0C1, C0C2, C0C3, C0C4, C1C2 and C2C3 lines were measured and compared between each device.
RESULTS: The mean AOD was measured as 20.4 mm in a neutral position, which decreased to 13.1, 17.2 and 12.3 mm after the insertion of the Macintosh laryngoscope, LMA CTrach and C-MAC videolaryngoscope, respectively. The differences were significant (p<0.001). Moreover, significant difference was noted in C0C2, C0C3 and C1C2 angles with the insertion of the three devices (p<0.001). The LMA CTrach resulted in significantly lesser C-spine movements in C0C2, C0C3 and C0C4 angles compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The LMA CTrach resulted in lesser C-spine movements compared to Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope. In case of the C-spine injury, LMA CTrach may be preferred and may cause fewer traumas during endotracheal intubation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine motion; LMA C Trach; fluoroscopy; videolaryngoscopy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30140500      PMCID: PMC5858888          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.53367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  29 in total

1.  Segmental cervical spine movement with the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line stabilization in patients with cervical pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  S Kihara; S Watanabe; J Brimacombe; N Taguchi; Y Yaguchi; Y Yamasaki
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Critical care of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P A Ball
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The reliability of the Bellhouse test for evaluating extension capacity of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex.

Authors:  Yasunari Urakami; Ichiro Takenaka; Motohiro Nakamura; Hiroshi Fukuyama; Kazuyoshi Aoyama; Tatsuo Kadoya
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation using the Macintosh and Bullard laryngoscopes, the bonfils fibrescope and the intubating laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  B M Wahlen; E Gercek
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Movement of the upper cervical spine during laryngoscopy: a comparison of the Bonfils intubation fibrescope and the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Authors:  C Rudolph; J P Schneider; J Wallenborn; L Schaffranietz
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  The LMA CTrach, a new laryngeal mask airway for endotracheal intubation under vision: evaluation in 100 patients.

Authors:  E H C Liu; R W L Goy; F G Chen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Cervical spine motion during flexible bronchoscopy compared with the Lo-Pro GlideScope.

Authors:  D M Wong; A Prabhu; S Chakraborty; G Tan; E M Massicotte; R Cooper
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Success of tracheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized trial of the LMA Fastrach and LMA CTrach.

Authors:  Eugene H Liu; Raymond W Goy; Yvonne Lim; Fun-Gee Chen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Upper cervical spine movement during intubation with different airway devices.

Authors:  Taylan Kılıç; Erkan Goksu; Dilek Durmaz; Günay Yıldız
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  LMA C Trach aided endotracheal intubation in simulated cases of cervical spine injury: A series of 30 cases.

Authors:  Deepshikha C Tripathi; Pramila S Jha; Lopa P Trivedi; Shilpa M Doshi; Brijesh Modia
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.