Literature DB >> 10866912

Segmental cervical spine movement with the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line stabilization in patients with cervical pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery.

S Kihara1, S Watanabe, J Brimacombe, N Taguchi, Y Yaguchi, Y Yamasaki.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We quantified the extent and distribution of segmental cervical movement produced by the intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) during manual in-line stabilization in 20 anesthetized patients with cervical pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery. All patients had neurological symptoms preoperatively. The ILM was inserted with the head and neck in the neutral position. Intubation was facilitated by transillumination of the neck with a lightwand. Cervical movement was recorded with single-frame lateral radiographic images taken 1) immediately before induction (baseline); 2) during ILM insertion (insertion); 3) when transillumination was first seen at the cricothyroid membrane (intubation A); 4) when the tube was being advanced into the trachea (intubation B); and 5) during ILM removal (removal). Radiographic images were digitized and the degree of flexion/extension and posterior movement measured for the occiput (C0) through to C5. During ILM insertion, C0-5 were flexed by an average of 1-1.6 degrees (all P < 0.05). During intubation A/B, C0-4 were flexed by an average of 1.4-3.0 degrees (all P < 0.01), but C5 was unchanged. During ILM removal, C0-3 were flexed by an average of 1 degree (all: P < 0.05), but C3-5 were unchanged. During insertion and intubation A/B, C2-5 were displaced posteriorly by an average of 0.5-1.0 mm (all: P < 0.05). During removal, there was no change at C1-5. Neurological symptoms improved in all patients. We conclude that the ILM produces segmental movement of the cervical spine despite manual in-line stabilization in patients with cervical spine pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery. This motion is in the opposite direction to direct laryngoscopy, suggesting that different approaches to airway management may be more appropriate depending on the nature of the cervical instability. IMPLICATIONS: The intubating laryngeal mask produces segmental movement of the cervical spine, despite manual in-line stabilization in patients with cervical spine pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery. This motion is in the opposite direction to direct laryngoscopy, suggesting that different approaches to airway management may be more appropriate depending on the nature of the cervical instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10866912     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Massive subcutaneous emphysema, bilateral pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and pneumoscrotum after multiple direct laryngoscopies: an autopsy case report.

Authors:  Yuko Ono; Yoshinori Okubo; Katsuhiko Hashimoto; Ryota Inokuchi; Hajime Odajima; Choichiro Tase; Kazuaki Shinohara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  A comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in cadaver models of global ligamentous instability at c1-2.

Authors:  Adam L Wendling; Patrick J Tighe; Bryan P Conrad; Tezcan Ozrazgat Baslanti; Marybeth Horodyski; Glenn R Rechtine
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Fluoroscopic Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion Using LMA CTrach, C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope.

Authors:  Tülay Şahin; Zehra İpek Arslan; Gür Akansel; Onur Balaban; Derya Berk; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-02-01

4.  Neurological deterioration during intubation in cervical spine disorders.

Authors:  Padmaja Durga; Barada Prasad Sahu
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Anesthetic considerations for patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Fang-Ping Bao; Hong-Gang Zhang; Sheng-Mei Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  Airway management in cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Naola Austin; Vijay Krishnamoorthy; Arman Dagal
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.