| Literature DB >> 30140295 |
Jia Liu1, Ziqiang Li1, Hua Liu2, Xianhua Wang3, Chunxiao Lv1, Ruihua Wang1, Deqin Zhang2, Yan Li4, Xi Du1, Yanfen Li1, Baohe Wang1, Yuhong Huang1.
Abstract
Tangzhiqing tablet (TZQ) is derived from Tangzhiqing formula, which has been used to regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in China for hundreds of years. However, as a new Chinese patent medicine, its clinical indication is not clear. To explore the clinical indication and effect on the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a pilot clinical trial and metabolomics study were carried out. In the clinical study, T2DM patients were divided into three groups and treated with TZQ, placebo, or acarbose for 12 weeks, respectively. The metabolomic study based on UPLC Q-TOF MS was performed including patients with hypertriglyceridemia in TZQ and placebo groups and healthy volunteers. The clinical results showed that TZQ could reduce glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting insulin. For patients with hypertriglyceridemia in TZQ group, the levels of HbA1c all decreased and were correlated with the baseline level of triglyceride. Metabonomics data showed a significant difference between patients and healthy volunteers, and 17 biomarkers were identified. After 12-week treatment with TZQ, 11 biomarkers decreased significantly (p<0.05), suggesting that TZQ could improve the metabolomic abnormalities in these participants. In conclusion, the clinical indication of TZQ was T2DM with hypertriglyceridemia, and its target was related to glycerophospholipid metabolism.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30140295 PMCID: PMC6081579 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5490491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flow diagram of the clinical trial.
The comparison of baseline characteristics among three groups (mean ± S.D.).
| Variable | TZQ-F Group | Placebo Group | Acarbose Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n=15) | (n=15) | (n=16) | |
| Sex (M/F) | 8/7 | 12/3 | 9/7 |
| Age (year) | 62.93±6.11 | 57.40±9.74 | 58.07±5.23 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.99±3.17 | 28.56±3.87 | 25.90±2.27 |
| Waistline (cm) | 95.43±11.24 | 100.23±8.36 | 94.87±8.44 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.64±0.81 | 7.59±1.03 | 7.25±0.79 |
| FINS (mIU/L) | 16.64±8.65 | 15.00±7.07 | 15.10±14.57 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 7.44±1.17 | 7.75±1.07 | 7.62±1.17 |
| OGTT2hBG (mmol/L) | 13.96±4.02 | 13.76±3.15 | 13.91±4.68 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.52±0.61 | 2.06±1.05 | 2.35±1.38 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.92±0.70 | 4.87±0.82 | 4.74±0.78 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.86±0.52 | 2.87±0.61 | 2.59±0.63 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.38±0.39 | 1.17±0.25 | 1.22±0.35 |
Note: data were analyzed using ANOVA. p>0.05 (among three groups). FBG: fasting blood glucose; OGTT 2hBG: oral glucose tolerance test 2 h blood glucose; HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin; BMI: body mass index; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
The changes comparison of clinical characteristics before and after treatment in three groups (mean ± S.D.).
| Variable | TZQ Group (n=15) | Placebo Group (n=15) | Acarbose Group (n=16) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.99±3.17 | 25.41±3.44 | 28.56±3.87 | 28.53±3.44 | 25.90±2.27 | 25.69±2.33 |
| Waistline (cm) | 95.43±11.24 | 92.77±10.29 | 100.23±8.36 | 100.60±8.29 | 94.87±8.44 | 93.63±7.74 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.64±0.81 | 7.52±1.18 | 7.59±1.03 | 7.67±0.74 | 7.25±0.79 | 7.16±0.92 |
| FINS (mIU/L) | 16.64±8.65 | 14.28±8.29 | 15.00±7.07 | 15.73±7.77 | 15.10±14.57 | 10.42±4.97 △ |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 7.44±1.17 | 7.85±2.11 | 7.75±1.07 | 7.98±1.43 | 7.62±1.17 | 7.27±1.22 |
| OGTT2hBG (mmol/L) | 13.96±4.02 | 13.72±4.89 | 13.76±3.15 | 13.90±4.65 | 13.91±4.68 | 12.03±4.30 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.52±0.61 | 1.88±1.51 | 2.06±1.05 | 2.17±1.24 | 2.35±1.38 | 1.81±1.18 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.92±0.70 | 4.99±0.93 | 4.87±0.82 | 4.95±1.05 | 4.74±0.78 | 4.56±0.90 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.86±0.52 | 2.91±0.70 | 2.87±0.61 | 2.85±0.79 | 2.59±0.63 | 2.52±0.73 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.38±0.39 | 1.30±0.40 | 1.17±0.25 | 1.17±0.30 | 1.22±0.35 | 1.24±0.40 |
Note: data were analyzed using paired t-test or covariance analysis. p< 0.05 (compared with the same group before treatment, paired t-test), △p < 0.05 (compared with placebo group, covariance analysis). FBG: fasting blood glucose; OGTT 2hBG: oral glucose tolerance test 2 h blood glucose; HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin; BMI: body mass index; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 2The relationship between the decrease of HbA1c and the corresponding TG baseline value (TG>1.7 mmol/L) in TZQ group (n=5).
The comparison of baseline characteristics between case group and normal group in metabolomics (mean ± SD).
| Variable | Normal group (n=5) | Case group (n=10) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TZQ group (n=5) | placebo group (n=5) | ||||
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD |
| mean±SD |
| |
| Sex (M/F) | 2/3 | 2/3 | 4/1 | ||
| Age (year) | 60.60±1.95 | 62.60±6.43 | 0.524 | 49.80±8.76 | 0.027 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.82±0.92 | 24.92±3.80 | 0.047 | 29.32±4.37 | 0.003 |
| Waistline (cm) | 73.60±4.72 | 93.30±16.10 | 0.031 | 98.40±7.27 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 4.66±0.92 | 7.84±0.75 | <0.001 | 7.96±0.71 | <0.001 |
| FINS (mIU/L) | 9.50±4.29 | 16.71±8.87 | 0.140 | 14.66±5.90 | 0.153 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 4.66±0.50 | 6.89±1.30 | 0.007 | 8.29±1.34 | <0.001 |
| OGTT2hBG (mmol/L) | 9.26±0.92 | 12.38±1.32 | 0.002 | 14.42±1.46 | <0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.04±0.06 | 2.24±0.42 | <0.001 | 2.61±0.47 | <0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 3.47±0.68 | 5.29±0.64 | 0.002 | 4.88±0.39 | 0.004 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.88±0.61 | 3.06±0.41 | 0.007 | 2.88±0.36 | 0.013 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.50±0.22 | 1.21±0.26 | 0.087 | 0.95±0.28 | 0.009 |
Note: data were analyzed using independent sample t test. FBG: fasting blood glucose; OGTT2hBG: oral glucose tolerance test 2 h blood glucose; HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin; BMI: body mass index; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 3Principal components analysis (PCA) scores plot of case group and normal group (a); case group, normal group, and TZQ group (b); and case group, normal group, and placebo group (c).
The potential biomarkers and possible metabolite pathways.
| m/z | tR | Metabolite | Class | HMDB | VIP |
| Trend | Metabolic pathways |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 181.1559 | 1.52 | D-Galactose | Carbohydrate | 00143 | 1.5497 | <0.001 | up | Galactose metabolism |
| 567.3018 | 2.13 | UDP-glucose | 00286 | 1.3043 | 0.002 | up | ||
| 132.1018 | 1.94 | L-Leucine | amino acid | 00687 | 1.4244 | <0.001 | up | Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis |
| 182.0809 | 1.85 | L-Tyrosine | 00158 | 1.1778 | 0.002 | up | ||
| 496.3386 | 4.16 | LysoPC(16:0) | Glycerophospholipid | 10382 | 1.4823 | <0.001 | up | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 524.3685 | 5.15 | LysoPC(18:0) | 10384 | 1.0618 | 0.008 | up | ||
| 518.3238 | 4.79 | LysoPC(18:3) | 10387 | 1.5689 | 0.007 | up | ||
| 466.2898 | 3.83 | LysoPC(14:1) | 10380 | 1.3510 | <0.001 | up | ||
| 772.5782 | 8.97 | PC(15:0/20:2) | 07946 | 1.1258 | 0.004 | up | ||
| 810.6019 | 9.38 | PC(16:0/22:4) | 07988 | 1.0647 | 0.008 | up | ||
| 676.4853 | 8.26 | PC(14:0/14:1) | 07867 | 1.5373 | <0.001 | up | ||
| 684.4608 | 9.54 | PE(14:0/18:4) | 08832 | 1.4224 | <0.001 | up | ||
| 712.4935 | 9.99 | PE(14:0/20:4) | 08838 | 1.5114 | <0.001 | up | ||
| 699.5945 | 11.93 | DG(22:0/20:5) | glyceride | 07607 | 1.4373 | <0.001 | up | |
| 577.4806 | 11.03 | DG(15:0/18:3) | 07076 | 1.005 | 0.014 | up | ||
| 302.3058 | 8.48 | Sphinganine | Sphingolipid | 00269 | 1.4622 | <0.001 | down | Sphingolipid metabolism |
| 371.3699 | 9.81 | Cholest-5-ene | Cholestene | 00941 | 1.3602 | <0.001 | down | - - - |
Note: Data were analyzed by Student's t-tests. Trend: Case group versus Normal group.
The changes comparison of the peak intensity of the potential biomarkers before and after treatment in two groups (mean ± S.D.).
| Biomarkers | TZQ Group (n=15) | Placebo Group (n=15) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment |
| Before treatment | After treatment |
| |
| D-Galactose | 2097.23±555.64 | 1796.80±1050.53 | 0.610 | 2217.10±464.44 | 2486.60±1038.89 | 0.579 |
| UDP-glucose | 1220.75±685.75 | 468.26±308.37 | 0.155 | 682.36±217.58 | 882.12±213.60 | 0.086 |
| L-Leucine | 3490.38±274.78 | 3397.90±76.80 | 0.470 | 3505.53±239.78 | 4093.26±1029.48 | 0.331 |
| L-Tyrosine | 1667.88±208.55 | 1573.02±135.06 | 0.276 | 1579.23±185.80 | 1847.48±480.83 | 0.237 |
| LysoPC(16:0) | 9833.36±1318.86 | 3633.52±1197.10 | <0.001 | 6021.73±1873.12 | 5961.09±4533.85 | 0.969 |
| LysoPC(18:0) | 751.23±118.43 | 742.64±381.31 | 0.958 | 863.39±81.89 | 850.71±315.53 | 0.926 |
| LysoPC(18:3) | 18365.49±1468.24 | 8804.01±1598.84 | <0.001 | 16399.05±1399.12 | 15440.55±4240.13 | 0.513 |
| LysoPC(14:1) | 626.84±296.06 | 157.11±18.67 | 0.026 | 517.33±293.07 | 299.37±381.13 | 0.294 |
| PC(15:0/20:2) | 781.42±142.81 | 489.05±169.67 | 0.001 | 840.39±64.15 | 893.06±417.55 | 0.778 |
| PC(16:0/22:4) | 7471.85±2200.75 | 3462.13±407.02 | 0.015 | 6396.02±2356.44 | 4846.48±1015.19 | 0.222 |
| PC(14:0/14:1) | 1081.27±366.46 | 186.24±47.03 | 0.005 | 1062.27±340.92 | 1141.66±292.78 | 0.665 |
| PE(14:0/18:4) | 816.29±661.96 | 226.31±196.64 | 0.198 | 360.05±91.35 | 511.65±125.01 | 0.124 |
| PE(14:0/20:4) | 1659.73±611.85 | 642.14±142.21 | 0.026 | 1867.68±441.45 | 1896.16±1102.87 | 0.966 |
| DG(22:0/20:5) | 1171.63±515.18 | 365.11±60.69 | 0.017 | 935.65±219.09 | 916.33±549.78 | 0.952 |
| DG(15:0/18:3) | 1549.78±708.90 | 415.63±292.41 | 0.007 | 779.78±508.12 | 835.61±482.38 | 0.860 |
| Sphinganine | 3594.59±5522.04 | 1203.80±287.44 | 0.396 | 1302.85±151.44 | 1205.19±355.10 | 0.451 |
| Cholest-5-ene | 28.69±29.76 | 37.82±34.07 | 0.341 | 7.89±4.14 | 17.73±18.12 | 0.326 |
Note: data were analyzed using paired t-test.
Figure 4The main metabolic pathways based on potential biomarkers.
Figure 5The relationship between insulin resistance and 17 potential biomarkers. Red represented the biomarkers whose peak intensity rose in case group, and green represented the biomarkers whose peak intensity reduced in case group (CK, choline kinase; CT, CTP phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase; CPT, CDP-choline:1,2-diacylglycerol cholinephos-photransferase; lp-PLA2: phospholipase A2; EK, Ethanolamine kinase; ET, phosphoethanolamine cytidylyltransferase; EPT, CDP-ethanolamine:1,2-diacylglycerol ethanolaminephosphotransferase; PEMT, phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; SAMe, S-adenosylmethionine).