Literature DB >> 30139837

Comparative Effectiveness of an mTOR-Based Systemic Therapy Regimen in Advanced, Metaplastic and Nonmetaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Reva K Basho1, Clinton Yam1, Michael Gilcrease2, Rashmi K Murthy3, Thorunn Helgason4, Daniel D Karp4, Funda Meric-Bernstam4,5,6, Kenneth R Hess7, Vicente Valero3, Constance Albarracin2, Jennifer K Litton3, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor3,8, David Hong4, Razelle Kurzrock4,9, Gabriel N Hortobagyi3, Filip Janku4, Stacy L Moulder10,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with subtypes having different "targetable" molecular aberrations. Metaplastic breast cancers (MpBCs) are typically TNBCs and commonly have alterations in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. We previously reported efficacy for an mTOR-based chemotherapy regimen in MpBC. To determine if tumor subtype influences prognosis, we compared treatment outcomes of patients with MpBC with those of patients with nonmetaplastic TNBC receiving an mTOR-based systemic therapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced MpBC and nonmetaplastic TNBC were treated at our institution from April 16, 2009, through November 4, 2014, using mTOR inhibition (temsirolimus or everolimus) with liposomal doxorubicin and bevacizumab (DAT/DAE). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between tumor histology and outcomes. Multivariable models were adjusted for all covariates.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients with nonmetaplastic TNBC and 59 patients with advanced MpBC were treated with DAT/DAE. MpBC patients were older (p = .002) and less likely to have a history of bevacizumab use (p = .023). Median PFS for the nonmetaplastic TNBC and MpBC patients was 2.5 months and 4.8 months, respectively. This difference in PFS was statistically significant on univariable (p = .006) but not multivariable analysis (p = .087). Median OS for the nonmetaplastic TNBC and MpBC patients was 3.7 months and 10.0 months, respectively (p = .0003). MpBC remained significantly associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis (p < .0001).
CONCLUSION: In our study, DAT/DAE appeared to be more effective in MpBC compared with nonmetaplastic TNBC. These data support patient selection for targeted therapy in TNBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Metaplastic breast cancers (MpBCs) represent <1% of all breast cancers, demonstrate mesenchymal differentiation, and are typically resistant to chemotherapy. Patients with advanced MpBC treated with an mTOR-based systemic therapy regimen had better long-term outcomes compared with patients with nonmetaplastic triple-negative breast cancer treated with the same regimen, suggesting that metaplastic histology may predict benefit from agents targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mesenchymal; Metaplastic breast cancer; Triple‐negative breast cancer; mTOR inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30139837      PMCID: PMC6291334          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  45 in total

1.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Predictive factors of response to first-line chemotherapy in 1426 women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M Robain; J Y Pierga; M Jouve; B Asselain; V Diéras; P Beuzeboc; T Palangié; T Dorval; J M Extra; S Scholl; P Pouillart
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  Predictive factors for response to cytotoxic treatment in advanced breast cancer: a review.

Authors:  J Sjöström; C Blomqvist
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast: V. Metaplastic carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells.

Authors:  E S Wargotz; H J Norris
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  So-Youn Jung; Hyun Yul Kim; Byung-Ho Nam; Sun Young Min; Seung Ju Lee; Chansung Park; Youngmee Kwon; Eun-A Kim; Kyoung Lan Ko; Kyung Hwan Shin; Keun Seok Lee; In Hae Park; Seeyoun Lee; Seok Won Kim; Han-Sung Kang; Jungsil Ro
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. II. Spindle cell carcinoma.

Authors:  E S Wargotz; P H Deos; H J Norris
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  A systematic review of bevacizumab efficacy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Iben Kümler; Ole Grummedal Christiansen; Dorte Lisbet Nielsen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. IV. Squamous cell carcinoma of ductal origin.

Authors:  E S Wargotz; H J Norris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A phase I trial of liposomal doxorubicin, bevacizumab, and temsirolimus in patients with advanced gynecologic and breast malignancies.

Authors:  John W Moroney; Matthew P Schlumbrecht; Thorunn Helgason; Robert L Coleman; Stacy Moulder; Aung Naing; Diane C Bodurka; Filip Janku; David S Hong; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Pathobiology, prognosis, and targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma: exploiting the hypoxia-induced pathway.

Authors:  Allan J Pantuck; Gang Zeng; Arie S Belldegrun; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  16 in total

1.  Delivery of Anti-miRNA for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy Using RNA Nanoparticles Targeting Stem Cell Marker CD133.

Authors:  Hongran Yin; Gaofeng Xiong; Sijin Guo; Congcong Xu; Ren Xu; Peixuan Guo; Dan Shu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Molecular Characterization and Prospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Metaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Clinton Yam; Nour Abuhadra; Ryan Sun; Beatriz E Adrada; Qing-Qing Ding; Jason B White; Elizabeth E Ravenberg; Alyson R Clayborn; Vicente Valero; Debu Tripathy; Senthilkumar Damodaran; Banu K Arun; Jennifer K Litton; Naoto T Ueno; Rashmi K Murthy; Bora Lim; Luis Baez; Xiaoxian Li; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Alistair M Thompson; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gaiane M Rauch; Rosalind P Candelaria; Lei Huo; Stacy L Moulder; Jeffrey T Chang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 13.801

3.  Clinicopathologic and genetic features of metaplastic breast cancer with osseous differentiation: a series of 6 cases.

Authors:  Xue Chao; Wanlin Tan; Julia Y Tsang; Gary M Tse; Jintao Hu; Ping Li; Jinghui Hou; Mei Li; Jiehua He; Peng Sun
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  Does treatment sequence affect outcomes in patients with metaplastic breast cancer?

Authors:  Oluwatomi L Ladipo; Yi Ren; Keenan B Caddell; Anuyuga Sampathkumar; Chandra A Almond; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Complete Response of Chemo-Refractory Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer to Paclitaxel-Immunotherapy Combination.

Authors:  Adher D Al Sayed; Mahmoud A Elshenawy; Asma Tulbah; Taher Al-Tweigeri; Hazem Ghebeh
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2019-11-06

6.  The effect of a ketogenic diet and synergy with rapamycin in a mouse model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yiyu Zou; Susan Fineberg; Alexander Pearlman; Richard D Feinman; Eugene J Fine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Case Report: Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells in a Triple Negative Spindle-Cell Metaplastic Breast Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Tania Rossi; Michela Palleschi; Davide Angeli; Michela Tebaldi; Giovanni Martinelli; Ivan Vannini; Maurizio Puccetti; Francesco Limarzi; Roberta Maltoni; Giulia Gallerani; Francesco Fabbri
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Authors:  Amy C Moreno; Yan Heather Lin; Isabelle Bedrosian; Yu Shen; Gildy V Babiera; Simona F Shaitelman
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Modulatory Role of microRNAs in Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Basal-Like Phenotype.

Authors:  Andrea Angius; Paolo Cossu-Rocca; Caterina Arru; Maria Rosaria Muroni; Vincenzo Rallo; Ciriaco Carru; Paolo Uva; Giovanna Pira; Sandra Orrù; Maria Rosaria De Miglio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Prodigiosin/PU-H71 as a novel potential combined therapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): preclinical insights.

Authors:  Mohammed Moustapha Anwar; Manal Shalaby; Amira M Embaby; Hesham Saeed; Mona M Agwa; Ahmed Hussein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.