Literature DB >> 33526302

Does treatment sequence affect outcomes in patients with metaplastic breast cancer?

Oluwatomi L Ladipo1, Yi Ren2, Keenan B Caddell1, Anuyuga Sampathkumar1, Chandra A Almond1, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We compared characteristics and outcomes by treatment sequence among patients with metaplastic breast cancer (MBC), an aggressive subtype.
METHODS: Women ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed Stage I-III MBC from 2003 to 2018 who received any treatment in our health system were identified. Unadjusted overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences between recipients of neoadjuvant (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT).
RESULTS: Of the 91 MBC patients identified, 60 received chemotherapy. NACT recipients (n = 20, median age 46.5 y) were younger than ACT recipients (n = 40, median age 60.5 y, p < 0.001) but similar with regards to race and radiation receipt. There was no significant OS difference between NACT and ACT recipients (log-rank p = 0.15), which remained true when patients were stratified by age (≥50 y vs < 50 y).
CONCLUSIONS: Among MBC patients, NACT recipients were younger than ACT recipients, but there was no survival difference by treatment sequence.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant; Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Metaplastic; Neoadjuvant; Treatment sequence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33526302      PMCID: PMC8134971          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  12 in total

1.  Metaplastic Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in 2500 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Oncology Database.

Authors:  Cecilia T Ong; Brittany M Campbell; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Jeremy Force; Allison Hall; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Metaplastic breast cancer has a poor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Authors:  Zahraa Al-Hilli; Grace Choong; Michael G Keeney; Daniel W Visscher; James N Ingle; Matthew P Goetz; James W Jakub
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Metaplastic Breast Cancer-The Case for Doing Less and More.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: report of three cases.

Authors:  R J Brenner; R R Turner; V Schiller; R D Arndt; A Giuliano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Norikazu Masuda; Soo-Jung Lee; Shoichiro Ohtani; Young-Hyuck Im; Eun-Sook Lee; Isao Yokota; Katsumasa Kuroi; Seock-Ah Im; Byeong-Woo Park; Sung-Bae Kim; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Shinji Ohno; Shintaro Takao; Kenjiro Aogi; Hiroji Iwata; Joon Jeong; Aeree Kim; Kyong-Hwa Park; Hironobu Sasano; Yasuo Ohashi; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Clinical Significance of Breast-only and Node-only Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT): A Review of 20,000 Breast Cancer Patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Yi Ren; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Nina Tamirisa; Jeremy Force; Judy C Boughey; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB)--a case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Ling-Ming Tseng; Tsai-Wang Chang; Yao-Lung Kuo; Chia-Ming Hsieh; Shou-Tung Chen; Sou-Jen Kuo; Chin-Cheng Su; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway for the Treatment of Mesenchymal Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evidence From a Phase 1 Trial of mTOR Inhibition in Combination With Liposomal Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab.

Authors:  Reva K Basho; Michael Gilcrease; Rashmi K Murthy; Thorunn Helgason; Daniel D Karp; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kenneth R Hess; Shelley M Herbrich; Vicente Valero; Constance Albarracin; Jennifer K Litton; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Nuhad K Ibrahim; James L Murray; Kimberly B Koenig; David Hong; Vivek Subbiah; Razelle Kurzrock; Filip Janku; Stacy L Moulder
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Dramatic response of metaplastic breast cancer to chemo-immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sylvia Adams
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.