Literature DB >> 35507014

Molecular Characterization and Prospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Metaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Clinton Yam1, Nour Abuhadra1, Ryan Sun2, Beatriz E Adrada3, Qing-Qing Ding4, Jason B White1, Elizabeth E Ravenberg1, Alyson R Clayborn1, Vicente Valero1, Debu Tripathy1, Senthilkumar Damodaran1, Banu K Arun1, Jennifer K Litton1, Naoto T Ueno1, Rashmi K Murthy1, Bora Lim5, Luis Baez6, Xiaoxian Li7, Aman U Buzdar1, Gabriel N Hortobagyi1, Alistair M Thompson8, Elizabeth A Mittendorf9,10, Gaiane M Rauch3, Rosalind P Candelaria3, Lei Huo4, Stacy L Moulder1, Jeffrey T Chang11,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer that is commonly triple-negative and poorly responsive to neoadjuvant therapy in retrospective studies. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: To better define clinical outcomes and correlates of response, we analyzed the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy, survival outcomes, and genomic and transcriptomic profiles of the pretreatment tumors in a prospective clinical trial (NCT02276443). A total of 211 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including 39 with MpBC, received doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-based neoadjuvant therapy.
RESULTS: Although not meeting the threshold for statistical significance, patients with MpBCs were less likely to experience a pCR (23% vs. 40%; P = 0.07), had shorter event-free survival (29.4 vs. 32.2 months, P = 0.15), metastasis-free survival (30.3 vs. 32.4 months, P = 0.22); and overall survival (32.6 vs. 34.3 months, P = 0.21). This heterogeneity is mirrored in the molecular profiling. Mutations in PI3KCA (23% vs. 9%, P = 0.07) and its pathway (41% vs. 18%, P = 0.02) were frequently observed and enriched in MpBCs. The gene expression profiles of each histologically defined subtype were distinguishable and characterized by distinctive gene signatures. Among nonmetaplastic (non-Mp) TNBCs, 10% possessed a metaplastic-like gene expression signature and had pCR rates and survival outcomes similar to MpBC.
CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations will determine if metaplastic-like tumors should be treated more similarly to MpBC in the clinic. The 23% pCR rate in this study suggests that patients with MpBC should be considered for NAT. To improve this rate, a pathway analysis predicted enrichment of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and RTK/MAPK pathways in MpBC, which may serve as new targetable vulnerabilities. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35507014      PMCID: PMC9250637          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  58 in total

1.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.

Authors:  W Evan Johnson; Cheng Li; Ariel Rabinovic
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Metaplastic Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in 2500 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Oncology Database.

Authors:  Cecilia T Ong; Brittany M Campbell; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Jeremy Force; Allison Hall; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A diverse array of cancer-associated MTOR mutations are hyperactivating and can predict rapamycin sensitivity.

Authors:  Brian C Grabiner; Valentina Nardi; Kıvanc Birsoy; Richard Possemato; Kuang Shen; Sumi Sinha; Alexander Jordan; Andrew H Beck; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  Slug and Sox9 cooperatively determine the mammary stem cell state.

Authors:  Wenjun Guo; Zuzana Keckesova; Joana Liu Donaher; Tsukasa Shibue; Verena Tischler; Ferenc Reinhardt; Shalev Itzkovitz; Aurelia Noske; Ursina Zürrer-Härdi; George Bell; Wai Leong Tam; Sendurai A Mani; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

Authors:  R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Giatri Dave; Harry Cosmatos; Tri Do; Kenneth Lodin; Dolly Varshney
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Giovanni Corso; Samuele Frassoni; Antonia Girardi; Elisa De Camilli; Emilia Montagna; Mattia Intra; Luca Bottiglieri; Alessandra Margherita De Scalzi; Denise Mattar Fanianos; Francesca Magnoni; Alessandra Invento; Antonio Toesca; Fabio Conforti; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Giuseppe Viale; Marco Angelo Colleoni; Paolo Veronesi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemistry as a Companion Diagnostic Approach to Predict Clinical Response to Enzalutamide in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Varun Kumar; Jianjun Yu; Vernon Phan; Iulia Cristina Tudor; Amy Peterson; Hirdesh Uppal
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-11

9.  Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics.

Authors:  Bryan T Hennessy; Ana-Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Michael Z Gilcrease; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Ju-Seog Lee; Jane Fridlyand; Aysegul Sahin; Roshan Agarwal; Corwin Joy; Wenbin Liu; David Stivers; Keith Baggerly; Mark Carey; Ana Lluch; Carlos Monteagudo; Xiaping He; Victor Weigman; Cheng Fan; Juan Palazzo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Laura K Nolden; Nicholas J Wang; Vicente Valero; Joe W Gray; Charles M Perou; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Standard operating procedure for somatic variant refinement of sequencing data with paired tumor and normal samples.

Authors:  Erica K Barnell; Peter Ronning; Katie M Campbell; Kilannin Krysiak; Benjamin J Ainscough; Lana M Sheta; Shahil P Pema; Alina D Schmidt; Megan Richters; Kelsy C Cotto; Arpad M Danos; Cody Ramirez; Zachary L Skidmore; Nicholas C Spies; Jasreet Hundal; Malik S Sediqzad; Jason Kunisaki; Felicia Gomez; Lee Trani; Matthew Matlock; Alex H Wagner; S Joshua Swamidass; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.