Literature DB >> 30136375

Understanding the Hawthorne effect in wound research-A scoping review.

Van Nb Nguyen1, Charne Miller1, Janine Sunderland1, William McGuiness1.   

Abstract

The Hawthorne Effect (HE) is considered a methodological artefact in research, although its definition and influence on research outcomes lack consensus. This review explored how this term has been mentioned and discussed in the area of wound research. A scoping review was conducted on ProQuest Central, Scopus, EbscoHost, and online databases of indexed wound journals using the methodological framework by Arksey and Malley. A review protocol was applied to detail key terms, truncation and Boolean operators, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Search findings were reported using PRISMA guidelines. A total of 38 articles reporting primary evidence were identified. Three themes emerged from the review: wound researchers' awareness of HE, the acknowledgement of the existence or otherwise of HE, and the mentioning of HE in passing. These results reflect a lack of attention to and understanding and awareness of the HE in the area of wound research. It is suggested that the HE receives more attention as a methodological concern, and its potential influence is considered and mitigated when planning future studies. Recommendations are provided to minimise the impact of the HE on the rigour of the research and confidence afforded to research findings.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Hawthorne effect; observer bias; observer effect; wound research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30136375      PMCID: PMC7949616          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  53 in total

Review 1.  An observational study to assess an electronic point-of-care wound documentation and reporting system regarding user satisfaction and potential for improved care.

Authors:  Beth Florczak; Anne Scheurich; John Croghan; Philip Sheridan; Debra Kurtz; William McGill; Bonny McClain
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Preventing facial pressure ulcers in patients under non-invasive mechanical ventilation: a randomised control trial.

Authors:  D Peña Otero; D Vazquez Domínguez; L Hernanz Fernández; A Santano Magariño; V Jimenez González; J V García Klepzing; J V Beneit Montesinos
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.072

3.  Surgical audit: variations in wound infection rates according to definition.

Authors:  S F Mishriki; D J W Law; P J Jeffery
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1993-09-02       Impact factor: 2.072

4.  A pilot study exploring quality of life experienced by patients undergoing negative-pressure wound therapy as part of their wound care treatment compared to patients receiving standard wound care.

Authors:  Karen J Ousey; Jeanette Milne; Leanne Cook; John Stephenson; Warren Gillibrand
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  The effectiveness of a hyperoxygenated fatty acid compound in preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  J E Torra i Bou; T Segovia Gómez; J Verdú Soriano; A Nolasco Bonmatí; J Rueda López; M Arboix i Perejamo
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  The Effectiveness of EMLA as a Primary Dressing on Painful Chronic Leg Ulcers: Effects on Wound Healing and Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Anne Purcell; Thomas Buckley; Judith Fethney; Jennie King; Wendy Moyle; Andrea P Marshall
Journal:  Int J Low Extrem Wounds       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.057

7.  The prevention of heel pressure ulcers using a hydropolymer dressing in surgical patients.

Authors:  Th C M Bots; B F G Apotheker
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.072

8.  Pain at first dressing change after toenail avulsion: the experience of nurses, patients and an observer: 1.

Authors:  B King
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  Preventing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a point prevalence study.

Authors:  Suzanne Stewart; Janet S Box-Panksepp
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  The effects of cancer research participation on patient experience: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  L McGrath-Lone; H Ward; C Schoenborn; S Day
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.520

View more
  3 in total

1.  Protocol for Symptom Experience, Management, Outcomes, and Adherence in Women Receiving Breast Cancer Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bethany D Nugent; Maura K McCall; Mary Connolly; Susan R Mazanec; Susan M Sereika; Catherine M Bender; Margaret Q Rosenzweig
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 2.  Understanding the Hawthorne effect in wound research-A scoping review.

Authors:  Van Nb Nguyen; Charne Miller; Janine Sunderland; William McGuiness
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Cross-sectional study on knowledge and attitude of telemedicine in medical students of Nepal.

Authors:  Bijay Kunwar; Ayushma Dhungana; Binay Aryal; Arjun Gaire; Aramva Bikram Adhikari; Rajeev Ojha
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.