Literature DB >> 22391956

An observational study to assess an electronic point-of-care wound documentation and reporting system regarding user satisfaction and potential for improved care.

Beth Florczak1, Anne Scheurich, John Croghan, Philip Sheridan, Debra Kurtz, William McGill, Bonny McClain.   

Abstract

The integration of information technology into daily patient care potentially provides a means to standardize care and enable continuous quality improvement through improved communication among care teams. A 2-month observational study was conducted on 38 residents with pressure ulcers at a 51-bed skilled nursing facility to rate the Ease of Use and Wound Management Effectiveness of a point-of-care electronic wound documentation system. Nine nurses evaluated the use of handheld "smart phone" devices equipped with a digital camera to document pressure ulcer assessment and treatment at point of care. Ease of Use (five items) was scored on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = very easy); Wound Management Effectiveness (eight items) was scored on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = very effective). Statistically significant mean changes in nurses' ratings were found for baseline compared to 2-month follow-up by paired t-test. Ease of Use ratings across the five criteria increased from an overall mean of 3.3 at baseline to 4.7 at follow-up (P = 0.5), while Wound Management Effectiveness increased from an overall mean of 3.3 at baseline to 4.4 at follow-up (P = 0.5) . The greatest gains for single items were reviewing wound progress (mean difference = 2.35; P = 0.000) and recognizing changes in wound status (mean difference = 1.78; P = 0.001) within the Ease of Use and Wound Management Effectiveness scales, respectively. The smallest change occurred in reading charts and notes (mean difference = 0.89) and ability to determine resident's risk level (mean difference = 0.39). Further research is needed to assess use of a wound documentation system in this and other settings, as well as to ascertain validity and reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  7 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the Hawthorne effect in wound research-A scoping review.

Authors:  Van Nb Nguyen; Charne Miller; Janine Sunderland; William McGuiness
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Diagnosis of Skin Lesions Using Photographs Taken With a Mobile Phone: An Online Survey of Primary Care Physicians.

Authors:  Francesc X Marin-Gomez; Josep Vidal-Alaball; Pere Roura Poch; Carles Janes Sariola; Rosa Taberner Ferrer; Jacobo Mendioroz Peña
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

3.  Staff perspectives on the usability of electronic patient records for planning and delivering dementia care in nursing homes: a multiple case study.

Authors:  Kate Shiells; Angie Alejandra Diaz Baquero; Olga Štěpánková; Iva Holmerová
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Digital Technologies to Support Nursing Care: Results of a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kai Huter; Tobias Krick; Dominik Domhoff; Kathrin Seibert; Karin Wolf-Ostermann; Heinz Rothgang
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-12-09

5.  Infection Probability Index: Implementation of an Automated Chronic Wound Infection Marker.

Authors:  Franziska Schollemann; Janosch Kunczik; Henriette Dohmeier; Carina Barbosa Pereira; Andreas Follmann; Michael Czaplik
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Development and validation of a web-based survey on the use of personal communication devices by hospital registered nurses: pilot study.

Authors:  Deborah L McBride; Sandra A Levasseur; Dongmei Li
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2013-11-26

7.  Measuring the effectiveness of digital nursing technologies: development of a comprehensive digital nursing technology outcome framework based on a scoping review.

Authors:  Tobias Krick; Kai Huter; Kathrin Seibert; Dominik Domhoff; Karin Wolf-Ostermann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.