Literature DB >> 30135230

Blood Culture Turnaround Time in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals and Implications for Laboratory Process Optimization.

Ying P Tabak1, Latha Vankeepuram1, Gang Ye1, Kay Jeffers2, Vikas Gupta3, Patrick R Murray4.   

Abstract

The rapid identification of blood culture isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results play critical roles for the optimal treatment of patients with bloodstream infections. Whereas others have looked at the time to detection in automated culture systems, we examined the overall time from specimen collection to actionable test results. We examined four points of time, namely, blood specimen collection, Gram stain, organism identification (ID), and AST reports, from electronic data from 13 U.S. hospitals for the 11 most common, clinically significant organisms in septic patients. We compared the differences in turnaround times and the times from when specimens were collected and the results were reported in the 24-h spectrum. From January 2015 to June 2016, 165,593 blood specimens were collected, of which, 9.5% gave positive cultures. No matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry was used during the study period. Across the 10 common bacterial isolates (n = 6,412), the overall median (interquartile range) turnaround times were 0.80 (0.64 to 1.08), 1.81 (1.34 to 2.46), and 2.71 (2.46 to 2.99) days for Gram stain, organism ID, and AST, respectively. For all positive cultures, approximately 25% of the specimens were collected between 6:00 a.m. and 11:59 a.m. In contrast, more of the laboratory reporting times were concentrated between 6:00 a.m. and 11:59 a.m. for Gram stain (43%), organism ID (78%), and AST (82%), respectively (P < 0.001). The overall average turnaround times from specimen collection for Gram stain, organism ID, and AST were approximately 1, 2, and 3 days, respectively. The laboratory results were reported predominantly in the morning hours. Laboratory automation and work flow optimization may play important roles in reducing the microbiology result turnaround time.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood culture; clinical microbiology; laboratory automation; laboratory workflow

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30135230      PMCID: PMC6258864          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00500-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  32 in total

1.  Use of positive blood cultures for direct identification and susceptibility testing with the vitek 2 system.

Authors:  Marina de Cueto; Esther Ceballos; Luis Martinez-Martinez; Evelio J Perea; Alvaro Pascual
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  What happens when automated blood culture instrument detect growth but there are no technologists in the microbiology laboratory?

Authors:  Thomas Savinelli; Stephen Parenteau; Leonard A Mermel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Direct inoculation method using BacT/ALERT 3D and BD Phoenix System allows rapid and accurate identification and susceptibility testing for both Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative rods in aerobic blood cultures.

Authors:  Shota Yonetani; Mitsuhiro Okazaki; Koji Araki; Hiroshi Makino; Yoko Fukugawa; Takahiro Okuyama; Hiroaki Ohnishi; Takashi Watanabe
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Inappropriate antibiotic therapy in Gram-negative sepsis increases hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Scott T Micek; Emily C Welch; Joshua A Doherty; Richard M Reichley; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Attributable burden of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Ying P Tabak; Marya D Zilberberg; Richard S Johannes; Xiaowu Sun; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Direct inoculation of positive blood cultures using the Phoenix system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Walter Florio; Simona Barnini; Paola Morici; Antonella Lupetti
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Integrating Rapid Diagnostics and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Two Community Hospitals Improved Process Measures and Antibiotic Adjustment Time.

Authors:  Ashley M Lockwood; Katherine K Perez; William L Musick; Judy O Ikwuagwu; Engie Attia; Oyejoke O Fasoranti; Patricia L Cernoch; Randall J Olsen; James M Musser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Integrating rapid pathogen identification and antimicrobial stewardship significantly decreases hospital costs.

Authors:  Katherine K Perez; Randall J Olsen; William L Musick; Patricia L Cernoch; James R Davis; Geoffrey A Land; Leif E Peterson; James M Musser
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 9.  Antibiotic de-escalation for bloodstream infections and pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Paul; Y Dickstein; A Raz-Pasteur
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  The Clinical Impact of Rapid, Direct MALDI-ToF Identification of Bacteria from Positive Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Kathryn French; Jason Evans; Hannah Tanner; Savita Gossain; Abid Hussain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Laboratory automation reduces time to report of positive blood cultures and improves management of patients with bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vittorio De Socio; Francesco Di Donato; Riccardo Paggi; Chiara Gabrielli; Alessandra Belati; Giuseppe Rizza; Martina Savoia; Antonella Repetto; Elio Cenci; Antonella Mencacci
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Blood Culture Results Reporting: How Fast Is Your Laboratory and Is Faster Better?

Authors:  Richard B Thomson; Erin McElvania
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Improved blood culture workflow in the time to detection of microorganisms placing incubators systems outside of microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  M Angeles Orellana; Fernando Chaves; Rafael Delgado
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Outer membrane vesicles as molecular biomarkers for Gram-negative sepsis: Taking advantage of nature's perfect packages.

Authors:  Lea Vacca Michel; Thomas Gaborski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.486

5.  The Appropriateness of Empiric Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Joran: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Rama Alkhawaldeh; Rana Abu Farha; Khawla Abu Hammour; Eman Alefishat
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Performance Evaluation of the Quantamatrix QMAC-dRAST System for Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Directly from Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Manon Rosselin; Guy Prod'hom; Gilbert Greub; Antony Croxatto
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-14

7.  The Species Identification and Genomic Analysis of Haemobacillus shengwangii: A Novel Pathogenic Bacterium Isolated From a Critically Ill Patient With Bloodstream Infection.

Authors:  Yingying Du; Xuming Li; Yuhao Liu; Shikui Mu; Dandan Shen; Shu Fan; Zheng Lou; Shouqin Zhang; Han Xia; Yinghua Yuan; Sheng Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Saving Time in Blood Culture Diagnostics: a Prospective Evaluation of the Qvella FAST-PBC Prep Application on the Fast System.

Authors:  Semjon Grinberg; Susanne Schubert; Kristina Hochauf-Stange; Alexander H Dalpke; Marco Narvaez Encalada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 11.677

9.  Effect of Inadequate Empiric Antibacterial Therapy on Hospital Outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-Positive and -Negative US Patients With a Positive Bacterial Culture: A Multicenter Evaluation From March to November 2020.

Authors:  Laura Puzniak; Karri A Bauer; Kalvin C Yu; Pamela Moise; Lyn Finelli; Gang Ye; Carisa De Anda; Latha Vankeepuram; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.835

10.  Direct detection of ESKAPEc pathogens from whole blood using the T2Bacteria Panel allows early antimicrobial stewardship intervention in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Pavel Drevinek; Jakub Hurych; Milena Antuskova; Jan Tkadlec; Jan Berousek; Zuzana Prikrylova; Jiri Bures; Jaromir Vajter; Martin Soucek; Jan Masopust; Vendula Martinkova; Jaroslava Adamkova; Veronika Hysperska; Eliska Bebrova
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.