Literature DB >> 35387489

Saving Time in Blood Culture Diagnostics: a Prospective Evaluation of the Qvella FAST-PBC Prep Application on the Fast System.

Semjon Grinberg1, Susanne Schubert1, Kristina Hochauf-Stange1, Alexander H Dalpke1, Marco Narvaez Encalada1.   

Abstract

Time to results for identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) from blood cultures is an important factor impacting outcome in sepsis. In this study we evaluated a novel device, the FAST™ system from Qvella that concentrates microbial biomass from positive blood culture flasks with the FAST-PBC Prep™ cartridge thereby producing a liquid colony™ (LC), which can be used immediately in standard laboratory downstream applications. We tested 250 positive blood culture bottles collected from January 2021 to May 2021. Results were obtained either with LC or from bacterial overnight cultures using Bruker's MALDI Biotyper™ and bioMérieux's Vitek 2. We compared ID and AST results obtained by both methods and evaluated turnaround times. Two-hundred and fourteen blood cultures could be included in the analysis. In 94% of the cases (n = 201) identification was obtained directly from the LC with concordant results compared to the standard workflow. No discordant results were observed. AST results could be analyzed for 175 samples. Using categorical analysis, concordant agreement was 97.4% of 1,676 AST results for Gram positive bacteria. Agreement for Gram negative bacteria was 98.5% of 980 AST results. Times-to-result were 36.9 h versus 12.8 h for ID and 52.9 h versus 26.8 h for AST in routine workflow vs FASTTM system, respectively. The FASTTM system gives reliable results for ID and AST directly from positive blood cultures and allows for significant time savings in blood culture diagnostics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood culture; diagnostics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35387489      PMCID: PMC9116178          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02533-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   11.677


  22 in total

1.  Inappropriate antibiotic therapy in Gram-negative sepsis increases hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Scott T Micek; Emily C Welch; Joshua A Doherty; Richard M Reichley; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Daniel Roberts; Kenneth E Wood; Bruce Light; Joseph E Parrillo; Satendra Sharma; Robert Suppes; Daniel Feinstein; Sergio Zanotti; Leo Taiberg; David Gurka; Aseem Kumar; Mary Cheang
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Hospital-related cost of sepsis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Habibollah Arefian; Steffen Heublein; André Scherag; Frank Martin Brunkhorst; Mustafa Z Younis; Onnen Moerer; Dagmar Fischer; Michael Hartmann
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.072

5.  Blood Culture Turnaround Time in U.S. Acute Care Hospitals and Implications for Laboratory Process Optimization.

Authors:  Ying P Tabak; Latha Vankeepuram; Gang Ye; Kay Jeffers; Vikas Gupta; Patrick R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Use of polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic tool for neonatal sepsis can result in a decrease in use of antibiotics and total neonatal intensive care unit length of stay.

Authors:  B S Brozanski; J G Jones; M J Krohn; J A Jordan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification.

Authors:  G V Doern; R Vautour; M Gaudet; B Levy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Rapid identification of pathogens in positive blood culture of patients with sepsis: review and meta-analysis of the performance of the sepsityper kit.

Authors:  Nils G Morgenthaler; Markus Kostrzewa
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-27

9.  Multi-drug resistance, inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and mortality in Gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Andrew F Shorr; Scott T Micek; Cristina Vazquez-Guillamet; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Multidrug resistance, inappropriate empiric therapy, and hospital mortality in Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia and sepsis.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Brian H Nathanson; Kate Sulham; Weihong Fan; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  1 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the FAST™ System and the FAST-PBC Prep™ cartridges for speeded-up positive blood culture testing.

Authors:  Alexia Verroken; Chaima Hajji; Florian Bressant; Jonathan Couvreur; Ahalieyah Anantharajah; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.