Literature DB >> 30135160

Sex differences in helping effort reveal the effect of future reproduction on cooperative behaviour in birds.

Philip A Downing1, Ashleigh S Griffin2, Charlie K Cornwallis3.   

Abstract

The evolution of helping behaviour in species that breed cooperatively in family groups is typically attributed to kin selection alone. However, in many species, helpers go on to inherit breeding positions in their natal groups, but the extent to which this contributes to selection for helping is unclear as the future reproductive success of helpers is often unknown. To quantify the role of future reproduction in the evolution of helping, we compared the helping effort of female and male retained offspring across cooperative birds. The kin selected benefits of helping are equivalent between female and male helpers-they are equally related to the younger siblings they help raise-but the future reproductive benefits of helping differ because of sex differences in the likelihood of breeding in the natal group. We found that the sex which is more likely to breed in its natal group invests more in helping, suggesting that in addition to kin selection, helping in family groups is shaped by future reproduction.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  comparative meta-analysis; cooperative breeding; future reproduction; helping effort; kin selection; sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30135160      PMCID: PMC6125912          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

Review 1.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

2.  Grandparent helpers: the adaptive significance of older, postdominant helpers in the Seychelles warbler.

Authors:  David S Richardson; Terry Burke; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Group augmentation and the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Sjouke A Kingma; Peter Santema; Michael Taborsky; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Kinship and Incest Avoidance Drive Patterns of Reproductive Skew in Cooperatively Breeding Birds.

Authors:  Christina Riehl
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints.

Authors:  Ralph Bergmüller; Dik Heg; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Helper contributions in the cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburra: feeding young is no laughing matter.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Evolution and development of sex differences in cooperative behavior in meerkats.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; A F Russell; L L Sharpe; A J Young; Z Balmforth; G M McIlrath
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Nonrelatives inherit colony resources in a primitive termite.

Authors:  Philip M Johns; Kenneth J Howard; Nancy L Breisch; Anahi Rivera; Barbara L Thorne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Negligible senescence in the longest living rodent, the naked mole-rat: insights from a successfully aging species.

Authors:  Rochelle Buffenstein
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Helping in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits: a test of Hamilton's rule.

Authors:  Ben J Hatchwell; Philippa R Gullett; Mark J Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sex differences in helping effort reveal the effect of future reproduction on cooperative behaviour in birds.

Authors:  Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Age- and sex-dependent variation in relatedness corresponds to reproductive skew, territory inheritance, and workload in cooperatively breeding cichlids.

Authors:  Dario Josi; Dik Heg; Tomohiro Takeyama; Danielle Bonfils; Dmitry A Konovalov; Joachim G Frommen; Masanori Kohda; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 3.  Ten recent insights for our understanding of cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Guy A Cooper; Melanie B Ghoul; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Hard-working helpers contribute to long breeder lifespans in cooperative birds.

Authors:  Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.237

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.