Literature DB >> 29166167

Kinship and Incest Avoidance Drive Patterns of Reproductive Skew in Cooperatively Breeding Birds.

Christina Riehl.   

Abstract

Social animals vary in how reproduction is divided among group members, ranging from monopolization by a dominant pair (high skew) to equal sharing by cobreeders (low skew). Despite many theoretical models, the ecological and life-history factors that generate this variation are still debated. Here I analyze data from 83 species of cooperatively breeding birds, finding that kinship within the breeding group is a powerful predictor of reproductive sharing across species. Societies composed of nuclear families have significantly higher skew than those that contain unrelated members, a pattern that holds for both multimale and multifemale groups. Within-species studies confirm this, showing that unrelated subordinates of both sexes are more likely to breed than related subordinates are. Crucially, subordinates in cooperative groups are more likely to breed if they are unrelated to the opposite-sex dominant, whereas relatedness to the same-sex dominant has no effect. This suggests that incest avoidance, rather than suppression by dominant breeders, may be an important proximate mechanism limiting reproduction by subordinates. Overall, these results support the ultimate evolutionary logic behind concessions models of skew-namely, that related subordinates gain indirect fitness benefits from helping at the nests of kin, so a lower direct reproductive share is required for selection to favor helping over dispersal-but not the proximate mechanism of dominant control assumed by these models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dominance; genetic relatedness; inbreeding; kin selection; reproductive bias; social evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29166167     DOI: 10.1086/694411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  3 in total

1.  Sex differences in helping effort reveal the effect of future reproduction on cooperative behaviour in birds.

Authors:  Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cost, risk, and avoidance of inbreeding in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Amy E Leedale; Michelle Simeoni; Stuart P Sharp; Jonathan P Green; Jon Slate; Robert F Lachlan; Elva J H Robinson; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Age- and sex-dependent variation in relatedness corresponds to reproductive skew, territory inheritance, and workload in cooperatively breeding cichlids.

Authors:  Dario Josi; Dik Heg; Tomohiro Takeyama; Danielle Bonfils; Dmitry A Konovalov; Joachim G Frommen; Masanori Kohda; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.171

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.