BACKGROUND: Caloric restriction is known to impair the cardiac function and morphology in hypertrophied hearts of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR); however, the influence of fasting/refeeding (RF) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fasting/refeeding approach on myocardial remodeling and function. In addition, the current study was designed to bring information regarding the mechanisms underlying the participation of Ca2+ handling and b-adrenergic system. METHODS: Sixty-day-old male SHR rats were submitted to food ad libitum (C), 50% food restriction (R50) or RF cycles for 90 days. Cardiac remodeling was assessed by ultrastructure analysis and isolated papillary muscle function. The level of significance considered was 5% (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The RF rats presented lower cardiac atrophy than R50 in relation to C rats. The C rats increased weight gain, R50 maintained their initial body weight and RF rats increased and decreased weight during RF. The RF did not cause functional impairment because the isotonic and isometric parameters showed similar behavior to those of C. The isotonic and isometric cardiac parameters were significantly elevated in RF rats compared to R50 rats. In addition, the R50 rats had cardiac damage in relation to C for isotonic and isometric variables. While the R50 rats showed focal changes in many muscle fibers, the RF rats displayed mild alterations, such as loss or disorganization of myofibrils. CONCLUSION: Fasting/refeeding promotes cardiac beneficial effects and attenuates myocardial injury caused by caloric restriction in SHR rats, contributing to reduce the cardiovascular risk profile and morphological injuries. Furthermore, RF promotes mild improvement in Ca2+ handling and b-adrenergic system.
BACKGROUND: Caloric restriction is known to impair the cardiac function and morphology in hypertrophied hearts of spontaneously hypertensiverats (SHR); however, the influence of fasting/refeeding (RF) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fasting/refeeding approach on myocardial remodeling and function. In addition, the current study was designed to bring information regarding the mechanisms underlying the participation of Ca2+ handling and b-adrenergic system. METHODS: Sixty-day-old male SHR rats were submitted to food ad libitum (C), 50% food restriction (R50) or RF cycles for 90 days. Cardiac remodeling was assessed by ultrastructure analysis and isolated papillary muscle function. The level of significance considered was 5% (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The RFrats presented lower cardiac atrophy than R50 in relation to C rats. The C rats increased weight gain, R50 maintained their initial body weight and RFrats increased and decreased weight during RF. The RF did not cause functional impairment because the isotonic and isometric parameters showed similar behavior to those of C. The isotonic and isometric cardiac parameters were significantly elevated in RFrats compared to R50 rats. In addition, the R50 rats had cardiac damage in relation to C for isotonic and isometric variables. While the R50 rats showed focal changes in many muscle fibers, the RFrats displayed mild alterations, such as loss or disorganization of myofibrils. CONCLUSION: Fasting/refeeding promotes cardiac beneficial effects and attenuates myocardial injury caused by caloric restriction in SHR rats, contributing to reduce the cardiovascular risk profile and morphological injuries. Furthermore, RF promotes mild improvement in Ca2+ handling and b-adrenergic system.
The major causes of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCD)-attributable mortality
are cardiovascular disease, cancers, chronic respiratory disease and
diabetes.[1] These conditions
share a small number of behavioral risk factors, which aggravate the NCD and include
unhealthy diet, which is closely related to hypertension.Caloric restriction (CR) has been recognized throughout history for promoting several
beneficial effects.[2,3] Nevertheless, although CR may
prevent cardiac damage in hypertrophied hearts of spontaneously hypertensiverats
(SHR),[4] it is common to
note body weight fluctuations typically referred to as the "yo-yo
syndrome" while on a regimented diet, and these fluctuations have shown
deleterious cardiovascular effects.[5,6] Researches from our
laboratory and others have shown that, when dietary restriction is severe, it can
promote morphological injuries and impairment of cardiac function in normal or SHR
rats.[7-12]Recently, intermittent fasting or fasting/refeeding has also shown to extend lifespan
and have beneficial health effects as compared to ad libitum food
consumption,[3,13,14] as it enhances cardiovascular function and improves several
risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.[15,16] This dietary
approach also implies a protective effect against oxidative stress, lower rates of
kidney disease,[17] prolongation of
reproductive function,[18] and leads
to the normalization of resting energy expenditure and protein synthesis
recuperation, but can cause many metabolic disturbances.[19,20]In normotensive rats submitted to food restriction, chronic refeeding decreased the
incidence of cardiac arrhythmia and reversed the depletion of heart
proteins.[21,22] Food restriction caused cardiac
function disturbances that were almost completely reversed back to normal after
chronic refeeding in the isolated rat heart.[23] In our laboratory, we observed that fasting/refeeding
cycles reversed the mechanical dysfunction and attenuated the structural injuries in
papillary muscles caused by CR in normotensive rats.[24] Nevertheless, it is not yet clear whether
fasting/refeeding cycles are able to promote similar effects and/or reverse the
cardiac damage induced by food restriction in SHR rats.[7-12] Thus, the
objective was to investigate the fasting/refeeding approach on myocardial remodeling
and function. In addition, the current study was designed to bring information
regarding the mechanisms underlying the participation of Ca2+ handling
and β-adrenergic system. Our hypothesis is that fasting/refeeding condition
would attenuate the myocardial injury caused by food restriction and would
contribute to normal cardiac remodeling in SHR rats without alterations in the
Ca2+ handling and β-adrenergic system.
Methods
Animal model and experimental protocol
Sixty-day-old male SHR were distributed into three groups: control (C, n = 7);
food-restriction (R50, n = 7); and fasting/refeeding cycles (RF, n =
7). The C group was fed Labina rat chow containing 7.0% fat,
20.55% protein, 62.95% carbohydrate, 5.0% fiber and 4.5% moisture (Agribands,
Brazil), and water was provided ad libitum. Table 1 shows the ingredient composition of
Labina rat chow. The R50 group received 50% of
the amount of food consumed by the C group. The RF group was submitted to cycles
of 50% food restriction and refeeding ad libitum weekly. All
rats were maintained on this dietary regimen for 90 days and were then
euthanized.
Table 1
Ingredient composition of the Labina rat experimental diet
Ingredient
(g/kg)
Starch
397.5
Dextrinized Corn Starch
132.0
Sucrose
100.0
Carbohydrates
629.5
Casein
200.0
L-Cysteine
3.0
Choline bitartrate
2.5
Protein
205.5
Soy oil
70.0
Fat
70.0
Fiber
50.0
Vitamin mix
10.0
Mineral mix
35.0
Total
1000
Ingredient composition of the Labina rat experimental dietAll animals were housed in individual cages in a room maintained at 23ºC with a
12-hour light/dark cycle and were weighed once a week. Initial and final body
weights (IBW and FBW, respectively), the ratios between left and right
ventricular weights to final body weight (LVW/FBW and RVW/FBW, respectively) and
papillary muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) were also measured. All experiments
and procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the United States
National Institutes of Health and were approved by the ethics committee of
Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Systolic blood pressure
Systolic blood pressure evaluation was assessed by the non-invasive tail-cuff
method with a Narco BioSystems Electro-Sphygmomanometer (International
Biomedical, Austin, TX, USA) at the beginning and after the end of the
experimental protocol. The average of two pressure readings was recorded for
each animal.
Isolated muscle performance
Cardiac intrinsic contractile performance was evaluated by studying isolated left
ventricular (LV) papillary muscle as described previously.[9,10,12] Isometric
contraction parameters, including peak of developed tension (DT,
g/mm2, defined as peak isometric tension minus resting tension),
resting tension (RT, g/mm2), time to peak tension (TPT, ms), peak
isometric tension development rate (+dT/dt, g/mm2/s) and maximum
tension decline rate (-dT/dt, g/mm2/s), time from peak tension to 50%
relaxation (RT50, ms) were determined. The isotonic parameters were
percentage of shortening (PS, %), time to peak shortening (TPS, ms), maximum
shortening velocity (-dL/dt, ML/s) and maximum relaxation velocity (+dL/dt,
ML/s).The mechanical behavior of the papillary muscle was evaluated under baseline
conditions at 1.25 mM [Ca2+] and after the following inotropic
maneuvers: increase in extracellular Ca2+ concentration from 0.625 to
1.25, 2.5 and 5.2 mM, and β-adrenergic stimulation with 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0
µM isoproterenol. The parameters used to
characterize papillary muscle were as follows: length (mm), weight (mg) and CSA
(mm2). Muscle length (ML) at peak DT was defined as
Lmax in vitro and measured with a Gartner cathetometer (Chicago,
IL, USA). To compare the mechanical function between different muscle lengths,
isometric and isotonic parameters were normalized to CSA and
Lmax.
Morphological study
For the ultrastructural study (three animals per group), small pieces of the LV
papillary muscle were fixed in Karnovsky's fixative in 0.12 M phosphate, pH 7.2,
for 1-2 hours and were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer for 2 hours.[25] After
dehydration in a graded ethanol series, the samples were embedded in epoxy
resin. Ultrathin sections were cut from selected areas with a diamond knife,
double-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined using a
Philips EM 301 electron microscope. The LV myocyte CSA was measured using a
compound microscope attached to a computerized imaging analysis system
(Image-Pro Plus 3.0, Media Cybernetics, Silver Springs, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat 3.5 software (SYSTAT Software
Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Normally distributed variables from general
characteristics and myocardial function at baseline condition were reported as
means ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between groups were
performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for independent samples. A
repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was utilized to evaluate the body weight
evolution and the positive and negative inotropic effects on myocardial
function. When significant differences were found (p < 0.05), post
hoc Tukey's or Bonferroni's test for multiple comparisons was
carried out. The level of significance considered was 5%.The sample size (n) was performed using the equation: n = 1 + [2C *
(s/d)2], where C (z score α + z score
β)2 is dependent on the values chosen for statistical
power of the test (90%; type II error) and level of significance (0.05; type I
error); the standard deviation value (s) adopted was 0.25, and the minimal
difference between groups (d) was 0.5. The sample size needed to detect a
significant difference between groups is 6.25 rats per group; however, we
decided to use 7 animals per group for most of the analyses.
Results
General and morphological characteristics of rats
Significantly higher values of FBW, LVW, RVW, LVW/FBW and RVW/FBW were found in C
compared to R50 and RFrats (Table
2). After 12 weeks, fasting/refeeding cycles promoted a substantial
elevation of FBW and food consumption that were significantly greater than those
in the R50 group. In relation to cardiac parameters, the RF and
R50 groups presented different behavior. Specifically, the LVW
(RF: 12.12% and R50: 48.5%; p < 0.05), RVW (RF: 19.04% and
R50: 47.62%; p < 0.05), LVW/FBW (RF: 6.64% and R50:
19.2%; p < 0.05) and RVW/FBW (RF: 12.06% and R50: 18.96%; p <
0.05) were reduced in percentage in the RF and R50 rats as compared
to C rats. Nevertheless, the fasting/refeeding cycles presented lower cardiac
atrophy than R50 rats in relation to C rats.
Table 2
General characteristics of rats
Parameters
Groups
C
R50
RF
IBW (g)
247 ± 15
248 ± 12
249 ± 13
FBW (g)
366 ± 14
236 ± 17*
342 ± 21*†
FC (g/week)
159 ± 23
77 ± 4*
130 ± 55†
SBP initial (mmHg)
177 ± 8
177 ± 5
181 ± 7
SBP final (mmHg)
163 ± 13
157 ± 15
156 ± 5
LVW (g)
0.99 ± 0.04
0.51 ± 0.01*
0.87 ± 0.08*†
RVW (g)
0.21 ± 0.02
0.11 ± 0.01*
0.17 ± 0.02*†
LVW/FBW (mg/g)
2.71 ± 0.05
2.19 ± 0.16*
2.53 ± 0.08*†
RVW/FBW (mg/g)
0.58 ± 0.04
0.47 ± 0.05*
0.51 ± 0.05*
C: control group; R50: animals with food
restriction of 50%; RF: animals with alternation between food
restriction of 50% and refeeding; IBW: initial body weight; FBW:
final body weight; FC: food consumption; SBP: systolic blood
pressure; LVW: left ventricle weight; RVW: right ventricle
weight. Values are means ± SD (n = 7).
significant at p < 0.05 vs. C; † p <
0.05 vs. R50. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s
test.
General characteristics of ratsC: control group; R50: animals with food
restriction of 50%; RF: animals with alternation between food
restriction of 50% and refeeding; IBW: initial body weight; FBW:
final body weight; FC: food consumption; SBP: systolic blood
pressure; LVW: left ventricle weight; RVW: right ventricle
weight. Values are means ± SD (n = 7).significant at p < 0.05 vs. C; † p <
0.05 vs. R50. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s
test.In addition, C rats experienced increasing weight gain, while R50 rats
maintained their IBW after 12 weeks of experimental protocol (Figure 1). On the other hand, RFrats gained
weight dependent on food intake, with body weight increasing and decreasing
during refeeding and fasting, respectively (Figure
1).
Figure 1
Changes in body weight after 90 days of treatment. Control (C; closed
squares, n = 7), animals with food restriction of 50%
(R50; closed triangles, n = 7) and animals with
alternation between food restriction of 50% and refeeding (RF; open
circles, n = 7). Values are means ± SD; * significant at p
< 0.05, R50vs. C; † p < 0.05, RF
vs. R50; #p < 0.05, C vs. RF. Repeated
measures two-way ANOVA; post hoc Bonferroni's test. Source: Research
team.
Changes in body weight after 90 days of treatment. Control (C; closed
squares, n = 7), animals with food restriction of 50%
(R50; closed triangles, n = 7) and animals with
alternation between food restriction of 50% and refeeding (RF; open
circles, n = 7). Values are means ± SD; * significant at p
< 0.05, R50vs. C; † p < 0.05, RF
vs. R50; #p < 0.05, C vs. RF. Repeated
measures two-way ANOVA; post hoc Bonferroni's test. Source: Research
team.Fasting/refeeding cycles did not cause functional impairment (Tables 3 and 4). Nevertheless, the isotonic [-dL/dt, TPS, and
RT50)] and isometric parameters (TPT, +dT/dt, -dT/dt,
RT50) were significantly elevated in RFrats compared to those in
the R50 group, indicating that fasting/refeeding cycles preserves the
contraction and relaxation phase of cardiac function. Furthermore, the
R50 rats presented cardiac damage in relation to the C group for
isotonic and isometric variables. In addition, the papillary muscle CSA showed
no difference among groups.
Table 3
Isotonic contraction of groups at baseline condition
Groups
C
R50
RF
PS (%)
19 ± 3
18 ± 3
20 ± 2
-dL/dt (ML/s)
1.89 ± 0.40
1.60 ± 0.36
2.19 ± 0.45†
TPS (ms)
168 ± 26
205 ± 14*
161 ± 14†
+dL/dt (ML/s)
4.28 ± 1.26
4.13 ± 1.11
4.79 ± 0.86
RT50 (ms)
58 ± 10
76 ± 12*
53 ± 9†
CSA (mm2)
0.95 ± 0.22
0.85 ± 0.17
0.91 ± 0.18
C: control group; R50: animals with food
restriction of 50%; RF: animals with alternation between food
restriction of 50% and refeeding; PS: percentage of shortening;
-dL/dt: maximum shortening velocity; TPS: time to peak
shortening; + dL/dt: maximum relaxation velocity;
RT50: time from peak tension to 50% relaxation;
CSA - muscle cross-sectional area. Values are means ± SD
(n = 7) at basal calcium concentration (1.25 mM);
significant at p < 0.05 vs. C; † p <
0.05 vs. R50. One‑way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s
test
Table 4
Isometric contraction of groups at baseline condition
Groups
C
R50
RF
DT (g/mm2)
6.17 ± 1.24
6.37 ± 1.14
7.18 ± 1.20
RT (g/mm2)
1.06 ± 0.12
1.12 ± 0.31
1.07 ± 0.17
+dT/dt (g/mm2/s)
77 ± 17
63 ± 13
93 ± 18†
TPT (ms)
146 ± 27
184 ± 19*
128 ± 25†
-dT/dt (g/mm2/s)
29 ± 5
22 ± 4
33 ± 9†
RT50 (ms)
174 ± 40
224 ± 32*
171 ± 21†
CSA (mm2)
0.95 ± 0.22
0.85 ± 0.17
0.91 ± 0.18
C: control group; R50: animals with food
restriction of 50%; RF: animals with alternation between food
restriction of 50% and refeeding; DT: peak developed tension;
RT: resting tension; TPT: time to peak tension; +dT/dt: maximum
tension development rate; -dT/dt: maximum tension decline rate;
RT50: time from peak tension to 50% relaxation;
CSA: muscle cross-sectional area. Values are means ± SD
(n = 7) at basal calcium concentration (1.25 mM);
significant at p < 0.05 vs. C; † p <
0.05 vs. R50. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s
test.
Isotonic contraction of groups at baseline conditionC: control group; R50: animals with food
restriction of 50%; RF: animals with alternation between food
restriction of 50% and refeeding; PS: percentage of shortening;
-dL/dt: maximum shortening velocity; TPS: time to peak
shortening; + dL/dt: maximum relaxation velocity;
RT50: time from peak tension to 50% relaxation;
CSA - muscle cross-sectional area. Values are means ± SD
(n = 7) at basal calcium concentration (1.25 mM);significant at p < 0.05 vs. C; † p <
0.05 vs. R50. One‑way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s
testIsometric contraction of groups at baseline conditionC: control group; R50: animals with food
restriction of 50%; RF: animals with alternation between food
restriction of 50% and refeeding; DT: peak developed tension;
RT: resting tension; TPT: time to peak tension; +dT/dt: maximum
tension development rate; -dT/dt: maximum tension decline rate;
RT50: time from peak tension to 50% relaxation;
CSA: muscle cross-sectional area. Values are means ± SD
(n = 7) at basal calcium concentration (1.25 mM);significant at p < 0.05 vs. C; † p <
0.05 vs. R50. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s
test.
Calcium stimulation
After baseline condition, the increases in extracellular Ca2+
concentrations from 0.625 to 5.2 mM resulted in a positive inotropic effect in
myocytes from all groups (Figures 2A-F). However, the results shown in Figures 2B, C and E indicate that
extracellular Ca2+ (1.25 and 2.5 mM) induced a greater response in
+dT/dt (RF: 99.1 ± 23.6; 132.1 ± 36.2 g/mm2/s
vs. R50: 63.2 ± 12.8; 91.5 ± 22.0
g/mm2/s; p < 0.05, respectively), -dT/dt (RF: 30.6 ±
5.9; 35.9 ± 5.8 g/mm2/s vs. R50:
22.0 ± 4.4; 28.5 ± 6.1 g/mm2/s; p < 0.05,
respectively) and -dL/dt (RF: 2.19 ± 0.45; 2.77 ± 0.51 ML/s
vs. R50: 1.47 ± 0.24; 1.99 ± 0.31
ML/s; p < 0.05, respectively) in the RFrats than in the R50 rats.
In addition, -dT/dt and -dL/dt were significantly diminished in the
R50 myocardium at Ca2+ concentration of 5.2 mM when
compared to those in the RF group. When submitted to inotropic maneuvers, DT, PS
and +dL/dt were similar between RF and R50. In relation to the
cardiac function of C rats after Ca2+ stimulation, the
fasting/refeeding cycles presented similar behavior (Figures 2A-F). The only
significant result between C and R50 was noted in the highest
Ca2+ concentration (5.2 mM); -dL/dt was significantly lower in
R50 than in C group (C: 2.66 ± 0.35 vs.
R50: 2.18 ± 0.33 ML/s, p < 0.05) (Figure 2E).
Figure 2
Effects of increased extracellular calcium on myocardial isotonic and
isometric parameters in papillary muscles from control (C = black
bars), animals with food restriction of 50% (R50 = gray
bars) and animals with alternation between food restriction of 50%
and refeeding (RF = white bars). Extracellular calcium experiment: 7
animals each group. Isometric parameters: A: DT (peak developed
tension normalized per cross-sectional area); B: +dT/dt (peak
isometric tension development rate normalized per cross-sectional
area); C: -dT/dt, g/mm2/s (maximum tension decline rate
normalized per cross-sectional area). Isotonic parameters: D: PS
(percentage of shortening); E: -dL/dT (maximum shortening velocity);
F: +dL/dT (maximum relaxation velocity). Lmax: muscle
length at peak DT. Values are means ± SD; * significant at p
< 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. R50.
Repeated measures two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test. Source:
Research team.
Effects of increased extracellular calcium on myocardial isotonic and
isometric parameters in papillary muscles from control (C = black
bars), animals with food restriction of 50% (R50 = gray
bars) and animals with alternation between food restriction of 50%
and refeeding (RF = white bars). Extracellular calcium experiment: 7
animals each group. Isometric parameters: A: DT (peak developed
tension normalized per cross-sectional area); B: +dT/dt (peak
isometric tension development rate normalized per cross-sectional
area); C: -dT/dt, g/mm2/s (maximum tension decline rate
normalized per cross-sectional area). Isotonic parameters: D: PS
(percentage of shortening); E: -dL/dT (maximum shortening velocity);
F: +dL/dT (maximum relaxation velocity). Lmax: muscle
length at peak DT. Values are means ± SD; * significant at p
< 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. R50.
Repeated measures two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test. Source:
Research team.
Isoproterenol stimulation
The fasting/refeeding cycles increased +dT/dt, -dT/dt and -dL/dt at the highest
isoproterenol concentration (1 µM) compared to those in
the R50 group, indicating a positive inotropic effect in myocytes. In
contrast, the RF group promoted a reduction in +dL/dt than the R50
group at the same isoproterenol concentration (Figure 3F). In addition, the similar effects were noted in +dT/dt
and -dT/dt at 1µM isoproterenol of the C group when
compared to the R50 (Figures 3B
and C). Furthermore, RFrats presented
higher +dL/dt at baseline and isoproterenol concentrations (0.01
µM) in comparison to C group (Figure 3F). There were no significant differences in
mechanical data (DT and PS) under inotropic stimulation with isoproterenol among
the groups (Figures 3A and D).
Figure 3
Effects of isoproterenol stimulation on myocardial function in
papillary muscles from control (C = black bars), animals with food
restriction of 50% (R50 = gray bars) and animals with
alternation between food restriction of 50% and refeeding (RF =
white bars). Isoproterenol stimulation experiment: 7 animals each
group. Isometric parameters: A: DT (peak developed tension
normalized per cross-sectional area); B: +dT/dt (peak isometric
tension development rate normalized per cross-sectional area); C:
-dT/dt, g/mm2/s (maximum tension decline rate normalized
per cross-sectional area). Isotonic parameters: D: PS (percentage of
shortening); E: -dL/dt (maximum shortening velocity at
Lmax); F: +dL/dt (maximum relaxation velocity at
Lmax). Lmax: muscle length at peak DT.
Values are means ± SD; * significant at p < 0.05 vs. C;
† p < 0.05 vs. R50.Repeated
measures two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test. Source: Research
team.
Effects of isoproterenol stimulation on myocardial function in
papillary muscles from control (C = black bars), animals with food
restriction of 50% (R50 = gray bars) and animals with
alternation between food restriction of 50% and refeeding (RF =
white bars). Isoproterenol stimulation experiment: 7 animals each
group. Isometric parameters: A: DT (peak developed tension
normalized per cross-sectional area); B: +dT/dt (peak isometric
tension development rate normalized per cross-sectional area); C:
-dT/dt, g/mm2/s (maximum tension decline rate normalized
per cross-sectional area). Isotonic parameters: D: PS (percentage of
shortening); E: -dL/dt (maximum shortening velocity at
Lmax); F: +dL/dt (maximum relaxation velocity at
Lmax). Lmax: muscle length at peak DT.
Values are means ± SD; * significant at p < 0.05 vs. C;
† p < 0.05 vs. R50.Repeated
measures two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test. Source: Research
team.
Myocardial morphology
The C group rats showed normal morphological characteristics, with myofibrils
filling the entire sarcoplasm, well-defined sarcomeres, mitochondria with
lamellar cristae, sarcoplasmic membranes with regular aspect, sarcoplasmic
reticulum among myofibrils and nuclei with uncondensed chromatin (Figures 4A and B). The R50 group presented focal changes, including
disorganization or absence of myofibrils, some polymorphic mitochondria with a
decreased number of cristae and areas of sarcoplasmic reticulum dilation (Figures 4C, D and E). In RFrats, the only
change observed was a loss of mitochondrial cristae in some organelles. Most of
the fibers had normal morphology (Figures
4F and G).
Figure 4
Ultrastructural study of LV papillary muscle (n = 3 per group).
Photographs A and B correspond to the control group, photographs C,
D and E to the food-restriction (R50) group and
photographs F and G to the refeeding group (RF) group. The control
group showed preserved ultrastructure with normal myofibrils (M),
sarcoplasmic reticulum (arrowhead), mitochondria (mi), nuclear
membrane (N) and plasma membrane (arrow). Food restriction rats
showed cellular changes, including polymorphic mitochondria (*),
myofibril disorganization (**), and infolding of the plasma membrane
(arrow). The papillary muscle during refeeding showed preserved
myofibrils (M), mitochondria (mi), and plasma membranes (arrow),
polymorphic mitochondria (*) and capillary (C). Source: Research
team.
Ultrastructural study of LV papillary muscle (n = 3 per group).
Photographs A and B correspond to the control group, photographs C,
D and E to the food-restriction (R50) group and
photographs F and G to the refeeding group (RF) group. The control
group showed preserved ultrastructure with normal myofibrils (M),
sarcoplasmic reticulum (arrowhead), mitochondria (mi), nuclear
membrane (N) and plasma membrane (arrow). Food restriction rats
showed cellular changes, including polymorphic mitochondria (*),
myofibril disorganization (**), and infolding of the plasma membrane
(arrow). The papillary muscle during refeeding showed preserved
myofibrils (M), mitochondria (mi), and plasma membranes (arrow),
polymorphic mitochondria (*) and capillary (C). Source: Research
team.
Discussion
Interestingly, little information is available on the relationship between cardiac
function and morphology during fasting/refeeding in SHR hypertrophied hearts. Within
this context, this dietary regimen has become the subject of considerable scientific
interest for weight loss and improving cardiometabolic health. Thus, the main
finding of this study was that fasting/refeeding attenuated the damage caused by CR.
The results reveal that fasting/refeeding showed increased isotonic and isometric
parameters at baseline, as well as improved the myocardial inotropic response to
calcium and isoproterenol. In addition, fasting/refeeding prevented cardiac atrophy
and morphological injuries.Less body weight gain was observed in the RF group than in the C group (Table 1, Figure
1), but more body weight gain than in the R50 group. According
to literature, body weight reduces approximately 13% when the animals are submitted
to 48 hours of fasting.[25] This
result appears to be mediated by hormones, such as leptin that acts regulating
appetite and weight gain. A rapid inhibition of ob gene expression
in the white adipose tissue occurs in fasting, and this effect can be reversed by
refeeding.[25,26]Cardiac hypertrophy, a major pathological process involved in cardiac remodeling,
initially serves as a compensatory mechanism to preserve cardiac output.[27] Cardiac remodeling may be regarded
as a first step in the sequence of adaptive responses of the heart to stress caused
by a large number of physiological and pathological conditions, such as changes in
volume and pressure loads and/or metabolic alterations.[28] Current study revealed that fasting/refeeding
induced cardiac atrophy visualized by reduced total heart and left ventricle, as
well as in the LVW/FBW. A decrease in left ventricle weight relative to body weight
is very common in small animals submitted to food restriction[22] and fasting/refeeding.[29] Inhibition of myocardial protein
synthesis and reduction in average protein half-lives are possible explanations for
reduced cardiac mass under starvation.[30] Protein synthesis, an anabolic process, is required for cardiac
hypertrophy. Two major pathways regulating protein synthesis are inhibited by AMPK,
a primary regulator of metabolic pathways, which plays an essential role in a wide
variety of cellular processes to protect against cardiac hypertrophy.[31] Therefore, cardiac atrophy could
be regulated by the common signaling pathway of AMPK in the hypothalamus.In the ultrastructural analysis, food restriction caused focal morphological damage
in most papillary muscle fibers. The same alterations were less intense in the
intermittent refeeding condition. Intermittent refeeding seems to aid in the
attenuation of the mechanisms responsible for this damage and seems to act by
enhancing protein anabolism and retarding protein degradation. Recent findings
suggest that the beneficial effects of refeeding result from a reduction in
oxidative injury and an increase in cellular stress resistance.[2,32] One possible mechanism for our result may be linked to the
expression of atrogin-1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase also known as muscle atrophy F-box
(MAFbx). E3-ligases are part of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway utilized for
protein degradation during muscle atrophy. The literature has shown that
atrogin-1/MAFbx expression results in muscle atrophy during catabolic
condition.[33] In cardiac
muscle, atrogin-1/MAFbx expression increases during heart failure and pressure
overload.[33,34]The isolated papillary muscle analysis showed that food restriction promotes cardiac
dysfunction, but refeeding condition prevents the state. These stimuli provide
evidence that the improvement of myocardial function assigned to fasting/refeeding
cycles was related to changes in intracellular Ca2+ handling, mainly in
the recapture and/or extrusion of cytosolic Ca2+, and β-adrenergic
system. Nevertheless, the lower response of food restricted rats to the increase of
extracellular Ca2+ concentration can be related to changes in the general
mechanisms involved in Ca2+ cycling such as sarcolemmal
Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, sarcolemmal L-type channel,
sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), ryanodine receptor, SR Ca2+ uptake pump, and
the myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity.[35] In relation to RF, this process may be faster and more
balanced, but no study was found to support this statement and show the activity and
protein expression of Ca2+ handling regulatory proteins.Another explanation could be related to the role of cytokine in intermittent fasting
mediated cardioprotection. The influx of inflammatory cells and production of
pro-inflammatory mediators contribute to myocardial injury.[36] Nevertheless, adiponectin can
protect myocardial cells against ischemic injury by activating the cyclic
AMP-dependent protein kinase - Akt pathway, being the latter mediated, in part, by
caloric restriction.[37] Thus, the
beneficial effects of fasting/refeeding may function through anti-inflammatory
cytokine pathways.Few studies have evaluated the β-adrenergic components in experimental models
of fasting/refeeding.[25,35] Some studies have shown that
cardiac function impairment is related to β-adrenergic system
changes,[35] while other
researchers have not reported reduced β-adrenergic response.[25] The literature shows that a
decrease in cardiac β-receptor number has been reported in several
hypertensive models known to be associated with an increase in sympathetic nerve
activity, including SHR.[38] Thus,
the association between increased sympathetic activity and cardiac b-receptor
downregulation is sufficiently close to suggest that the finding of decreased
b-receptor number after starvation and refeeding is indicative of persistently
elevated cardiac sympathetic drive. However, in the current study, there is no
damage of b-system in the RFrats, since the cardiac function was similar to that of
the C group. The present data tend to support the hypothesis that isoproterenol
stimulation reveals that the β-adrenergic system and cAMP phosphorylation of
proteins related to Ca2+ handling were preserved in refeeding rats.Thus, fasting/refeeding cycles have become the subject of considerable scientific
interest as a potential dietary approach for weight-loss and improving
cardiometabolic health. The beneficial effects of the intermittent fasting result
from at least two mechanisms: the oxidative stress and the stress resistance
hypothesis.[39] According to
literature, during the intermittent fasting, there are fewer free radicals produced
in the mitochondria of cells and, therefore, less oxidative damage to the
cells.[39] Another
hypothesis is the resistance to stress that is associated with increased resistance
of cells in many different tissues to injury induced by oxidative, genotoxic and
metabolic insults. The conservation of stress resistance responses to intermittent
fasting across a range of species provides strong evidence that this mechanism
contributes to the lifespan-extending action of dietary restriction.[39]It is worth noting that according to studies in rodents and humans, intermittent food
restriction is capable of promoting weight loss and/or favorably influence an array
of cardiometabolic health indices, with equal or greater efficacy than conventional
continuous energy restriction approaches, such as food restriction.[29] Fasting/refeeding cycles increase
cardiac tolerance to ischemic injury and can affect the development of
cardiovascular disease, preventing postinfarct cardiac remodeling, and impending
chronic heart failure.[29] Comparing
the two dietary approaches, studies show that caloric restriction may exert its
beneficial effects primarily by reducing oxidative stress, whereas RF may act
primarily by a stress resistance mechanism,[40] which can have a cardioprotective effect.
Study limitations
The study did not investigate the activity and protein expression of
Ca2+ handling regulatory proteins known to affect myocardial
contraction and relaxation. In addition, the current study did not evaluate the
involvement of anti-inflammatory cytokines, free-radical production and cellular
stress response, which could help and consolidate the beneficial effects of
intermittent fasting.
Conclusion
We demonstrated that fasting/refeeding promotes cardiac beneficial effects and
attenuates myocardial injury caused by CR in SHR rats, contributing to the reduction
of cardiovascular risk profile and morphological injuries. Furthermore, RF promotes
mild improvement in the Ca2+ handling and β-adrenergic system.
Authors: M Snorek; D Hodyc; V Sedivý; J Durišová; A Skoumalová; J Wilhelm; J Neckář; F Kolář; J Herget Journal: Physiol Res Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 1.881
Authors: Peter Razeghi; Kedryn K Baskin; Saumya Sharma; Martin E Young; Stanislaw Stepkowski; M Faadiel Essop; Heinrich Taegtmeyer Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2006-02-08 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: M F Pinotti; M D P Silva; M M Sugizaki; Y S Diniz; L S Sant'Ana; F F Aragon; C R Padovani; E L B Novelli; A C Cicogna Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: Dirceu S Melo; Liliane V Costa-Pereira; Carina S Santos; Bruno F Mendes; Karine B Costa; Cynthia Fernandes F Santos; Etel Rocha-Vieira; Flávio C Magalhães; Elizabethe A Esteves; Anderson J Ferreira; Sílvia Guatimosim; Marco F Dias-Peixoto Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 4.566