| Literature DB >> 30131483 |
Shufang Liu1, Ying Tian1, Chanchan Zhu2, Xiaoqing Yang3, Qing Sun3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a kind of phosphatase which has been demonstrated to suppress progression of gastric cancer. Many micro-RNAs (miRNAs), such as miR-106b, miR-93, and miR-200c, could inhibit expression of PTEN in cell lines; and many miRNAs including miR-21, miR-22, miR-18a, and miR-222 are related to the progression and prognosis of gastric cancer. However, among these miRNAs, the clinical significance of miR-718 has not yet been elucidated. MATERIAL AND METHODS The expression of PTEN and miR-718 in 141 gastric cancer tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR respectively. The correlation between PTEN, miR-718, and the clinicopathological factors was analyzed by χ² test. The prognostic significance of PTEN and miR-718 was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Luciferase reporter assay was performed to evaluate the regulation of PTEN by miR-718. The effect of miR-718 on gastric cancer proliferation and invasion was investigated by MTT assay and Transwell assay. RESULTS Low expression of PTEN and high expression of miR-718 were both significantly associated with unfavorable prognosis, and both were identified as biomarkers predicting poorer prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Increased miR-718 expression could decrease PTEN expression, thus enhancing phosphatidylinositide 3-kinases/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) signaling. Moreover, the abilities of proliferation and invasion of gastric cells transfected with miR-718 were promoted significantly compared with those transfected with control miRNA. CONCLUSIONS Low expression of PTEN and increased expression of miR-718 in gastric cancer tissues were both independent unfavorable prognostic factors of gastric cancer. Upregulation of miR-718 could increase PI3K/Akt signaling by directly downregulating PTEN, thus promoting the proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30131483 PMCID: PMC6116637 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1The representative images of low expression and high expression of PTEN. (A) The representative image and magnified image for PTEN low expression. The score of staining intensity is 1 and the score of positive cells is 1. Total IHC score is 1 and defined as the low-expression of PTEN. The relative ratio of miR-718 in this case was 2.43. (B) The representative image and magnified image for PTEN high expression. The score of staining intensity is 3 and the score of positive cells is 4. Total IHC score is 12 and defined as the low-expression of PTEN. The relative ratio of miR-718 in this case was 0.83. (C, D). The level of PTEN mRNA (C) and miR-718 (D) in the 12 pairs of fresh gastric cancers and their adjacent tissues was detected with qRT-PCR. The PTEN mRNA in adjacent tissues was significantly higher compared gastric cancers, while miR-718 level in adjacent tissues was remarkably lower than gastric cancers.
Correlations between clinicopathologic factors and PTEN or miR-718.
| Characters | PTEN | P | miR-718 | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Low (52) | High (89) | Low (80) | High (61) | |||
| Sex | |||||||
| Male | 102 | 37 | 65 | 0.847 | 61 | 41 | 0.258 |
| Female | 39 | 15 | 24 | 19 | 20 | ||
| Age | |||||||
| <60 | 59 | 24 | 35 | 0.481 | 30 | 29 | 0.301 |
| ≥60 | 82 | 28 | 54 | 50 | 32 | ||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | |||||||
| ≤5 | 62 | 24 | 38 | 0.727 | 32 | 30 | 0.307 |
| >5 | 79 | 28 | 51 | 48 | 31 | ||
| Differentiation | |||||||
| Well+moderate | 78 | 33 | 45 | 0.162 | 41 | 37 | 0.307 |
| Poor | 63 | 19 | 44 | 39 | 24 | ||
| Tumor invasion | |||||||
| T1+T2 | 37 | 10 | 27 | 0.169 | 25 | 12 | 0.176 |
| T3+T4 | 104 | 42 | 62 | 55 | 49 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | |||||||
| No (N0) | 54 | 20 | 34 | 1.000 | 36 | 18 | 0.080 |
| Yes (N1/2/3) | 87 | 32 | 55 | 44 | 43 | ||
| Distant metastasis | |||||||
| M0 | 130 | 49 | 81 | 0.746 | 72 | 58 | 0.350 |
| M1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 3 | ||
| TNM stage | |||||||
| I–II | 64 | 22 | 42 | 0.603 | 37 | 27 | 0.865 |
| III–IV | 77 | 30 | 47 | 43 | 34 | ||
| PTEN | |||||||
| Low | 52 | 21 | 31 | 0.005 | |||
| High | 89 | 59 | 30 | ||||
| miR-718 | |||||||
| Low | 80 | 21 | 59 | 0.005 | |||
| High | 61 | 31 | 30 | ||||
Means calculated by χ2 test.
PTEN – phosphatase and tensin homolog.
Univariate analysis.
| Characters | 5-year survival rate | P |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 47.4 | 0.129 |
| Female | 50.1 | |
| Age | ||
| <60 | 43.9 | 0.856 |
| ≥60 | 52.6 | |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | ||
| ≤5 | 41.0 | 0.208 |
| >5 | 58.6 | |
| Tumor invasion | ||
| T1+T2 | 79.0 | |
| T3+T4 | 38.6 | |
| N stage | ||
| No (N0) | 59.0 | |
| Yes (N1/2/3) | 35.3 | |
| Distant metastasis | ||
| M0 | 50.2 | |
| M1 | 36.4 | |
| TNM stage | ||
| I–II | 54.5 | |
| III–IV | 41.2 | |
| Differentiation | ||
| Well+moderate | 54.1 | |
| Poor | 42.2 | |
| PTEN | ||
| Low | 34.0 | |
| High | 59.5 | |
| miR-718 | ||
| Low | 65.5 | |
| High | 27.3 | |
Means calculated by log-rank test.
PTEN – phosphatase and tensin homolog.
Figure 2The survival curves of clinicopathological factors, PTEN and miR-718. (A) The survival curves of group T1+T2 and group T3+T4. (B) The survival curves of group N0 and group N1/2/3. (C) The survival curves of group M0 and group M1. (D) The survival curves of group TNM I+II and group TNM III+IV. (E). The survival curves of poor differentiation and good/moderate differentiation. (F) The survival curves of high-expression and low-expression of PTEN. (G) The survival curves of high level and low level of miR-718.
Multivariate analysis.
| Characters | HR | 95%CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor invasion | |||
| T1+T2 | 1 | ||
| T3+T4 | 2.79 | 1.23–6.32 | |
| Lymph node invasion | |||
| No (N0) | 1 | ||
| Yes (N1/2/3) | 1.94 | 1.06–3.55 | |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| M0 | 1 | ||
| M1 | 5.18 | 2.04–13.14 | |
| Differentiation | |||
| Well+Moderate | 1 | ||
| Poor | 3.38 | 1.80–6.37 | |
| PTEN | |||
| Low | 1 | ||
| High | 0.41 | 0.22–0.75 | |
| miR-718 | |||
| Low | 1 | ||
| High | 2.13 | 1.14–3.99 | |
Means calculated by Cox-regression model.
PTEN – phosphatase and tensin homolog.
Figure 3miR-718 could activate PI3K/Akt signaling by targeting PTEN. (A) The transcription of PTEN in gastric cell line was suppressed by miR-718. The normalized firefly luciferase activity of PTEN was detected 48 hours after the transfection with the PTEN-3′UTR-Luc reporter construct with the absence of miR-718 expression vector or the scrambled control miRNA vector in gastric cancer cell MKN7. Data were from 3 independent experiments and displayed by the mean ±SEM. (B) PI3K/Akt signaling in MKN7 could be activated by miR-718. The effect of miR-718 on Akt signaling of MKN7 cells was evaluated by western blotting. EGF at 100 ng/mL was used to incubate the cells for 10 minutes, 48 hours after transfection of expression vector of miR-718 or scrambled control miRNA. Cells were then lysed, and western blotting was performed to detect the levels of PTEN, phosphor-Ser473-Akt, total Akt, and β-actin. (C) miR-718 could accelerate the proliferation of MKN7. The MTT assay was used to detect the proliferation index of MKN7 48 hours after transfection of expression vector of miR-718 or scrambled control miRNA. Data were from 3 independent experiments and displayed by the mean ±SEM. (D) miR-718 could enhance the invasion of MKN7; 48 hours after transfection of expression vector of miR-718 or scrambled control miRNA, MKN7 was seeded into the Matrigel-precoated chamber and incubated for 24 hours with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 ng/mL EGF as a chemoattractant. Cells at the bottom compartment were fixed and stained with crystal violet. Invaded cells were counted in at least 8 random visual fields. Data were from 3 independent experiments and displayed by the mean ±SEM. (E) Representative images of invaded cells in D. Image 1, 2, 3, 4 represent the groups with/without EGF stimulation or with/without miR-718 transfection.
Basic information of the retrospective cohort and prospective cohort.
| Characters | Retrospective cohort | Prospective cohort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 102 | 72.3% | 9 | 75.0% |
| Female | 39 | 27.7% | 3 | 25.0% |
| Age | ||||
| <60 | 59 | 41.8% | 3 | 25.0% |
| ≥60 | 82 | 58.2% | 9 | 75.0% |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | ||||
| ≤5 | 62 | 44.0% | 5 | 41.7% |
| >5 | 79 | 56.0% | 7 | 58.3% |
| Differentiation | ||||
| Poor | 78 | 55.3% | 6 | 50.0% |
| Well+moderate | 63 | 44.7% | 6 | 50.0% |
| Tumor invasion | ||||
| T1+T2 | 37 | 26.2% | 5 | 41.7% |
| T3+T4 | 104 | 73.8% | 7 | 58.3% |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| No (N0) | 54 | 38.3% | 6 | 50.0% |
| Yes (N1/2/3) | 87 | 61.7% | 6 | 50.0% |
| Distant metastasis | ||||
| M0 | 130 | 92.2% | 11 | 91.7% |
| M1 | 11 | 7.8% | 1 | 8.3% |
| TNM stage | ||||
| I–II | 64 | 45.4% | 5 | 41.7% |
| III–IV | 77 | 54.6% | 7 | 58.3% |