| Literature DB >> 28212532 |
Rupeng Zhang1,2,3, Yuenan Guo1,2,3, Zhenchi Ma1,2,3, Gang Ma4,2,3, Qiang Xue1,2,3, Fangxuan Li5,2,3, Liren Liu4,2,3.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) play an important role in the regulation of gene expression, and participate in a wide range of biological processes, including carcinogenesis. Long non-coding RNA PTENP1, the pseudogene of PTEN tumor suppressor, has been reported to exert its tumor suppressive function via modulation of PTEN expression in many malignancies. However, whether a PTENP1~miRNA~PTEN ceRNA network exists and how it functions in gastric cancer (GC) remains elusive. In order to identify and characterize the PTENP1~miRNA~PTEN ceRNA network in GC, we first determined PTENP1 levels in clinical GC samples and found that PTENP1 and PTEN were concurrently downregulated in these samples. We further demonstrated that PTENP1 could act as a ceRNA to sponge miR-106b and miR-93 from targeting PTEN for downregulation using a novel ceRNA in vitro gradient assay. Thus, we revealed a tumor suppressive role of PTENP1 as ceRNA in GC and pinpointed the specific miRNAs decoyed by PTENP1, highlighting the emerging roles of ceRNAs in the biological regulation of GC cells and their possible clinical significance.Entities:
Keywords: PTENP1; gastric cancer; long non-coding RNA; miR-106b; miR-93
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28212532 PMCID: PMC5432239 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1PTEN and PTENP1 were concurrently downregulated in GC
(A–B) PTENP1 and PTEN mRNA levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR in paired GC samples. Data are presented as 2−ΔΔCT. (C–D) PTEN protein was determined by western blot. Each assay was done in triplicate. P values were obtained by paired t-test (**P < 0.01). (E) The relationship between PTEN and PTENP1 mRNA were analyzed by linear regression analysis. Data are presented as In 2−ΔΔCT.
PTENP1 and PTEN expression levels were associated with the pathological features of GC patients
| Factors | Case | PTENP1 (mean) | PTEN (mean) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.489 | 0.401 | |||
| Male | 23 | 2.962 ± 1.49 | 1.662 ± 0.37 | ||
| Female | 13 | 3.351 ± 1.79 | 1.772 ± 0.37 | ||
| Age(years) | 0.360 | 0.079 | |||
| < 60 | 22 | 3.299 ± 1.64 | 1.788 ± 0.37 | ||
| ≥ 60 | 14 | 2.793 ± 1.51 | 1.566 ± 0.34 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.031 | 0.027 | |||
| ≥ 5 | 26 | 2.262 ± 0.92 | 1.619 ± 0.27 | ||
| < 5 | 10 | 5.108 ± 1.10 | 1.918 ± 0.50 | ||
| Histological grade | 0.549 | 0.452 | |||
| Well-intermediately differentiation | 15 | 2.911 ± 1.55 | 1.646 ± 0.33 | ||
| Poor differentiation | 21 | 3.239 ± 1.64 | 1.741 ± 0.40 | ||
| Invasion depth | 0.001 | 0.008 | |||
| T1–T2 | 6 | 5.032 ± 1.92 | 2.057 ± 0.32 | ||
| T3–T4 | 30 | 2.716 ± 1.22 | 1.631 ± 0.34 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.032 | 0.018 | |||
| N0 | 7 | 4.784 ± 1.98 | 1.993 ± 0.41 | ||
| N1–N3 | 29 | 2.696 ± 1.20 | 1.631 ± 0.33 | ||
| Distant metastasis | 0.478 | 0.656 | |||
| M0 | 4 | 2.560 ± 1.17 | 1.623 ± 0.22 | ||
| M1 | 32 | 3.170 ± 1.64 | 1.712 ± 0.39 | ||
| TNM stage | 0.025 | 0.002 | |||
| I, II | 8 | 4.695 ± 2.04 | 2.046 ± 0.35 | ||
| III, IV | 28 | 2.647 ± 1.11 | 1.603 ± 0.31 |
Figure 2PTENP1 upregulated PTEN expression in GC cells
(A) PTENP1 expression level in GC cells were analyzed by qRT-PCR compared to GES-1. (B) Lentiviral mediated expression of PTENP1 was validated by qRT-PCR in GC cells. (C–D) PTEN mRNA (C) and protein level (D) were determined after overexpression of PTENP1 in MGC803 and BGC823 cells by qRT-PCR and western blot, respectively. P values were obtained by paired t-test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 3PTENP1 inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis
(A–B) Cell proliferation in response to overexpression of PTENPI was evaluated at different time points by MTT assay in GC cells. (C) The transfected cells were harvested and stained with Annexin-V-FITC/PI to examine apoptosis by flow cytometry. (D–E) The percentages of apoptotic cells were defined as early apoptosis (Q4) + late apoptosis (Q2).
Figure 4Overexpression of PTENP1 inhibited migratory and invasive ability of MGC803 and BGC823 cells
(A–B) Representative photographs of cells passing through the membranes with Matrigel-coated or uncoated were taken at 200× magnification. (C–D) Migrated and invaded cells were quantified by counting in 10 random fields at 200× magnification. P values were obtained by paired t-test (***P < 0.001).
Figure 5PTENP1 modulated PTEN level by competitively binding to miR-106b/miR-93
(A–B) The sequences of PTENP1 3′UTR, miR-106b/miR-93, and mutant PTENP1 3′UTR were shown. (C–D) pIS0-PTENP1 or pIS0-mutPTENP1 were co-transfected into MGC803 and BGC823 cells with miR-106b mimics, miR-93 mimics or negative control (NC). Luciferase signals were then detected after 24 hours. (E–F) Either miR-10b6 or miR-93 was co-transfected with consecutive increased doses of pCDH-PTENP1 (250 ng, 500 ng, 1000 ng, 1500 ng and 2000 ng) and pCDH-mutPTENP1 (250 ng, 500 ng, 1000 ng, 1500 ng and 2000 ng) into MGC803 (E) and BGC823 (F) cells, respectively. Then PTEN mRNA levels corresponding to different doses of pCDH-PTENP1 and pCDH-mutPTENP1were evaluated by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as 2−ΔΔCT.
Figure 6Correlation analysis of miR-106b/miR-93 and PTENP1/PTEN expression in GC
(A–B) The levels of miR-106b and miR-93 in 36 GC samples relative to the paired normal controls were evaluated by qRT-PCR in paired GC samples. Data are presented as 2−ΔΔCT. (C–D) Correlation analysis of miR-106b/miR-93 and PTENP1 expression using Pearson's test. Data are presented as 2−ΔΔCT. (E–F) Correlation analysis of miR-106b/miR-93 and PTEN expression using Pearson's test. Data are presented as 2−ΔΔCT.