Ramon Casanova1, Ryan T Barnard2, Sarah A Gaussoin2, Santiago Saldana2, Kathleen M Hayden3, JoAnn E Manson4, Robert B Wallace5, Stephen R Rapp3, Susan M Resnick6, Mark A Espeland2, Jiu-Chiuan Chen7. 1. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: casanova@wakehealth.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 3. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA. 6. Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute of Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The main goal of this work is to investigate the feasibility of estimating an anatomical index that can be used as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk factor in the Women's Health Initiative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (WHIMS-MRI) using MRI data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), a well-characterized imaging database of AD patients and cognitively normal subjects. We called this index AD Pattern Similarity (AD-PS) scores. To demonstrate the construct validity of the scores, we investigated their associations with several AD risk factors. The ADNI and WHIMS imaging databases were collected with different goals, populations and data acquisition protocols: it is important to demonstrate that the approach to estimating AD-PS scores can bridge these differences. METHODS: MRI data from both studies were processed using high-dimensional warping methods. High-dimensional classifiers were then estimated using the ADNI MRI data. Next, the classifiers were applied to baseline and follow-up WHIMS-MRI GM data to generate the GM AD-PS scores. To study the validity of the scores we investigated associations between GM AD-PS scores at baseline (Scan 1) and their longitudinal changes (Scan 2 -Scan 1) with: 1) age, cognitive scores, white matter small vessel ischemic disease (WM SVID) volume at baseline and 2) age, cognitive scores, WM SVID volume longitudinal changes respectively. In addition, we investigated their associations with time until classification of independently adjudicated status in WHIMS-MRI. RESULTS: Higher GM AD-PS scores from WHIMS-MRI baseline data were associated with older age, lower cognitive scores, and higher WM SVID volume. Longitudinal changes in GM AD-PS scores (Scan 2 - Scan 1) were also associated with age and changes in WM SVID volumes and cognitive test scores. Increases in the GM AD-PS scores predicted decreases in cognitive scores and increases in WM SVID volume. GM AD-PS scores and their longitudinal changes also were associated with time until classification of cognitive impairment. Finally, receiver operating characteristic curves showed that baseline GM AD-PS scores of cognitively normal participants carried information about future cognitive status determined during follow-up. DISCUSSION: We applied a high-dimensional machine learning approach to estimate a novel AD risk factor for WHIMS-MRI study participants using ADNI data. The GM AD-PS scores showed strong associations with incident cognitive impairment and cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with age, cognitive function, cognitive status and WM SVID volume lending support to the ongoing validation of the GM AD-PS score.
INTRODUCTION: The main goal of this work is to investigate the feasibility of estimating an anatomical index that can be used as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk factor in the Women's Health Initiative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (WHIMS-MRI) using MRI data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), a well-characterized imaging database of ADpatients and cognitively normal subjects. We called this index AD Pattern Similarity (AD-PS) scores. To demonstrate the construct validity of the scores, we investigated their associations with several AD risk factors. The ADNI and WHIMS imaging databases were collected with different goals, populations and data acquisition protocols: it is important to demonstrate that the approach to estimating AD-PS scores can bridge these differences. METHODS: MRI data from both studies were processed using high-dimensional warping methods. High-dimensional classifiers were then estimated using the ADNI MRI data. Next, the classifiers were applied to baseline and follow-up WHIMS-MRI GM data to generate the GMAD-PS scores. To study the validity of the scores we investigated associations between GMAD-PS scores at baseline (Scan 1) and their longitudinal changes (Scan 2 -Scan 1) with: 1) age, cognitive scores, white matter small vessel ischemic disease (WM SVID) volume at baseline and 2) age, cognitive scores, WM SVID volume longitudinal changes respectively. In addition, we investigated their associations with time until classification of independently adjudicated status in WHIMS-MRI. RESULTS: Higher GMAD-PS scores from WHIMS-MRI baseline data were associated with older age, lower cognitive scores, and higher WM SVID volume. Longitudinal changes in GMAD-PS scores (Scan 2 - Scan 1) were also associated with age and changes in WM SVID volumes and cognitive test scores. Increases in the GMAD-PS scores predicted decreases in cognitive scores and increases in WM SVID volume. GMAD-PS scores and their longitudinal changes also were associated with time until classification of cognitive impairment. Finally, receiver operating characteristic curves showed that baseline GMAD-PS scores of cognitively normal participants carried information about future cognitive status determined during follow-up. DISCUSSION: We applied a high-dimensional machine learning approach to estimate a novel AD risk factor for WHIMS-MRI study participants using ADNI data. The GMAD-PS scores showed strong associations with incident cognitive impairment and cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with age, cognitive function, cognitive status and WM SVID volume lending support to the ongoing validation of the GMAD-PS score.
Authors: Keelin Murphy; Bram van Ginneken; Joseph M Reinhardt; Sven Kabus; Kai Ding; Xiang Deng; Kunlin Cao; Kaifang Du; Gary E Christensen; Vincent Garcia; Tom Vercauteren; Nicholas Ayache; Olivier Commowick; Grégoire Malandain; Ben Glocker; Nikos Paragios; Nassir Navab; Vladlena Gorbunova; Jon Sporring; Marleen de Bruijne; Xiao Han; Mattias P Heinrich; Julia A Schnabel; Mark Jenkinson; Cristian Lorenz; Marc Modat; Jamie R McClelland; Sébastien Ourselin; Sascha E A Muenzing; Max A Viergever; Dante De Nigris; D Louis Collins; Tal Arbel; Marta Peroni; Rui Li; Gregory C Sharp; Alexander Schmidt-Richberg; Jan Ehrhardt; René Werner; Dirk Smeets; Dirk Loeckx; Gang Song; Nicholas Tustison; Brian Avants; James C Gee; Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Berend C Stoel; Martin Urschler; Manuel Werlberger; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Simon Rit; David Sarrut; Josien P W Pluim Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Sarah A Jaramillo; Deborah Felton; Leeann Andrews; Lisa Desiderio; Rose K Hallarn; Sharon D Jackson; Laura H Coker; Jennifer G Robinson; Judith K Ockene; Mark A Espeland Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Christopher T Whitlow; Benjamin Wagner; Jeff Williamson; Sally A Shumaker; Joseph A Maldjian; Mark A Espeland Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Jon B Toledo; Michael W Weiner; David A Wolk; Xiao Da; Kewei Chen; Steven E Arnold; William Jagust; Clifford Jack; Eric M Reiman; Christos Davatzikos; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: Stefan Klöppel; Cynthia M Stonnington; Carlton Chu; Bogdan Draganski; Rachael I Scahill; Jonathan D Rohrer; Nick C Fox; Clifford R Jack; John Ashburner; Richard S J Frackowiak Journal: Brain Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jon B Toledo; Xiao Da; Priyanka Bhatt; David A Wolk; Steven E Arnold; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Christos Davatzikos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Habes; D Janowitz; G Erus; J B Toledo; S M Resnick; J Doshi; S Van der Auwera; K Wittfeld; K Hegenscheid; N Hosten; R Biffar; G Homuth; H Völzke; H J Grabe; W Hoffmann; C Davatzikos Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: U Rajendra Acharya; Steven Lawrence Fernandes; Joel En WeiKoh; Edward J Ciaccio; Mohd Kamil Mohd Fabell; U John Tanik; V Rajinikanth; Chai Hong Yeong Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Lucas Arbabyazd; Kelly Shen; Zheng Wang; Martin Hofmann-Apitius; Petra Ritter; Anthony R McIntosh; Demian Battaglia; Viktor Jirsa Journal: eNeuro Date: 2021-07-06
Authors: Diana Younan; Andrew J Petkus; Keith F Widaman; Xinhui Wang; Ramon Casanova; Mark A Espeland; Margaret Gatz; Victor W Henderson; JoAnn E Manson; Stephen R Rapp; Bonnie C Sachs; Marc L Serre; Sarah A Gaussoin; Ryan Barnard; Santiago Saldana; William Vizuete; Daniel P Beavers; Joel A Salinas; Helena C Chui; Susan M Resnick; Sally A Shumaker; Jiu-Chiuan Chen Journal: Brain Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Michelle R Caunca; Lily Wang; Ying Kuen Cheung; Noam Alperin; Sang H Lee; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Clinton B Wright; Tatjana Rundek Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 3.224
Authors: S Ali Naqvi; Graham C Thompson; Ari R Joffe; Jaime Blackwood; Dori-Ann Martin; Mary Brindle; Herman W Barkema; Craig N Jenne Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: Diana Younan; Xinhui Wang; Ramon Casanova; Ryan Barnard; Sarah A Gaussoin; Santiago Saldana; Andrew J Petkus; Daniel P Beavers; Susan M Resnick; JoAnn E Manson; Marc L Serre; William Vizuete; Victor W Henderson; Bonnie C Sachs; Joel A Salinas; Margaret Gatz; Mark A Espeland; Helena C Chui; Sally A Shumaker; Stephen R Rapp; Jiu-Chiuan Chen Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Fang-Chi Hsu; Ryan T Barnard; Andrea M Anderson; Rajesh Talluri; Christopher T Whitlow; Timothy M Hughes; Michael Griswold; Kathleen M Hayden; Rebecca F Gottesman; Lynne E Wagenknecht Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 16.655