Hannah J Kimmel1, Yanick N Brice1,2, Thomas A Trikalinos1,2, Indra Neil Sarkar2,3, Megan L Ranney2,4. 1. 1 Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. 2 Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. 3 Center for Biomedical Informatics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 4. 4 Emergency Digital Health Innovation Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Abstract
Background: To systematically review evidence on the feasibility and efficacy of real-time electronic notifications about patients at high risk of emergency department (ED) recidivism. Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched for empirical studies of real-time ED-based electronic tools, identifying adult patients at high risk of frequent utilization. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Qualitative data synthesis and assessment of strength of evidence were conducted through consensus discussion. Results: Of 2,256 records found through the search, 210 were duplicates, 2,004 were excluded based on abstract review, and 31 were excluded after full text review. The final sample consisted of 10 studies described in 11 articles describing the effect of real-time ED-based electronic notifications for high-risk patients. Three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All notifications were based on prespecified markers of risk. Seven studies integrated complex care plans into the electronic health record. Effect on ED use and length of stay (LOS) was mixed: nine studies reported decreased ED use, although results were statistically significant in only three studies; for LOS, one study reported a statistically significant reduction. Impact on cost and financial metrics was promising, with three (of three studies reporting this metric) showing improved organizational financial metrics. Three RCTs reported a reduction in opioid prescriptions. Conclusions: Real-time electronic notifications of ED providers regarding patients at high risk of ED recidivism are feasible. They may help reduce resource utilization and costs. Large knowledge gaps remain regarding patient- and provider-centered outcomes.
Background: To systematically review evidence on the feasibility and efficacy of real-time electronic notifications about patients at high risk of emergency department (ED) recidivism. Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched for empirical studies of real-time ED-based electronic tools, identifying adult patients at high risk of frequent utilization. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Qualitative data synthesis and assessment of strength of evidence were conducted through consensus discussion. Results: Of 2,256 records found through the search, 210 were duplicates, 2,004 were excluded based on abstract review, and 31 were excluded after full text review. The final sample consisted of 10 studies described in 11 articles describing the effect of real-time ED-based electronic notifications for high-risk patients. Three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All notifications were based on prespecified markers of risk. Seven studies integrated complex care plans into the electronic health record. Effect on ED use and length of stay (LOS) was mixed: nine studies reported decreased ED use, although results were statistically significant in only three studies; for LOS, one study reported a statistically significant reduction. Impact on cost and financial metrics was promising, with three (of three studies reporting this metric) showing improved organizational financial metrics. Three RCTs reported a reduction in opioid prescriptions. Conclusions: Real-time electronic notifications of ED providers regarding patients at high risk of ED recidivism are feasible. They may help reduce resource utilization and costs. Large knowledge gaps remain regarding patient- and provider-centered outcomes.
Authors: Philip Zazove; Michael McKee; Lauren Schleicher; Lee Green; Paul Kileny; Mary Rapai; Elie Mulhem Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Darin Neven; Leonard Paulozzi; Donelle Howell; Sterling McPherson; Sean M Murphy; Becky Grohs; Linda Marsh; Crystal Lederhos; John Roll Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2016-09-10 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Richard Gentry Wilkerson; Hong K Kim; Thomas Andrew Windsor; Darren P Mareiniss Journal: Emerg Med Clin North Am Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Lauren K Whiteside; Marie C Vrablik; Joan Russo; Eileen M Bulger; Deepika Nehra; Kathleen Moloney; Douglas F Zatzick Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-01-28