Literature DB >> 23304321

A clinical decision tool for predicting patient care characteristics: patients returning within 72 hours in the emergency department.

Eva K Lee1, Fan Yuan, Daniel A Hirsh, Michael D Mallory, Harold K Simon.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to develop a clinical tool capable of identifying discriminatory characteristics that can predict patients who will return within 72 hours to the Pediatric emergency department (PED). We studied 66,861 patients who were discharged from the EDs during the period from May 1 2009 to December 31 2009. We used a classification model to predict return visits based on factors extracted from patient demographic information, chief complaint, diagnosis, treatment, and hospital real-time ED statistics census. We began with a large pool of potentially important factors, and used particle swarm optimization techniques for feature selection coupled with an optimization-based discriminant analysis model (DAMIP) to identify a classification rule with relatively small subsets of discriminatory factors that can be used to predict - with 80% accuracy or greater - return within 72 hours. The analysis involves using a subset of the patient cohort for training and establishment of the predictive rule, and blind predicting the return of the remaining patients. Good candidate factors for revisit prediction are obtained where the accuracy of cross validation and blind prediction are over 80%. Among the predictive rules, the most frequent discriminatory factors identified include diagnosis (> 97%), patient complaint (>97%), and provider type (> 57%). There are significant differences in the readmission characteristics among different acuity levels. For Level 1 patients, critical readmission factors include patient complaint (>57%), time when the patient arrived until he/she got an ED bed (> 64%), and type/number of providers (>50%). For Level 4/5 patients, physician diagnosis (100%), patient complaint (99%), disposition type when patient arrives and leaves the ED (>30%), and if patient has lab test (>33%) appear to be significant. The model was demonstrated to be consistent and predictive across multiple PED sites.The resulting tool could enable ED staff and administrators to use patient specific values for each of a small number of discriminatory factors, and in return receive a prediction as to whether the patient will return to the ED within 72 hours. Our prediction accuracy can be as high as over 85%. This provides an opportunity for improving care and offering additional care or guidance to reduce ED readmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23304321      PMCID: PMC3540516     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  23 in total

1.  Return to the emergency department among elders: patterns and predictors.

Authors:  J McCusker; S Cardin; F Bellavance; E Belzile
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 2.  Application of data mining techniques to healthcare data.

Authors:  Mary K Obenshain
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Analysis of patient revisits to the emergency department.

Authors:  S C Hu
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  "Bounces": an analysis of short-term return visits to a public hospital emergency department.

Authors:  J M Pierce; A L Kellerman; C Oster
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Uniqueness of medical data mining.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Cios; G William Moore
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  An analysis of unscheduled return visits to an urban emergency department.

Authors:  A M Kelly; A M Chirnside; C H Curry
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1993-08-11

8.  Return visits to a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Evaline A Alessandrini; Jane M Lavelle; Stephanie M Grenfell; Cynthia R Jacobstein; Kathy N Shaw
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.454

9.  Return visits to the emergency department.

Authors:  B Lerman; M S Kobernick
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Emergency department revisits.

Authors:  K D Keith; J J Bocka; M S Kobernick; R L Krome; M A Ross
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  15 in total

1.  Investigating a Needle-Based Epidural Procedure in Obstetric Anesthesia.

Authors:  Eva K Lee; Haozheng Tian; Jinha Lee; Xin Wie; John Neeld; K Doug Smith; Alan R Kaplan
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Real-Time Emergency Department Electronic Notifications Regarding High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hannah J Kimmel; Yanick N Brice; Thomas A Trikalinos; Indra Neil Sarkar; Megan L Ranney
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision and genomic medicine.

Authors:  Sameer Quazi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Machine learning versus traditional methods for the development of risk stratification scores: a case study using original Canadian Syncope Risk Score data.

Authors:  Lars Grant; Pil Joo; Marie-Joe Nemnom; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 5.472

5.  Priority queuing models for hospital intensive care units and impacts to severe case patients.

Authors:  Matthew S Hagen; Jeffrey K Jopling; Timothy G Buchman; Eva K Lee
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 6.  Rationale and methodology of a collaborative learning project in congenital cardiac care.

Authors:  Michael J Wolf; Eva K Lee; Susan C Nicolson; Gail D Pearson; Madolin K Witte; Jeryl Huckaby; Michael Gaies; Lara S Shekerdemian; William T Mahle
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Return Visit Admissions May Not Indicate Quality of Emergency Department Care for Children.

Authors:  Marion R Sills; Michelle L Macy; Keith E Kocher; Amber K Sabbatini
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Higher Quality and Lower Cost from Improving Hospital Discharge Decision Making.

Authors:  James C Cox; Vjollca Sadiraj; Kurt E Schnier; John F Sweeney
Journal:  J Econ Behav Organ       Date:  2015-04-03

Review 9.  A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records.

Authors:  Chaitanya Shivade; Preethi Raghavan; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Peter J Embi; Noemie Elhadad; Stephen B Johnson; Albert M Lai
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Risk prediction of emergency department revisit 30 days post discharge: a prospective study.

Authors:  Shiying Hao; Bo Jin; Andrew Young Shin; Yifan Zhao; Chunqing Zhu; Zhen Li; Zhongkai Hu; Changlin Fu; Jun Ji; Yong Wang; Yingzhen Zhao; Dorothy Dai; Devore S Culver; Shaun T Alfreds; Todd Rogow; Frank Stearns; Karl G Sylvester; Eric Widen; Xuefeng B Ling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.