Literature DB >> 30129102

Ultrasound-assisted Lumbar Punctures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Michael Gottlieb1, Dallas Holladay1, Gary D Peksa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar punctures (LPs) are a common procedure in emergency medicine. However, studies have found that failed procedure rates can be as high as 50%. Ultrasound has been suggested to improve success rates by visually identifying the location and trajectory for the LP procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine whether the use of ultrasound improved the rate of successful LP performance.
METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, LILACS, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and bibliographies of selected articles were assessed for all randomized controlled trials comparing the success rates of ultrasound-assisted LP with landmark-based LP. Secondary outcomes included the rate of traumatic LPs, time to procedural success, number of needle passes, and patient pain score. Data were dual extracted into a predefined worksheet, and quality analysis was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data were summarized and a meta-analysis was performed with subgroup analyses by pediatric versus adult patients and by operator training level.
RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 957 total patients) were identified. Ultrasound-assisted LP was successful in 90.0% of patients and landmark-based LP was successful in 81.4% of patients. The calculated risk difference (RD) was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2% to 16.7%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.22 (95% CI = 1.03 to 4.77) in favor of the ultrasound-assisted group. There were fewer traumatic LPs in the ultrasound-assisted group (10.7% vs. 26.5%; RD = -16.4%, 95% CI = -27.6% to -5.2%; OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.45). Ultrasound-assisted LP was also associated with a shorter time to successful LP (6.87 minutes vs. 7.97 minutes), fewer mean needle passes (2.07 vs. 2.66), and lower patient pain scores (3.75 vs. 6.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-assisted LPs were associated with higher success rates, fewer traumatic LPs, shorter time to successful LP, fewer needle passes, and lower patient pain scores. Ultrasound should be considered prior to performing all LPs, especially in patients with difficult anatomy. Further studies are recommended to determine whether this effect is consistent in both adult and pediatric subgroups, as well as the impact of transducer type and body habitus on this technique.
© 2018 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30129102     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  12 in total

1.  Real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jason Z Stoller; María Victoria Fraga
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2.  Point of care ultrasonography from the emergency department to the internal medicine ward: current trends and perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Leidi; Frédéric Rouyer; Christophe Marti; Jean-Luc Reny; Olivier Grosgurin
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Lumbar Puncture: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Nilam J Soni; Ricardo Franco-Sadud; Ketino Kobaidze; Daniel Schnobrich; Gerard Salame; Joshua Lenchus; Venkat Kalidindi; Michael J Mader; Elizabeth K Haro; Ria Dancel; Joel Cho; Loretta Grikis; Brian P Lucas
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided intraspinal anesthesia for lower extremity surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ting Zheng; Peng Ye; Weilan Wu; Bin Hu; Lifei Chen; Xiaochun Zheng; Mingxue Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-07

5.  The Variability of Preferred Infant Lumbar Puncture Insertion Site Between Novice and Experienced Physicians.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Neal; Jason A Levy; Rachel G Rempell; Rebecca L Vieira
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-09-12

6.  Morphological parameters of fourth lumbar spinous process palpation: a three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography.

Authors:  Qi Feng; Lei Zhang; Mengyao Zhang; Youliang Wen; Ping Zhang; Yi Wang; Yan Zeng; Junqiu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Feel It, See It, Get It: Is Internal Medicine Residents' Use of Ultrasound in Lumbar Puncture Associated With Higher Success Rate?

Authors:  Mohammed G Elhassan; Mossab Mohameden; May Kam; April Manalaysay; Ratnali V Jain
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 8.  State-of-the-art of lumbar puncture and its place in the journey of patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Harald Hampel; Leslie M Shaw; Paul Aisen; Christopher Chen; Alberto Lleó; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Atsushi Iwata; Masahito Yamada; Takeshi Ikeuchi; Jianping Jia; Huali Wang; Charlotte E Teunissen; Elaine Peskind; Kaj Blennow; Jeffrey Cummings; Andrea Vergallo
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 16.655

9.  Retrospective analysis of predisposing factors for difficult lumbar punctures requiring image guidance in pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Michael J Frett; Heidi Meeks; Kyle J Morgan; Hasmukh Prajapati; Vinod Maller; Robert Gold; Doralina Anghelescu
Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.070

10.  Factors Associated with Lumbar Puncture Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Research.

Authors:  Madeleine M Blazel; Karen K Lazar; Carol A Van Hulle; Yue Ma; Aleshia Cole; Alice Spalitta; Nancy Davenport-Sis; Barbara B Bendlin; Michelle Wahoske; Chuck Illingworth; Carey E Gleason; Dorothy F Edwards; Hanna Blazel; Sanjay Asthana; Sterling C Johnson; Cynthia M Carlsson
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.