Literature DB >> 30128329

Modeling visual search behavior of breast radiologists using a deep convolution neural network.

Suneeta Mall1, Patrick C Brennan1, Claudia Mello-Thoms1.   

Abstract

Visual search, the process of detecting and identifying objects using eye movements (saccades) and foveal vision, has been studied for identification of root causes of errors in the interpretation of mammograms. The aim of this study is to model visual search behavior of radiologists and their interpretation of mammograms using deep machine learning approaches. Our model is based on a deep convolutional neural network, a biologically inspired multilayer perceptron that simulates the visual cortex and is reinforced with transfer learning techniques. Eye-tracking data were obtained from eight radiologists (of varying experience levels in reading mammograms) reviewing 120 two-view digital mammography cases (59 cancers), and it has been used to train the model, which was pretrained with the ImageNet dataset for transfer learning. Areas of the mammogram that received direct (foveally fixated), indirect (peripherally fixated), or no (never fixated) visual attention were extracted from radiologists' visual search maps (obtained by a head mounted eye-tracking device). These areas along with the radiologists' assessment (including confidence in the assessment) of the presence of suspected malignancy were used to model: (1) radiologists' decision, (2) radiologists' confidence in such decisions, and (3) the attentional level (i.e., foveal, peripheral, or none) in an area of the mammogram. Our results indicate high accuracy and low misclassification in modeling such behaviors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior modeling; breast cancer; deep learning; eye tracking; machine learning; mammography; visual search

Year:  2018        PMID: 30128329      PMCID: PMC6086967          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.035502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  14 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography?

Authors:  Claudia Mello-Thoms; Stanley Dunn; Calvin F Nodine; Harold L Kundel; Susan P Weinstein
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Peripheral vision, structured noise and film reader error.

Authors:  H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Searching for lung nodules. The guidance of visual scanning.

Authors:  H L Kundel; C F Nodine; L Toto
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Fixated and Not Fixated Regions of Mammograms: A Higher-Order Statistical Analysis of Visual Search Behavior.

Authors:  Suneeta Mall; Patrick Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Temporal dissociation between the focal and orientation components of spatial attention in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Andrea Albonico; Manuela Malaspina; Emanuela Bricolo; Marialuisa Martelli; Roberta Daini
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-10-12

7.  An analysis of perceptual and cognitive factors in radiographic interpretation.

Authors:  D P Carmody; C F Nodine; H L Kundel
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Measuring agreement between rating interpretations and binary clinical interpretations of images: a simulation study of methods for quantifying the clinical relevance of an observer performance paradigm.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The perception of breast cancers--a spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers.

Authors:  Claudia Mello-Thoms; Stanley M Dunn; Calvin F Nodine; Harold L Kundel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  The false-negative mammogram.

Authors:  P T Huynh; A M Jarolimek; S Daye
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

View more
  3 in total

1.  Eye Tracking for Deep Learning Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  J N Stember; H Celik; E Krupinski; P D Chang; S Mutasa; B J Wood; A Lignelli; G Moonis; L H Schwartz; S Jambawalikar; U Bagci
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Creation and validation of a chest X-ray dataset with eye-tracking and report dictation for AI development.

Authors:  Satyananda Kashyap; Ismini Lourentzou; Joy T Wu; Alexandros Karargyris; Arjun Sharma; Matthew Tong; Shafiq Abedin; David Beymer; Vandana Mukherjee; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Mehdi Moradi
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.444

3.  Tomographic Ultrasound Imaging in the Diagnosis of Breast Tumors under the Guidance of Deep Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Xuehua Xiao; Fengping Gan; Haixia Yu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.